Another guy (also BUAA graduate) claims that the whole thing is fabricated and he knows the original source.
PLA Air Force news, pics and videos
- Thread starter Jeff Head
- Start date
Another guy (also BUAA graduate) claims that the whole thing is fabricated and he knows the original source.
There is no credibility. If it's really the J-20, then why did he hide the aircraft model?
I don't quote understand quoting those two posts and tagging sunnymaxi
====
So the original pictures were not merely selectively blacked out, but fully doctored in general?
In that case, where does that leave the other people saying that the J-16s had also locked onto the F-35s with their IRSTs or something, and that people are aware of an original unmodified document which changes the overall meaning of the picture?
This reeks of a silly slapfight but if there actually is a useful original document behind it then that is where the interest should be
If the J-20 part of the story is faked though maybe these posts need to be moved.
I don't think we can even be sure at this point that the original document actually exists. Not to mention if we can only conclude that it was J-16 that encountered f35 based on the information in the picture.
The originator thinks J-16 has better maneuverability than J-20. Maybe in his perception, no matter how advanced Chinese planes are, Russian planes must be better than Chinese planes. It may come as a surprise, but such Chinese people do exist. And this one reminds me of a Weibo account “深度军用飞机分析” that always argued the J-20 is backward, disregard the reasoning often went wrong. If someone debated him, he would unilaterally declare himself the winner.
"Wouldn't the problem be worse if it was J-16? The flanker has better maneuverability than J-20."
The originator thinks J-16 has better maneuverability than J-20. Maybe in his perception, no matter how advanced Chinese planes are, Russian planes must be better than Chinese planes. It may come as a surprise, but such Chinese people do exist. And this one reminds me of a Weibo account “深度军用飞机分析” that always argued the J-20 is backward, disregard the reasoning often went wrong. If someone debated him, he would unilaterally declare himself the winner.
"Wouldn't the problem be worse if it was J-16? The flanker has better maneuverability than J-20."
There is even a typo "变相". Corrected one should be "变向"(change direction). Hence, it lacks credibility entirely.
Dude now claiming he isn’t responsible for the rumor and wants the guys who exposed him to get arrested for slander. He literally can’t make this stuff up. Almost as ridiculous as Gordon Chang claiming that Chinese illegals were secret SeeSeePee agents.