PLA Air Force news, pics and videos

4Runner

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why? Please elaborate more on this point. Thank you.
It is all about life and welfare after military careers. It is essentially trying to rationalize positions/ranks (官/位)in Chinese mandarine system, including armed forces. One fundamental difference between US armed forces and China armed forces is in their retirement eco-system, which is vital to attract and retain talents in military.

US armed forces have a revolving door in military-industrial complex that China does not have. They also traditionally go to private sectors after retiring from military with whatever benefits they have earned. Or some of them may go for elected political offices. China retired military personal traditionally went to state-owned enterprises or local government offices before reform and opening up circa 1979. Nowadays they would have choices between one-time lump-sum compensation for DIY life or arranged tiered positions in local government offices or government owned commercial entities. One big difference is that nowadays local government usually are less motivated to offer desired positions for mid to high ranking military retirees than pre 1979. China is a more diversified and free society than old days, which is not necessary beneficial for military retirees. The only thing that matters outside one-time compensation is rank, which can carry some weight and welfare in post-military life.

Now come back to positions/ranks (官/位) in modern day Chinese mandarine system. In PLA, "major general" is a very high rank in the whole society, relatively higher than the civilian Bureau Chief (厅/局). In Chinese mandarine system, to most staff, ranks are more important than positions. For example, in a typical county of a province, the county government chief (position) usually carries a rank of Department Chief (处长). But in Shanghai, the same county chief carries the rank of Bureau Chief(局长)。Here is the kicker: the real life difference between 处长 and 局长 is like day and night. Only those who hold tanks higher than Bureau Chief(局长)are called high-ranking officials in the Chinese system, which implications are huge.

Now come back to senior colonel versus brigadier general. As mentioned above, the rank of a Major General is higher than Bureau Chief(局长)in the system. So naturally, Senior Colonel is the closest rank to that of Bureau Chief(局长). However, ranks of Major, Lieutenant Colonel, Colonel and Senior Colonel are never considered high ranking officers in the system. It is somewhat confusing from a whole of society standpoint that a retired Senior Colonel would carry similar weight and welfare as Bureau Chief(局长).

On a final note, though I am not a military expert, I think Brigadier General is better suited to positions such as brigadier commander (旅长) instead of Senior Colonel. In my understanding of PLA, positions of brigadier commander (旅长) are more important than army commander (军长). But they are separated by the deepest division of ranks: Senior Colonel vs Major General, which is not very beneficial in the grand scheme of the Chinese mandarine system.
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
As it seems another hint, the PLAN NA is transferring its or at least some of its assets to the PLAAF: This image allegedly from a NTC JH-7A brigade clearly shows a PLAN NA aircraft.

(Image via @沉默的山羊 from Weibo)

JH-7A no. 74 - NTC Brig allegedly to PLAAF - 沉默的山羊.jpg


So the question is, ... are they just transferring aircraft and as such does the PLAN "empty" its units in order to later re-equip them with carrier aircraft and in PLAAF service they are assigned to already existing units to raise the numbers, or is it even a complete transfer of units and eventually even its bases?
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
The latter makes much more sense.
Aside of a few j11b units, to convert to carrier borne planes in the next 5-10 years, it doesn't make sense for planaf to retain the personnel of so many other combat squadrons.


However the transfer of a whole unit requires the transformation / integration of the whole command and operating mechanisms. And that's why I'm more inclined to think they are just transferring aircraft and not the whole unit and base
 

Jingle Bells

Junior Member
Registered Member
However the transfer of a whole unit requires the transformation / integration of the whole command and operating mechanisms. And that's why I'm more inclined to think they are just transferring aircraft and not the whole unit and base
Yepp, it's the same word we hear a lot from CCTV-7 news: "改装". I don't know how to translate it properly, I would translate it as "Re-equip". So, those PLAN land based units are just going to be re-equipped with (probably) carrier capable flankers in-lieu of their previously held JH-7A/A2. Although, I think they will need twin-seater flankers (J-16, J-15S, J-15BS, or perhaps J-11BS with modifications) to retain their two-seater attacker/anti-surface capabilities.
 
Last edited:

by78

General
Shenyang is building a new test facility with 12,500 square meters of floor space. The facility is code named Plant 902. The construction of the plant was first opened for bid on December 1st, 2022 (1st image below), and by Jan 10th, 2023, a general contractor has been selected and announced (2nd image).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


52675356753_72fa00775e_o.jpg

52674430197_91b8ffdee2_o.jpg
 
Top