TerraN_EmpirE
Tyrant King
in there defense, that is why the shells are stored with the projectiles facing aft so that the natural reaction to a cook off would be away from the hull.Problem with blow out panels is that they are, by design, structural weak points.
Having them on top of the turret is just about still acceptable because with the exception of top attack munitions, a tank isn't expecting to get hit there (and in the case of top attack, a tank is pretty much dead without active defense, so it doesn't make muck difference).
not so much in it as under it in the hull still, your right on. This is one of the reasons why the Abrams TTB which had a unmanned turret an Carousel loader was rejected, as driving over a mine would likely cook off the ammo.Blow out panels work by providing a structural weak point in the direction you want blast energy to be channeled, that mean the rest of the compartment where you store the munitions need to be stronger than the panels. With a bustle ammunition locker, you just need to reinforce the bulkhead leading towards the crew compartment.
With a carousel, the munitions are stored in the main fighting compartment.
again accurate. in the event of a cook off the crew in a armored compartment in the hull fire walled from the Carousel would allow the turret to be blown away well still allowing the potential for a unharmed crew.You just cannot feasible install strong enough bulkheads in there without fundamentally changing the structure of the entire tank, even if you had enough physical space.
Try as I may, I cannot see how that could be done and still leave enough space for the crew and for the turret to still function.
The Armata's separate armoured crew capsule is the only way to totally protect the crew with a carousel loader, by moving the crew out of the turret ring altogether.