Your statements are empty, pointless, flat out wrong, and based on nothing other than your imagination.
Based on your reasoning So if i cannot prove the earth is not round then earth is not around?
Your logic is really pathetic. Someone with this level of thinking cannot present any valuable arguments nor can he have respectable knowledge in any scientific field... We know the earth is round because we have evidence. If there was no evidence, of course, nobody can claim it to be any shape.
Even if i cannot prove something explicitly doesnt mean your viewpoint is correct
My viewpoint is that you should prove your claim. In terms of history, it is not necessarily contradictory to yours, just that when you tell a story, it must have evidence if it is not fiction.
I said China IC industry was self sufficient at that time and no one was selling China anything at the time. China created first IC not transistor in 1965. And not many countries accomplished that. That was a fact. Do you have anything to contradict that?
That's not how logic works; you don't just make claims for other people to disprove. You need to back up your claims with evidence; the burden of proof is on you. Just because your basic facts are right does not mean that your conclusions from them are correct. You made some huge statements that China was leading in this tech in the 50's and that it was self-sufficient ( at a leading level as well). So you need to prove both, and you have failed. I don't need to contradict anything.
Does it matter? US can access EUV equipment anyway it wants. No one can deny US. Thats just a fact
What got US fell behind intel got arrogant and didnt spend enough time on EUV research.
Of course it matters. Ownership means that the US was talented enough to develop everything but control simply means political power. When your article said that China was close to the US in semiconductor technology, it meant close to what the US had developed, which is terribly insufficient, NOT what the US controls through fear. Big difference. And what the US controls through fear, it can lose control of when they fear someone else more.
Why are you focused on history instead of now? As things pertain to the current situation, regarding the potential/ability of focused lasers to be used in mass production and on whether companies can hire employees to monitor their systems daily, you were wrong twice. That's most pertinent to today's technological landscape.