News on China's scientific and technological development.

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member
If the stretch of 1000 km speed was say 125km out of that 150 km, it would just be a small ~7.5 minutes of time.

The whole journey from start to finish might then be at ~10 minutes, although that's only for train start and stop not boarding, check in etc.
If we had that sort of infrastructure here in the Netherlands I would be working in Amsterdam instead of lower tier city:p

Hell even 20+ min for 150 km would be fine.
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
Instead of focusing to attract these overseas students back, perhaps they should focus on mitigating why so many young talented Chinese are leaving in the first place.
Are Chinese universities that bad which caused such influx of Chinese students to Western mostly American universities?
The number of Chinese going outside to study is actually low compared to those staying in China (700k overseas vs 19m domestic bachelors and 16m other degrees).

Currently, of those studying overseas, a big 85%+ returns.

And lastly, why do you think it's the most talented and smart that goes out (hint, it's more the rich and dumb that takes overseas degrees).
 

Andy1974

Senior Member
Registered Member
If the stretch of 1000 km speed was say 125km out of that 150 km, it would just be a small ~7.5 minutes of time.

The whole journey from start to finish might then be at ~10 minutes, although that's only for train start and stop not boarding, check in etc.
It takes the same amount of time to travel just a few subway stops as it will to travel between the 2 cities, it effectively connects two individual cities to make one decentralized city.
 

CMP

Senior Member
Registered Member
Instead of focusing to attract these overseas students back, perhaps they should focus on mitigating why so many young talented Chinese are leaving in the first place.
Are Chinese universities that bad which caused such influx of Chinese students to Western mostly American universities?
Bachelors overseas = rich and dumb relative to direct peers. Too dumb to compete in gaokao.

Masters overseas = rich and dumb relative to direct peers. Too dumb to get a good (STEM) PhD spot either domestically or overseas.

Masters domestically = dumb relative to direct peers. Too dumb to get a good (STEM) PhD spot either domestically or overseas.

Good (STEM) PhD domestically or overseas = poor and smart

Liberal arts students at any level, domestically or overseas? Hopeless trash not even worth thinking about.
 
Last edited:

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
It takes the same amount of time to travel just a few subway stops as it will to travel between the 2 cities, it effectively connects two individual cities to make one decentralized city.
Ticket price is of paramount importance. It needs to be low enough for the middle class to regularly use for work or leisure
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Instead of focusing to attract these overseas students back, perhaps they should focus on mitigating why so many young talented Chinese are leaving in the first place.
Are Chinese universities that bad which caused such influx of Chinese students to Western mostly American universities?
You have been on this forum for eons and yet your take on China is still pretty outdated, and down right stupid. Do you even actually do some reading and research on the topic(s) you love to bring up here from time to time as your strawman argument and half-baked dumb assumptions?

The level of competition amongst the Chinese students is FIERCE especially when trying to get into the top universities in the country. The rest of them that couldn't make it (my friends, my ex) go to Australia, Canada, New Zealand, U.K. and the U.S. as the case with the people I mentioned. Now, was the level of rigor and quality of Chinese universities on par with western universities decades ago? Of course not, but that's hardly the case today. Check the university ranking from whatever source you'd like to use.

I have yet to read something less snarky and judgmental from you man. Have some respect to the country and people that's clearly making you lot uneasy and restless and here you are having this dumb question with "Chinese universities suck" lol.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member

DJI’s new Mavic 3 Pro rocks three cameras instead of two​


1682454440065.png

About a year and a half after the launch of DJI’s flagship Mavic 3 drone, the company is now releasing a newly refreshed “Pro” version that’s rocking, well, three cameras instead of two.
The new DJI Mavic 3 Pro — and its slightly more movie-magic-focused Mavic 3 Pro Cine counterpart — arrive next month and come with a new triple-camera system that includes the four-thirds Hasselblad camera included in the previous model. That main shooter uses a 24mm lens (like the standard Mavic 3), but it’s now joined by a new 70mm medium-tele camera and a 166mm zoom camera for more precise framing.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Bachelors overseas = rich and dumb relative to direct peers. Too dumb to compete in gaokao.

Masters overseas = rich and dumb relative to direct peers. Too dumb to get a good (STEM) PhD spot either domestically or overseas.

Masters domestically = dumb relative to direct peers. Too dumb to get a good (STEM) PhD spot either domestically or overseas.

Good (STEM) PhD domestically or overseas = poor and smart

Liberal arts students at any level, domestically or overseas? Hopeless trash not even worth thinking about.
China requires MS before a PhD just like Australia and European countries...
 
Top