New Type98/99 MBT thread

by78

General
Armored recovery vehicle.

51546728892_148b66e370_h.jpg

51548254434_48bfa384c1_h.jpg

51546728917_c2df61e664_h.jpg
 

DeXM

New Member
Registered Member
by the way, I'd like to ask if there's any documental evidence of using CH1000 transmission in 99A? I mean, it's obvious, there're a lot of articles stating CH-1000 transmission on 99A, even wiki, howewer, without documental proofs. Therefore, I wanted to be clarified, but is there any documents where the installation of such a transmission would be mentioned so that then not to prove other basic provisions?
 

FishWings

Junior Member
Registered Member
by the way, I'd like to ask if there's any documental evidence of using CH1000 transmission in 99A? I mean, it's obvious, there're a lot of articles stating CH-1000 transmission on 99A, even wiki, howewer, without documental proofs. Therefore, I wanted to be clarified, but is there any documents where the installation of such a transmission would be mentioned so that then not to prove other basic provisions?
There was some discussion about this on the SH website, check this page:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
Today I heard from a Turkish analyst that the Chinese tank engines were extremely unreliable. He claimed their average lifespan was less than 1000 hours. The said analyst is a knowledgeable and respected person so I don't think he is lying. But I think he is misinformed as I couldn't find evidence supporting this. Do any of you have knowledge?
 

el pueblo unido

Junior Member
Registered Member
Today I heard from a Turkish analyst that the Chinese tank engines were extremely unreliable. He claimed their average lifespan was less than 1000 hours. The said analyst is a knowledgeable and respected person so I don't think he is lying. But I think he is misinformed as I couldn't find evidence supporting this. Do any of you have knowledge?
being Chinese is the original sin of all, and there are no China expert outside of china, also maybe at least include the reference, who is the analyst and what evidence is his claim based on ?
 

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
being Chinese is the original sin of all, and there are no China expert outside of china, also maybe at least include the reference, who is the analyst and what evidence is his claim based on ?
His name is Kozan S. Erkan. He is a naval architect himself. He is not an anti-China person BTW. In fact, most of his content on China is very positive. I asked him his resources.
His profile:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top