News on China's scientific and technological development.

Rising China

Junior Member
:china::china::china:

China set to supersede US in research output

Fastest growing global economy China will overtake the US within the next decade in terms of research output, reveals a Thomson Reuters study. According to the research report, there is an “explosive growth” in research output from China, far outpacing research activity in the rest of the world

By IWR News Desk, Information World Review 03 Nov 2009
Currently China ranks second to the US after surpassing the UK, Germany and Japan in 2006.


Called Global Research Report: China, the study found that China’s output increased from around 20,000 research papers in 1998 to nearly 112,000 in 2008. The nation doubled its output since 2004 alone.

It also found that the nation’s research is concentrated in the physical sciences and technology. Materials science, chemistry and physics predominate. According to the study, rapid growth can be seen in agricultural sciences and life sciences fields such as immunology, microbiology, and molecular biology and genetics.

“If China’s research growth remains this rapid and substantial, European and North American institutions will want to be part of it,” said Jonathan Adams, director of research evaluation at Thomson Reuters. “China no longer depends on links to traditional G8 partners to help its knowledge development. When Europe and the US visit China they can only do so as equal partners.”

The study is based on data found in Web of Science, available on the Web of Knowledge citation platform. It suggests that the US stands out in terms of collaboration with China, US-based authors contributed to nearly 9% of papers from China-based institutions between 2004 and 2008.

The latest report forms part of the Global Research Report series from Thomson Reuters that illustrates the changing landscape and dynamics of global research around the world. It aims at informing policymakers about the research and collaboration potential of China and its current place in world science.
 

tres

New Member
From Shenzhen Post (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)

Huawei Being Close to Ericsson but Far Away from Cisco
Published on November 27, 2009 by Rebecca | This story has been viewed 401 times

On the road of climbing to the peak of world-class enterprises, Huawei beats an important rival again. According to the data recently released by the market research firm Dell’Oro, Huawei has surpassed Nokia and Siemens to become the second-largest telecom equipment supplier in the global telecom equipment market. As of this third quarter, Huawei’s share has risen to 20% from last year’s corresponding figure of 11%, and leaped into second place; while Ericsson continues to take first place with a share of 32%.

At present, Huawei’s direct aim is to compete with Ericsson. Among telecom equipment manufacturers, Ericsson has not only maintained its boss position in revenue and market share for many years, but also has strongest capacity of profitability. However judging from development momentum of Huawei, it is promising for Huawei to prevail over Ericsson in term of scare. In recent years, since Huawei’s growth has always been higher than Ericsson, its sales revenue continually approximates to Ericsson’s: in 2004, Huawei’s sales revenue was $3.827 billion, while Ericsson 132 billion Kronor (about $17.16 billion at the exchange rate by the end of 2008); in 2008, Huawei $18.33 billion, and Ericsson 208.9 billion Kronor (about $27.16 billion). If both sides keep growth at the current rate, Huawei will be able to transcend Ericsson in term of revenue in 2 years.

Of course, Ericsson will not wait for Huawei’s chasing, and their “seesaw battle” will get more acute. Ericsson has recently completed a $1.13 billion purchase transaction of CDMA and LTE assets of the Canadian insolvent company Nortel Networks, and further strengthened its leading market position. Huawei has taken the new-generation LTE mobile networks as a strategic key. What’s more, Huawei recently beat Ericsson and won the contract of construction MAGNET in Norway, which will replace the old network constructed by Nokia and Siemens. This deal is the largest LTE transaction in European market so far.

Although the distance is getting closer, it is still not easy to exceed. In the business layout, Huawei has a broader business line, which is conducive to seize more market opportunities and wide business scale. But there is some gap between Huawei and Ericsson — Huawei inadequately focuses on business, whose specialized business is less prominent. In addition, compared to the century-old Ericsson with a 133-year history, Huawei still lags far behind Ericsson in comprehensive strength such as management, brand and cultural foundation. Huawei mainly depended on products cost-effective and rapid execution before, but now it increasingly matches directly with the “peak” enterprises like Ericsson. Thus, the function of “soft power” such as management, brand and cultural foundation will be more projected.

However, the officers of Huawei believe that Ericsson “is there”, and it is not a difficult aim for Huawei to surpass Ericsson. The management innovations of finance transformation in Huawei are goning on for emulating the world-class companies such as Ericsson in “soft power”.

At one time, Cisco was “very close” to Huawei who became a threat to Cisco, which is the background in January 2003 when the case of Cisco suing Huawei for infringing intellectual property occurred. At that time, Huawei was once called the “the nightmare of Chambers”; but Cisco got away from the Huawei “nightmare” long ago, and successfully switched to high-margin domain. Cisco’s competitors are now no longer Huawei, but Microsoft, Google, Hewlett-Packard, even IBM and other new rivals. Since fewer and fewer elements in common between Huawei and Cisco’s business, their competition is no longer in the same level.

