Indeed. And I don't expect that any senior members of the CCP are masquerading as forum members. So I was pre-empting a comment I have heard ordinary people using as a reason not to do anything about North Korea.
There is an interesting question as to whether the US should have had kept talks with Pyongyang going later than it did. But the current situation seems to be that the US won't agree to one-on-one talks as things stands, because they'll be used for propaganda purposes and because Pyongyang has been duplicitous during previous direct talks.
Rather, the US (I believe) wants multi-party talks or for North Korea to make changes to its nuclear/military policy first. After all, it was North Korea that lied about how it was "not" developing nuclear weapons. And given North Korea's significant threat to its neighbours, I can see why South Korea and Japan, at the very least, would want to be included too.
You can argue that's not sensible, but I don't think that North Korea will give up its nuclear weapons just because 'Lil Kim can sit down with Trump or the Secretary of State. I don't know that North Korea will give up its nuclear weapons as a result of any negotiations (whilst the Kim Dynasty are in charge, anyway), unless maybe there was an iron-clad agreement that it would get something like $100 billion of international aid a year forever.
We should get rid of all nukes and might begin with those of NK but that presupposes an end to threats by US and independence for South Korea thus enabling eventual reunification.
South Korea is independent - that's a fact. As for reunification, the Kim Dynasty will never accept it, because they would lose power. The South would insist on multi-party democracy throughout the newly unified Korea. Even if the Kims were allowed to rig elections in the North, because the North Korean population is about half of that in the South they'd never win an election.
Anyway, I guess this is a non-political thread, so maybe don't talk about Korean politics, just the military issues?
Sorry Delft but how you can say it and do such comparisons seriously ! only naives can trust you !When military much stronger countries like UK and France call their nuclear arms deterrents there is no reason to believe that NK will launches its nukes on a whim.
We should get rid of all nukes and might begin with those of NK but that presupposes an end to threats by US and independence for South Korea thus enabling eventual reunification.
Why do you think NK is investing in nukes and missiles?Sorry Delft but how you can say it and do such comparisons seriously ! only naives can trust you !
I understand that, and I would do the same if I were you to not get my time wasted.Indeed. And I don't expect that any senior members of the CCP are masquerading as forum members. So I was pre-empting a comment I have heard ordinary people using as a reason not to do anything about North Korea.