No More EU Arms Embargo On China in 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chengdu J-10

Junior Member
If the EU arms embargo was lifted from China what kind of airforce would China have in 2020 if the embargo was lifted in 2010??? Includings its own airforce. What would China buy?How many would they buy?Would they actually buy anything?
My thoughts
PLAAF 2020:

J-XX (Operational but in small production)

J-13=Twin Engine J-10 (Operational in production)

J-11A/B Acquire another license to further build another 100 (Finish building the license 200)

J-10A/B Bulk of the PLAAF (J-10 Naval version 2 carrier regiments)

J-8 Couple left ~50 rest retired (Mostly concerned with reconissance and survelliance)

J-7 Completly retired (Latest versions of the J-7 will be converted to UCAV)

JH-7/A/B all versions upgraded to B level (B level carries 9 tonnes, 11 tonnes complete max)

L-15 in production and main trainer aircraft

Q-5 completly retired (Convert to ground attack UCAV)

H-6 completly retired

Y-9 multi purpose transport aircraft for PLAAF

Y-8 beginning to retire earlier versions

Y-5/7 retired

IL-76 recieved all from Russia

IL-78 still in service

C-17 China version in service acting as transport and mid air refueller

Su-27/30 Still in service with upgrades

Foreign:
Rafale & Eurofighter mostly for examination to incorporate into their own systems.
F-22/35 like a chance in hell US will sell them China or vice versa like hell China is keen in paying that much money.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
I doubt that the Europeans would be that stupid to sell Rafale and Typhoon in a sample quantity for the Chinese to study it. And if they did, the Europeans may just sell some downgraded plane.

Actually, China has very little need to study these planes other than their electronic systems, most especially the SPECTRA on the Rafale. But this is a desire for now, in 2007, not 2020. If China is already building some fifth gen fighter at 2020, I'm pretty sure it has no need for the Typhoon or Rafale at all---both would have been obsolete by comparison.

There is no 200 plane limit on the J-11. Its just the number of kits China optioned to buy. China is free to build any number of J-11B as it wants.

JF-17 is probably at this point, some variant with ESA radar and more powerful engines.
 

LiLaZnMaGiCsCt

New Member
Even if the US sold a F-22, China would be able to afford just one, and then they'll be mass producing the F-22 into their own version. Make US even pissed, and start some conflict about weaponry.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
I think it would be better off for China as now with embargo as it "force" China to increase R & D and develop more and more advanced system.

EU arm embargo is nothing but politic ... China has received some advanced sub systems from many EU countries like Germany, France, Italia, etc you name it.

so with or without embargo AND whether you like it or hate it .. China will be progressing in a very fast pace in about every fields

2010-2012 is a critical time for China and Taiwan ... after that .. no chance for Taiwan to fight against China even with USA
 
D

Deleted member 675

Guest
2010-2012 is a critical time for China and Taiwan ... after that .. no chance for Taiwan to fight against China even with USA

I disagree most strongly. After all the US will continue to modernise its forces, and Taiwan will increase its own defensive capabilities. Then there are basic problems China will always have in attacking Taiwan.

I think next decade could be critical, but more because China may become overconfident of its chances of success and use an invasion of Taiwan on a pretext for whipping up nationalism and deflecting domestic criticism. If Taiwan were to make a UDI, it would have done so before 2010/2012 due to the 2008 Olympics.

As to the original post, I doubt very much that the embargo would be lifted by 2010 - it's not even that realistic to dream. Might as well have a thread about what Taiwan's armed forces would look like if Europe/Japan/South Korea sold all they had to offer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Shingy

New Member
I disagree most strongly. After all the US will continue to modernise its forces, and Taiwan will increase its own defensive capabilities. Then there are basic problems China will always have in attacking Taiwan.

I think next decade could be critical, but more because China may become overconfident of its chances of success and use an invasion of Taiwan on a pretext for whipping up nationalism and deflecting domestic criticism. If Taiwan were to make a UDI, it would have done so before 2010/2012 due to the 2008 Olympics.

As to the original post, I doubt very much that the embargo would be lifted by 2010 - it's not even that realistic to dream. Might as well have a thread about what Taiwan's armed forces would look like if Europe/Japan/South Korea sold all they had to offer.

I think he might be talking about the fact China's economic success make the palatable then Taiwan, in the next few years support for Taiwan will go down, is what i was thinking.
Either that or what he meant was, pretty much Taiwan is much closer to China, if China can modernize its navy and land in Taiwan first before any US support gets there, they will have pretty much won, although i think it will just make it harder, war is too ambiguous to know for sure.
I am not too sure on the EU's impression of taking away the arms embargo so i can't comment, i honestly don't think the EU care its just that the US is breathing down our necks.
 
D

Deleted member 675

Guest
I am not too sure on the EU's impression of taking away the arms embargo so i can't comment, i honestly don't think the EU care its just that the US is breathing down our necks.

No, I think the European Union does care. For example, the European Parliament has been consistently against lifting the embargo. They don't make the decisions, but they are directly elected to talk on European affairs (unlike the EU Council).

Also the main proponents of lifting the embargo (Shroeder and Chirac) have now gone, so I'm not sure who is left with real muscle inside the EU to push for it. The leaders of the biggest countries have voiced their opposition (Blair, Merkel and Sarkozy - I doubt Brown will be any different).

China had its best chance in 2005, but I think the Anti-Secession Act scuppered that along with American pressure.
 

fishhead

Banned Idiot
First, Chinese will never depend on large bulk foreign equipments, so large amout of import is impossible, even from Russia.

Second, the EU embargo is not mandatorary and its effect is only symbolic. France, German and Italy never stop selling military equipments to China, only in different civilian names.

The EU embargo is mainly a political thing which just demos that they're still "loyal" to US, not much anything else.
 
D

Deleted member 675

Guest
Second, the EU embargo is not mandatorary and its effect is only symbolic.

The effect is not just symbolic - it has been discussed many times on the forums that there are things China cannot get from Europe because of the embargo.

The EU embargo is mainly a political thing which just demos that they're still "loyal" to US, not much anything else.

Again, absolute rubbish and is an insult to those Europeans that support the embargo because of their own views.
 

fishhead

Banned Idiot
Even without embargo, EU will not sell anything China wants either, as pre-1989 experience shows.

European views? They sell a lot military equipment today. Back in 1990s at the height of military tension of Taiwan strait, British sold all their stock ws-9 engines to China, and they knew only one place the engines would go - FBC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top