PLA AEW&C, SIGINT, EW and MPA thread

[hardware]

it appear the first customer if Pakistan AF zdk-05 AWACS,according to huitong, ZDK-05 was not even fitted with data distribution system.
but trying to put data link terminal inside the FC-1 could be problematic.giving the airframe small size.is there any extra space to spare.

 

[hardware]

据俄罗斯军事工业综合体网站7月29日报道，中国工程院院士王小谟不久前在接受《人民日报》专访时表示，中国的下一代远程预警机将超越所有的国外竞争对手，其中也包括美国的预警机。
　　毫无疑问，中国在研制国产远程预警机方面取得了巨大成就。中方研发此类飞机的首次尝试还是在上世纪60年代末。当时他们曾以老式的苏制图-14轰炸机为平台开发预警机，但结果以失败告终。而在二十一世纪的最初几年中，中国成功地在短时期内推出了三种已投入量产的远程预警机：空警-200、空警-2000和专门针对国际市场的ZDK-03(目前已出口巴基斯坦)。除此之外，中国目前还在研制首款舰载型的JZY-01远程预警机。
　　众所周知，中国现役的所有远程预警机均采用了有源相控阵雷达系统，其中，安装有高功率雷达的空警-2000配备了水冷系统，而吨位较小的空警-200和ZDK-03由于采用了功率相对较低的雷达，故选择了气冷系统。
　　不过，现在就做出中国在预警机技术上已超越其他国家的结论还为时过早。此类技术装备不但复杂异常，还需在交付使用后经常对暴露出的问题进行修正。因此，就一款预警机来说，技术指标上的独一无二尚不能反映其实际的作战能力。
　　让军事专家们感兴趣的是，王小谟院士在接受采访时透露，中国的远程预警机直到2012年在西北地区举行的一次演习中才首次对参演战斗机进行了直接指挥。在此需要强调的是，空警-200预警机在2009年便已服役，而空警-2000的服役时间还要更早。
　　上述事实验证了部分美国专家的推测：他们认为，中国的远程预警机直到不久前还只能向地面指挥中心传送数据，再由后者负责指挥作战飞机。这样以来无疑会降低指挥的效率。这一奇怪的现象也反映出预警机在技术上和组织使用方面的复杂性。毫无疑问，中国人会逐渐克服这些难题，但要实现这一点还尚需时日。
KJ-2000 use liquid cool for her antenna, while KJ--200 and ZDK-200 uses air cool.
according to the US,KJ-2000 has no equivalent to USAF JTIDS,unable to function as a true airborne command and control.information has to be down link to ground control for command and control.
But according to chieft engineer Wang,next generation of AWACS will overcome this problem.or even exceed .

 

[danielchin]

中国的远程预警机直到2012年在西北地区举行的一次演习中才首次对参演战斗机进行了直接指挥。

"Chinese AWACS performed its first direct airborne command to the participant fighters in 2012 in a drill held at the northwest area."

 

[A.Man]

"according to the US,KJ-2000 has no equivalent to USAF JTIDS,unable to function as a true airborne command and control.information has to be down link to ground control for command and control.
But according to chieft engineer Wang,next generation of AWACS will overcome this problem.or even exceed .

That is not what the Chinese text said!

 

[hardware]

That is not what the Chinese text said!

text said,"some american commentator believe data has to be down link to ground control"

 

[hardware]

"Chinese AWACS performed its first direct airborne command to the participant fighters in 2012 in a drill held at the northwest area."

report do not provide us with specific and accurate infomation ,do AWACS uses voice command? using data link?

 

[A.Man]

text said,"some american commentator believe data has to be down link to ground control"

It said more like this way:

The above text confirmed (seemingly) some American experts’ initial assessments: they believe, Chinese long range AWACS, just till a while ago, only performed transmitting data to the ground control centers, the latter responsible for the command of fighters.

 

[usaf0314]

据俄罗斯军事工业综合体网站7月29日报道，中国工程院院士王小谟不久前在接受《人民日报》专访时表示，中国的下一代远程预警机将超越所有的国外竞争对手，其中也包括美国的预警机。
　　毫无疑问，中国在研制国产远程预警机方面取得了巨大成就。中方研发此类飞机的首次尝试还是在上世纪60年代末。当时他们曾以老式的苏制图-14轰炸机为平台开发预警机，但结果以失败告终。而在二十一世纪的最初几年中，中国成功地在短时期内推出了三种已投入量产的远程预警机：空警-200、空警-2000和专门针对国际市场的ZDK-03(目前已出口巴基斯坦)。除此之外，中国目前还在研制首款舰载型的JZY-01远程预警机。
　　众所周知，中国现役的所有远程预警机均采用了有源相控阵雷达系统，其中，安装有高功率雷达的空警-2000配备了水冷系统，而吨位较小的空警-200和ZDK-03由于采用了功率相对较低的雷达，故选择了气冷系统。
　　不过，现在就做出中国在预警机技术上已超越其他国家的结论还为时过早。此类技术装备不但复杂异常，还需在交付使用后经常对暴露出的问题进行修正。因此，就一款预警机来说，技术指标上的独一无二尚不能反映其实际的作战能力。
　　让军事专家们感兴趣的是，王小谟院士在接受采访时透露，中国的远程预警机直到2012年在西北地区举行的一次演习中才首次对参演战斗机进行了直接指挥。在此需要强调的是，空警-200预警机在2009年便已服役，而空警-2000的服役时间还要更早。
　　上述事实验证了部分美国专家的推测：他们认为，中国的远程预警机直到不久前还只能向地面指挥中心传送数据，再由后者负责指挥作战飞机。这样以来无疑会降低指挥的效率。这一奇怪的现象也反映出预警机在技术上和组织使用方面的复杂性。毫无疑问，中国人会逐渐克服这些难题，但要实现这一点还尚需时日。
KJ-2000 use liquid cool for her antenna, while KJ--200 and ZDK-200 uses air cool.
according to the US,KJ-2000 has no equivalent to USAF JTIDS,unable to function as a true airborne command and control.information has to be down link to ground control for command and control.
But according to chieft engineer Wang,next generation of AWACS will overcome this problem.or even exceed .

It says that a staff of the Chinese Engineering Institute state the next generation of long range AWACS by china will surpass all its overseas counterparts, including the United States.

Having the equipment is one thing, but the PLAAF lacks experience in the field... the US has been using AWACS for decades compare to China's mere few years.

 

[Quickie]

text said,"some american commentator believe data has to be down link to ground control"

report do not provide us with specific and accurate infomation ,do AWACS uses voice command? using data link?

That should be referring to the combat operation procedure, definitely not the datalink capability between the jetfighter and Ground Control or AWACS aircraft. What is so difficult doing that? You can use your handphone to download whatever you want.

 

[Hendrik_2000]

It says that a staff of the Chinese Engineering Institute state the next generation of long range AWACS by china will surpass all its overseas counterparts, including the United States.

Having the equipment is one thing, but the PLAAF lacks experience in the field... the US has been using AWACS for decades compare to China's mere few years.

This is another BS that has no connection at all to the reality .Yet this people never stop mouthing this nonsense.

I recall not too long ago the same BS was often mention in this forum in regard when the PLAN will flew the fighter off the Liaoning. Some people here convinced it will take at least 2 years, 5 years some even says 10 years . Well it only take 3 month after commissioning of Liaoning