This is an extremely important move. We always have to evaluate, when someone says something is "good", that there are many questions unanswered by these assertions:I like the "NOT to submit to Top500". It is a move to discredit or downgrade the list. Instead, people in the world are forced to listen to two voices and make the choice of who to rely on. Build my own rival stage of show. In a way, up to today, people is like "this is that because somebody says so", in the future more question would follow "are you sure? because I heard something else."
Good? By what metric?
Why was that metric chosen?
Who participated in the comparison?
Who judged?
What is the end result of the comparison?