Don’t forget one of the biggest scam ever: tulip mania
News on China's scientific and technological development.
- Thread starter Quickie
- Start date
Don’t forget one of the biggest scam ever: tulip mania
that's right my fellow african american brother. Keep training more lawyers
an even more curious mind will notice that the Netherland is famous for prostitution and drugs because no one gives a shit about "corporate law" when thinking about the Netherland. They aren't even unique in that regard! Surely there is a strong connection between the EUV and sex trafficking!
I like the way you think man. My IQ has just dropped to two-digit territory. Makes life more joyful xD
By saying "bridging two sides" you are emphasizing your Chinese ancestry, right? Let me tell you this, the day you took the oath to the stars and strips or your parents did so for you, you were and should treat yourself as a 100% American. At least Chinese should treat you as such. You can NOT stand on two boats when the two boats are fighting one another.
People can bridge two sides regardless their skin color, such as Shafick George Hatem, Agnes Smedley or Henry Norman Bethune, you name it. These people came to China to fight against threat towards China. They are bridges.
You on the other hand are coming here to trick Chinese to surrender. That is not bridging, it is sabotaging. And sabotaging has nothing to do with skin color either, such as Wang Jingwei, not only is he 100% Chinese national, but a high-ranking one.
So please, save everyone's breath, and stop flattering yourself with "Chineseness" that is an insult to all Chinese nationals.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Hey hey hey, I object. Blood always trumps paper (although intent can trump blood...) and I always welcome Chinese people regardless of location or citizenship who consider themselves Chinese and always align with their blood country. Sea turtles don't always have to hold a PRC passport and often it's just easier with greater opportunities for education to convert citizenship. As long as China is in their hearts and they wish to benefit China with that education, they are Chinese brothers and sisters to me. Your line of thinking actually benefits the US in making Chinese people's loyalties so transparent and easily identified by paper. America wants to steal talent and make people innovate against their own blood and ancestry; they should deal with the uncertainty and potential failures of investing people who refuse to play into their agenda by going back home when their education is complete or when they are ready to truly achieve something.
Gadgetfool's problems are way different from those. He's not Chinese; we've already discussed and he's going to tell people he's Japanese when they ask what type of Asian he is.
Last edited:
Didn't Gadgetfool said he is Chinese American before saying he is the bridge? Was he lying or am I blind? Anyway, I don't care to know.
You are right in how you treat people. You are also right that people would have some feeling towards their ancestral country.
But that feeling is idealized and not based on physical and personal interest. After all where do they earn their next meal? where do they have their children? That is where they care most, and will do everything to save even at cost of anybody else when they have to. Let's be honest and face the human nature, spirit is always built on top of material interest.
Although your treating people who consider themselves Chinese (as Chinese) is kind, but their true intention to China is not written on their face. I have seen my friends of decades to gradually switching their attitude towards China after they took their foreign passport. One day we were in the demonstration in supporting China in 2008, the other day (some years later after the switching passport) I heard "why not just let go Tibet and Taiwan?" At that moment, I knew I lost two close friends and two countrymen. P.S. we are still good buddies, I still treat them as friends hanging out for lunch and beer, but not Chinese any more (stopped talking any subject of China with them).
So I think I am treating people just like you are. My point was not about "treating people with kindness regardless of citizenship", my point was about "person act on the ground where they stand according to their interest".
I know my words sound very cold to some people and this may benefit the US. But, that is the truth, isn't it? Despite being very harsh. And I am on the net, the only place where I can say the truth without feeling awkward.
I will stop here now to prevent more damages.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
I mostly agree and said that intent trumps blood. (I edited that into my thing but it was after you had already began composing so you did not see that part.) And that's why it really doesn't matter what passport or citizenship gadgetfool holds; his intent has disqualified him.Didn't Gadgetfool said he is Chinese American before saying he is the bridge? Was he lying or am I blind? Anyway, I don't care to know.
You are right in how you treat people. You are also right that people would have some feeling towards their ancestral country.
But that feeling is idealized and not based on physical and personal interest. After all where do they earn their next meal? where do they have their children? That is where they care most, and will do everything to save even at cost of anybody else when they have to. Let's be honest and face the human nature, spirit is always built on top of material interest.
