New J-10 thread II

[crobato]

The fin just looks too straight even at that angle, and we have seen many J-10 pics before. There is something very wrong about the fin. Crash like that and there is no burn? That kind of crash would surely have ripped apart the fuel tanks. Another problem is that the plane's interior should have all sorts of yellow primer, not white. If you remember the KJ-200 crash, there were yellow all over the wreckage. In addition to all these, the section should have been hollow due to the air duct feeding the engine.

 

[PrOeLiTeZ]

I believe its a J-10S, though the crashed plane seems to be intact in the rear end to well with body.

Now why I believe its a J-10S instead of the J-10 is that the spine of the J-10 is flat for a while until the canopy but J-10S with the its streched fuselage the canopy is longer. And with some photoshop intesfying and cleaning the spine of the picture starts to rise pretty soon after the tail fin levels out with the spin. Which other J-10S picture show.

Just my input.

 

[SABRE]

There is something very wrong about the fin. Crash like that and there is no burn? That kind of crash would surely have ripped apart the fuel tanks.

May be a bailly landing gone wrong.

Plus is that Canard I am seeing on the front half of the aircraft?

 

[AssassinsMace]

That doesn't look like a J-10S. The spine is very pronouced on a J-10S. Unless the lighting is playing tricks, the spine doesn't stand out.

Is that suppose to out on a farm field or is that at the end of a runway because if it really crashed it doesn't look like there was a fire.

 

[Sczepan]

no fire - possible if the last fuel was lost, and - yea - it looks like crashed in front of the runway, possible the landing gone wrong;
so the plane coud be broken into some peaces

 

[maozedong]

But there is not the runway,very clear,it is a farm field,crops are everywhere,runway should not so close to the farm field,especially air force base,not looks like that.
Collision that is not necessarily a very serious, such as emergency airplane forced down to the field .

 

[Quickie]

Whatever the different sources may be, it's a composite picture. Why the lighter colouration of the broken tail section? ; why the lack of debris between the nose section and the rest of the aircraft? i.e. the grass looks clean. In addition, what are the chances of having the broken sections of the aircraft all lying nicely along the road over the grass field instead of having them all over the place during a crash landing?

 

[Pointblank]

Whatever the different sources may be, it's a composite picture. Why the lighter colouration of the broken tail section? ; why the lack of debris between the nose section and the rest of the aircraft? i.e. the grass looks clean. In addition, what are the chances of having the broken sections of the aircraft all lying nicely along the road over the grass field instead of having them all over the place during a crash landing?

The airplane could have went head first into the ground, that will minimize the impact zone debris.

 

[crobato]

That's won't explain the lack (or collapse) of the engine intake tunnel.

The picture seems to have more problems as it goes on. Why are the farmers all around the plane talking casually? If this is near an airbase, the fire control crews would be around the plane sealing it off from civilians and the wreckage being treated with foam to prevent fire. There would be all sorts of vehicles around the wreckage.

 

[Quickie]

The airplane could have went head first into the ground, that will minimize the impact zone debris.

Actually, from the start,I was assumming the aircraft had crashed landed in some farmland . A dirt road in a farmland cannot be possibly wider than a fighter jet wing span. So, even if the pilot managed to get his aircraft in line with the road, the debris should be all over the grass field.