Under the general trend of ICT fusion, Cisco, Alcatel and other telecom equipment giants have turned to industry-enterprise networking market. At the same time, HP, Microsoft and other IT companies are penetrating through telecom industry, based on which HP acquired 3COM.

Two years ago, Huawei tried to join Bain Capital to acquire 3Com at the price of $2.2 billion but failed because of the US government’s concerning about national security. It may be able to narrow the distance with Cisco if Huawei successfully purchased 3COM, but unfortunately HP took 3COM at last. Huawei’s business is now still focused on telecom network, while enterprise network business is very small and limited. On the way of ICT integration progress, the gap between Huawei and Cisco is growing, and there is a long way to chase after Cisco for Huawei.

Shenzhen Post Rebecca Contributes to the Story.

WSJ piece on how Huawei won the contracts:
(
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)

China's Huawei Challenges European Rivals on Quality

By GUSTAV SANDSTROM

STOCKHOLM—Huawei Technologies Co.'s challenge to European rivals has largely focused on its pricing advantage. But industry watchers say the Chinese network-equipment vendor, which last week won a contract from Belgian telecommunications provider Belgacom SA, now has another key selling point: the quality of its technology.

Analysts say Huawei Technologies is increasingly competing on quality, not just prices, especially in Europe. Above, a Huawei convention booth.

As the telecom industry emerges from the global economic slump, European telecommunication-gear companies—global market leader Telefon AB L.M. Ericsson; Nokia Siemens Networks, a joint venture between Finland's Nokia Corp. and Germany's Siemens AG; and Paris-based Alcatel-Lucent SA—are likely to face increased pressure from world No. 2 Huawei in their own backyard.

Huawei, which like smaller peer ZTE Corp. is based in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen, was founded 1988, and revenue and earnings have risen steadily.

Its sales increased to $18.33 billion last year, the latest figure available, from $5.98 billion in 2005, while profit rose to $1.15 billion from $681 million.

While European vendors have, to some extent, been able to keep these low-cost Chinese rivals at bay through superior equipment, Huawei is growing quickly both because it offers lower prices than most rivals and because the quality of its equipment is getting better, said analyst Scott Siegler at research firm Dell'Oro, based in Redwood, Calif. "When we talk to service providers that use Huawei's equipment, we have been told that it is excellent technology, he said."

Huawei's share of the global infrastructure market almost doubled in revenue terms to 20.1% from 10.9% in the third quarter from a year earlier, leaving behind Nokia Siemens and Alcatel-Lucent, according to Dell'Oro.

In the same period, Ericsson's market share remained largely flat at 31.6%. Nokia Siemens's share of the market fell to 19.4% from 23.7%, and Alcatel-Lucent's, to 13.1% from 14.3%. ZTE remained the fifth-largest vendor, but its market share rose to 6.8% from 4.2%.

It is in Europe where the battle is really heating up. Norway's largest telecom operator, Telenor ASA, this month selected Huawei to supply its new Norwegian wireless network, replacing gear supplied by Ericsson and Nokia Siemens.

The six-year contract, which includes services and maintenance, was handed to Huawei on the basis of several criteria, including price and technical specifications, Telenor Norway Chief Executive Ragnar Karhus said.

The quality of Huawei's equipment has improved and the company is now "completely in line" with the European vendors in terms of technology and services, Mr. Karhus said.

Last week, Huawei won another European deal, to upgrade Belgacom's radio-access networks under a long-term agreement. Belgacom is Belgium's largest telecommunications operator.

Telecom operators typically sign contracts with equipment vendors running for several quarters or even years, and this could slow the entry of new vendors to some extent.

Still, operators across Europe are expected from next year onward to gradually introduce equipment based around a fourth-generation standard known as Long Term Evolution. This should give the Chinese vendors another opportunity.

"We expect the transition to 4G will allow Huawei to gain momentum in Europe," Goldman Sachs said in a recent note to investors. "Clearly there are rising competitive risks in Western Europe."

That risk was spelled out clearly by Nokia Chief Financial Officer Rick Simonson, who said recently there is increasing price competition "primarily from the Chinese competitors ZTE and Huawei."

Telenor's Mr. Karhus said Huawei supplies particularly effective multibase stations, which support several transmission frequencies and technical standards in the same box, increasing operators' flexibility.

Nokia Siemens in October posted a 21% drop in third-quarter revenue from a year earlier and said it will lose more market share this year than expected, even as it gave a more positive outlook for the overall market.

As Nokia Siemens is consolidated in Nokia's balance sheet, it has a significant impact on the handset maker's financial performance. Nokia reported a worse-than-expected third-quarter loss after it booked a €908 million ($1.36 billion) goodwill impairment on the joint venture because of "challenging competitive factors and market conditions" in the network-infrastructure business.

Huawei has so far had much less success in overseas regions outside Europe, including in the big U.S. and Japanese markets. Last year, the Americas contributed only 12% of the company's contract sales, compared with 47% from Asia Pacific and 41% from Europe, Middle East and Africa, according to Huawei spokesman Ross Gan.

