Exactly, Britain was never going to use Huawei.People using Trump as excuse.
Exactly, Britain was never going to use Huawei.People using Trump as excuse.
Who gives a fuck, the UK economy is screwed as hell due to its Brexit and they only have the US as a crutch now which is about has good as a no deal since the US economy is also in the shits as well due to Trump trying to open the economy up in the middle of the pandemic and when it is still in full swing. Both nations have lost the ability to innovate/lead because they have anti progressive idiots leading them, I mean there countries are literally top of the ranks in terms of infections and deaths from this pandemic while the HAD A BLOODY 2 MONTH PERIOD TO PREPARE from when China told the world officially. I mean they spend lots of time shitting on China but even at the worst of it, China did get shit together and even now is still helping other nations around the world, something the US and UK cannot do at all or rather does not have the heart to do. Not using Huawei makes a lick of difference since those nations will suffer, not China. Heck even taking in 3 million people from HK will do more harm to the UK and US then China and they are too proud and stupid to notice since they seem to think there empire is still at its peak rather falling all the way down like it is right now. All that it requires is a full on civil war (due to unemployment and racism) and then they are done. Now all Trump needs to do to kick that off is simply ending the stimulus package.....Exactly, Britain was never going to use Huawei.
Unmanned may not be the greatest "achievement", but it should pay off handsomely. Road construction 24x7 with minimal or no crew... I think this is pretty cool and useful. If it's low hanging fruit, so much the better.The pacemaker situation is eye opening. Ty.
Unmanned anything isn't that commendable an "achievement". I don't see it as a technological development either. What's the innovation involved here? Unmanned ships, Trains, road rollers, lawn Mowers etc aren't exactly big innovations. I see these as mere PR or Marketing. Borderline gimmicky even.
Let's be real, most of us know this. XCMG gets points for better PR.
What we need are champions who do heavy lifting. Champions who tinker with Basic Physics, Chemistry, Metallurgy etc. Big companies who really explore the cutting edge. Big companies who leave others far behind.
Huawei just got dumped by TSMC. I personally observe cautious optimism over this news. This means that there is an incentive. It means that the path is clear - either strive for greatness or go down with 2015-2020 as the golden Era for Huawei.
It's upto the Chinese to decide if they're going to be told what to do or if they want to forge their own path.
Well what do you expect, by pandering to the USA, China has no choice but to cut loose from the UK, meaning that the UK has to fend for themselves. What this means is that in the likely situation that China would have been there cushion from there stupid actions in regards to Brexit, now they will fall straight down and no one will save them (considering there history as an empire that never appologies for there actions, it would be in everyone's best interest in letting the UK destroy itself if they cannot stop there flip flopping tendencies, the USA is not their friend). Heck the US pretty much got them into this largely avoidable situation. I swear Pompeo is going to destroy the economies of all of the USA's allies because of his hate for China and lack of foresight in regards to actions having consequences. I wonder, when the US decouples from China and has to make and build all of there crap themselves, I am wondering, who is going to go to the trouble to bring manufacturing back when there is almost no profit for doing so.
Apparently TSMC can do 3nm with current EUV lithographic machines, so SMIC probably won't need to wait for the CIOMP/SMEE high NA EUV tool to come out before moving on its own 3nm.By 2025, SMIC will probably be on pilot/LRIP of 3nm (assuming that CIOMP/SMEE has delivered a high numeric aperture EUV tool prototype in that timeframe), and TSMC established on 2nm.
So CIOMP/SMEE's upcoming EUV machine (the one corresponding to the 2017 tech demonstrator) should be able to reach 3nm?Apparently TSMC can do 3nm with current EUV lithographic machines, so SMIC probably won't need to wait for the CIOMP/SMEE high NA EUV tool to come out before moving on its own 3nm.
Apparently photomasks is key to 3nm at 0.33 NA EUV.