Although your treating people who consider themselves Chinese (as Chinese) is kind, but their true intention to China is not written on their face. I have seen my friends of decades to gradually switching their attitude towards China after they took their foreign passport. One day we were in the demonstration in supporting China in 2008, the other day (some years later after the switching passport) I heard "why not just let go Tibet and Taiwan?" At that moment, I knew I lost two close friends and two countrymen. P.S. we are still good buddies, I still treat them as friends hanging out for lunch and beer, but not Chinese any more (stopped talking any subject of China with them).
So I think I am treating people just like you are. My point was not about "treating people with kindness regardless of citizenship", my point was about "person act on the ground where they stand according to their interest".
I know my words sound very cold to some people and this may benefit the US. But, that is the truth, isn't it? Despite being very harsh. And I am on the net, the only place where I can say the truth without considering the awkwardness.
I will stop here now to prevent more damages.
All I'm saying is do take the time to find out what someone is about and don't write them off as non-Chinese and unworthy of brotherhood simply because they carry a different passport (which may be temporary).
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Still waiting for your list of accomplishments and rewards that are a result of doing it your way for you to think you know better? If you're right, you should be able to show us all.
solarz
Brigadier
Didn't Gadgetfool said he is Chinese American before saying he is the bridge? Was he lying or am I blind? Anyway, I don't care to know.
You are right in how you treat people. You are also right that people would have some feeling towards their ancestral country.
But that feeling is idealized and not based on physical and personal interest. After all where do they earn their next meal? where do they have their children? That is where they care most, and will do everything to save even at cost of anybody else when they have to. Let's be honest and face the human nature, spirit is always built on top of material interest.
Although your treating people who consider themselves Chinese (as Chinese) is kind, but their true intention to China is not written on their face. I have seen my friends of decades to gradually switching their attitude towards China after they took their foreign passport. One day we were in the demonstration in supporting China in 2008, the other day (some years later after the switching passport) I heard "why not just let go Tibet and Taiwan?" At that moment, I knew I lost two close friends and two countrymen. P.S. we are still good buddies, I still treat them as friends hanging out for lunch and beer, but not Chinese any more (stopped talking any subject of China with them).
So I think I am treating people just like you are. My point was not about "treating people with kindness regardless of citizenship", my point was about "person act on the ground where they stand according to their interest".
I know my words sound very cold to some people and this may benefit the US. But, that is the truth, isn't it? Despite being very harsh. And I am on the net, the only place where I can say the truth without feeling awkward.
I will stop here now to prevent more damages.
I think you're placing too much focus on the existence or lack of a foreign passport.
The passport is just a consequence of having lived in a particular country for a long time. It's how they spent those years that shape their views, not whether they hold a new passport or not.
The United States strategy towards Huawei is stupid beyond stupid.
Suppose Huawei is no longer number #1 in cell phones sales. They could be either 2, 3, or 4 depending on the amount of chips they have.
Samsung would then again be number #1 in cell phones sales, a Korean company. Then the Chinese companies, if we take them together, probably account for 50% at least of cell phone sales in this world, and maybe 60% to 70% of cell phone manufacturing in this world.
Yet, the United States government will insist on this glorious victory for them (for mostly propaganda reasons).
Now the United States government is determined to degrade American semiconductor companies and undermine their future potential with hinting at restrictions to the China market.
We should note here, that there are no current restrictions, yet everyone just assumes there will be.
Kind of like a married couple who are not officially divorced but they already there.
What did the United States gain out of this?
Huawei still number #1 in 5G network equipment leading the next industrial revolution.
American semiconductor companies have their real interest in terms of profits slashed which will lower R&D which affect negatively their competitiveness. Everyone knows this. Except the Trump administration.
We do not even have to comment on the American 5G manufacturing industry because they do not even got one. Maybe a few companies in China will pick up this mantle of O-Ran and produce some low cost parts.
Bwahahahahahaha!
Since the United States is not prepared to commit the necessary infrastructure to unroll 5G, due primarily to having a state that is not properly purposive, the United States wants to prevent any other state that is not amenable to its influenced or directives from doing so and thereby dominating it. The Americans are techno fascists. They are obsessed with ensuring their technological preeminence and controlling, directing, restricting, obstructing, and preventing others from making tech improvements that they they fear being significantly exceeded in. Americans believe in and want to maintain a hierarchy among nation states with themselves unassailably at the top, and China greatly threatens that and as such is targeted as a enemy.