Due in part to political sensitivity, it has been difficult for Huawei to gain a foothold in North America and Japan, the world's third-largest telecom-equipment market, after the U.S. and China, said analyst Tina Tian at research firm Gartner Inc.

The U.S. government last year blocked Huawei from buying U.S.-based networking-equipment company 3Com Corp. because it had government contracts to provide security software.

Still, Huawei's Mr. Gan said the company expects business momentum to continue in North America and Japan, adding that its main competitive strength is still to provide services at a lower total cost of ownership.

In the U.S., it provides telecom equipment and services to Cox Communications Corp. and Clearwire Corp.

Robert Fox, chief branding officer of Huawei's branding division, said in a recent interview that next year it hopes to add 600 employees to its 900 existing staff in North America. Globally, it has more than 87,500 workers.

Despite its rapid growth, it will still take some time before Huawei approaches the position of market leader Ericsson, which has expanded its presence in North America through the acquisition of Nortel Networks Corp. assets and has won a number of large service contracts with operators including U.S.-based Sprint Nextel Corp.

Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent earlier this year also won a major contract to supply Verizon Wireless with its fourth-generation wireless network. Vodafone Group PLC has a minority stake in Verizon Wireless, which is majority owned by Verizon Communications Inc.

Write to Gustav Sandstrom at [email protected]
 

rhino123

Pencil Pusher
VIP Professional
Algae the better renewable fuel?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Actually, yes. It is the best alternate fuel that we can come up with. The only problem is that it is not easy to cultivate them as they require massive amount of water area to grow and not alot of them are available anywhere else in the world, unless you are living in some island state or somewhere near the sea.

But I believe there is once a algae infestition in China Qingdao, and tons of these greenish thing are cleared away, I wonder why the chinese don't keep them for use as a fuel.
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
Actually, yes. It is the best alternate fuel that we can come up with. The only problem is that it is not easy to cultivate them as they require massive amount of water area to grow and not alot of them are available anywhere else in the world, unless you are living in some island state or somewhere near the sea.

But I believe there is once a algae infestition in China Qingdao, and tons of these greenish thing are cleared away, I wonder why the chinese don't keep them for use as a fuel.

I vaguely remember some American companies playing around with sometime ago with that stuff. They seem to think it has possibilities then, plus it has a advantage of a eastern and western seabord , thus making up for a larger coastline
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
Actually, yes. It is the best alternate fuel that we can come up with. The only problem is that it is not easy to cultivate them as they require massive amount of water area to grow and not alot of them are available anywhere else in the world, unless you are living in some island state or somewhere near the sea.

But I believe there is once a algae infestition in China Qingdao, and tons of these greenish thing are cleared away, I wonder why the chinese don't keep them for use as a fuel.

I vaguely remember some American companies playing around with sometime ago with that stuff. They seem to think it has possibilities then, plus it has a advantage of a eastern and western seabord , thus making up for a larger coastline
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
Cisco does only routers, I don't recall them doing wireless telecommunication like Ericsson.

In any case, today's posting topic is about sheer speed.

Huawei First to Showcase Live LTE Services with Telefónica O2 UK with Downlink Speed of 150Mb/s

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


To put that simply, 3G phones are doing downlinks of 3.6Mb/s and 7.2Mb/s. That's the speed of about DSL and ADSL landlines. This is like nearly 50x faster.

This must be scary for Ericsson, still the no. 1 telecom provider but for how long.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Chinese Huawei wins Swedish 4G network deal from Ericsson

Right completely in Ericsson's own backyard.

Also speed related but not on telecom is this.

Chinese high-speed train sets new record

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


This is like an average speed of 350kph for the Maglev and with a peak speed close to 400kph.
 
"Ticket prices have been set at Rmb780 ($115, €80, £72) for first class and Rmb490 for second. The country’s airlines, which like the railway are mostly state-owned, have responded by slashing fares to undercut those for the new train, with China Southern Airlines, based in Guangzhou, offering tickets for advance purchase starting at Rmb250 and introducing hourly flights."

Already the trains are forcing the airlines to cut fares. This can only be good for the traveling public. $70 (Guangzhou to Wuhan.) fare is still a fraction (<half) of Shinkansen Trip from Tokyo to Osaka for an equivalent 3 hour trip.
 

Violet Oboe

Junior Member
PRC's emerging network of high speed railways is a nice example of Chinese effective pragmatism. Beijing decided in 2001 to buy licensed technology from Germany, Japan, France, Italy and Canada instead of developing everything from scratch in China (indigenous projects were consequently canceled).

All critics harping on the fact that CRH2 and CRH3 are just ´copies´ of ICE/Velaro (Germany) and Shinkansen E2 (Japan) miss the point since China has actually made a bargain deal: Acquiring the best available technology and having the largest (13000 km!) and most modern high speed network established in the shortest possible timeframe (2012-13).

In contrast Britain will begin planning in 2010, building in 2017 and the trains will run hopefully on only one track between London and Birmingham in 2025..., the fastest ´snail train´ ever built, I presume!:D
 
Last edited:
Top