News on China's scientific and technological development.

broadsword

Brigadier
From what I found, Apple's Ultra Wideband latency is listed as less than 5ms, which is still slower.

I should not have used Qualcomm's aptX for comparison as it is only a codec.
 

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member

GII Science and Technology Clusters: Tokyo-Yokohama Tops Ranking; China Now Home to Greatest Number​


As per WIPO’s Global Innovation Index (GII) 2023 Edition -

top 15 Technological and innovation clusters globally

1. Tokyo–Yokohama
2. Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou
3. Seoul
4. Beijing
5. Shanghai–Suzhou
6. San Jose–San Francisco, CA
7. Osaka–Kobe–Kyoto
8. Boston–Cambridge, MA
9. San Diego, CA
10. New York City, NY
11. Nanjing
12. Paris
13. Wuhan
14. Hangzhou
15. Nagoya

China has most number of tech/innovation clusters in top 5 and top 15. while USA has more in top 10.

countries with total number of tech/innovation clusters in top 100

1. China - 24
2. USA - 21
3. Germany - 9
4. Canada/Korea/Japan/India - 4 each
5. France/UK/Australia - 3
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Screen Shot 2023-09-21 at 3.16.12 PM.png

Today, Xiaomi presented its new Redmi phone, but it didn't stop there. It also showcased new projector & ice maker. It's also making compressors for Panasonic.

The Chinese tech companies are making everything into consumer electronics. While doing this, they have also made everything "smart" and require more chips.

As this happens who end up designing the chips and fabbing them are more important than ever, since they will control the supply chain. And these consumer electronics don't require 5 to 7nm chips, 28nm SoCs + 32-bit MCUs & RF modules are sufficient
 

Maikeru

Major
Registered Member

GII Science and Technology Clusters: Tokyo-Yokohama Tops Ranking; China Now Home to Greatest Number​


As per WIPO’s Global Innovation Index (GII) 2023 Edition -

top 15 Technological and innovation clusters globally

1. Tokyo–Yokohama
2. Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou
3. Seoul
4. Beijing
5. Shanghai–Suzhou
6. San Jose–San Francisco, CA
7. Osaka–Kobe–Kyoto
8. Boston–Cambridge, MA
9. San Diego, CA
10. New York City, NY
11. Nanjing
12. Paris
13. Wuhan
14. Hangzhou
15. Nagoya

China has most number of tech/innovation clusters in top 5 and top 15. while USA has more in top 10.

countries with total number of tech/innovation clusters in top 100

1. China - 24
2. USA - 21
3. Germany - 9
4. Canada/Korea/Japan/India - 4 each
5. France/UK/Australia - 3
How do you know this? It's not released until 27th:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Edit: I found this -
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

sunnymaxi

Major
Registered Member

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A 300,000-year-old jawbone discovered in a cave in eastern China could represent a new branch of the human family tree.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
: it’s thick along the jawline, a feature shared with early human species, and lacks the true chin of Homo sapiens. But the side of the mandible is more reminiscent of that of modern humans. The finding deepens the mystery of which ancient human species inhabited East Asia during the Pleistocene, and whether any of them could be ancestors of modern humans.




Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

They were able to successfully create the first “localized” full-length spider silk fiber using transgenic silkworms. This fiber has an extraordinary toughness (319 MJ/m3) and high tensile strength (1,299 MPa), surpassing the toughness of most natural and synthetic fibers and more than four times that of nylon.

This discovery offers important new information for the creation of supermaterials, such as those needed for space elevators.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
” was published on September 20, 2023, in the Cell Press journal Matter.
 

dingyibvs

Senior Member
True, and Chinese companies could take their advantage by offering both versions. If the best Bluetooth is the current one, they could earn bigger profits as most will opt for Nearlink. It takes 10ms to feel a sharp pain and 13ms to see an image, so 1/30ms is how mindboggling Nearlink is.
1/30th the latency of BT, so should be about 1-2ms, not 1/30ms.
 
Top