Modern Heavy Bomber News, Pictures Thread (Non-Chinese)

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
I understand you have a B-52H model awaiting construction as well? Already anxious to see that, and especially what oad-out it will carry.
Yes...I do.

I am planning on loading her up with a full load of ALCMs. I will need to scratch build a rotary launcher and then find the 1/72 scale missiles to do so...but that is what I want to do.

I scratch built the rotary launcher on that Tu-95...the kit did not come with anything for the Bomb Bay. I am looking for some Russian ALCMs for the under wing stations for her and will then build the four pylons and put them on her at a later date.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Tu-22M, on the last pic with 2 AS-4 anti-ships standard number coz each weight 5 t ! can be armed with 3.
Only AF have Tu-22M, Navy don't have since several years, Tu-22M is the only Russian Bomber which can do anti-ships missions, Tu-95/160 are not equiped with anti-ships missiles.
Tu-22M   -2.jpg
Tu-22M.jpg
Tu-22M-1.jpg
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Boeing B-52 evolves again with guided weapons launcher

Until now, the slightly newer 1960s H-model aircraft has been unable to drop conventional, precision-guided weapons from its belly. The new digital rotary launcher changes that, by allowing each B-52 to carry eight Boeing-made joint direct attack munitions internally, and eventual extended-range joint air-to-surface standoff missiles (JASSM-ERs) built by Lockheed Martin and Raytheon miniature air-launched decoys.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Actually can be armed with 12 JDAM on its 2 external hardpoints, no LGB as B-1B which have a target designator pod.
With it after 20.
Or now same number for AGM-158B or AGM-154, 12 and later 20, in more armed in 2018 with new AGM-158B.
 

Scratch

Captain
The USAF wants a new radar for te B-52s. The current old ones seem to have mean time between falures that range in the two-digit hours. Really not a good state for long endurance platorms.
At least within the USAF, that decision seems to have been made rathe quick, the re-engine intention is still lingering.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Boeing B-52H gets new radar under $500M modernisation plan
  • 18 February, 2016
  • BY: James Drew
  • Washington DC

The US Air Force wants to spend more than $500 million replacing the outdated Northrop Grumman AN/APQ-166 mechanically scanned array radar on its 53-year-old Boeing B-52H fleet.

The old battlewagon, which ceased production in 1962, will not retire anytime soon, but needs a replacement radar if it is to continue supporting nuclear and conventional missions, says USAF deputy chief of staff for strategic plans and requirements Lt Gen Mike Holmes.

“It provides missions for us that are hard to replicate, primarily the range and payload,” Holmes said at an Air Force Association forum in Washington DC on 18 February. “The radar currently flying on the B-52 is limited by its mean time between failure.

“It’s an old radar. It doesn’t have the reliability we’d like to have, and if you’re flying long-duration missions and you get to a two-digit mean time between failure, it means you’re flying around with a broken radar a lot.”

The proposed B-52 Radar Modernisation Programme (RMP) receives $491 million across the air force’s latest five-year spending plan, unveiled 9 February, and even more money is needed beyond 2021.

It accounts for 71% of proposed B-52H modernisation spending through fiscal year 2021, which totals $691 million.
Holmes says the air force is still working through its radar acquisition strategy, but will most likely modify existing radar technologies and components to suit the B-52H instead of developing something new.

The air force has already replaced the legacy Northrop APQ-164 radar on the Boeing/Rockwell B-1B and has long considered doing the same for the APQ-166 on the B-52. A re-engining programme is also being considered to replace the B-52’s eight Pratt & Whitney TF33s (JT3Ds) turbofan engines, but that effort has not been funded.

According to the current radar plan, an analysis of alternatives will be completed in 2017 ahead of technology maturation and prototyping in preparation for a competition in 2019, according to budget documents.

If approved by Congress, 76 of the strategic bombers will receive new radars. Last week, Holmes expressed concern that the air force's wide-ranging nuclear modernisation plans, which includes development of the Northrop "B-3" or Long-Range Strike Bomber, become unmanageable in 2022 and beyond and will need to be considered by the next US government administration.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Found online a newer concept video of the PAKDA
Blended wing body... Almost a Lifting body 4 after burning engines twin vertical tails. they mention air to air missiles which makes me think they are looking at a arsenal bomber concept like the B1R ( Really Boeing a Bone-R?o_O) The concept was to rebuild the B1B replace the swept wings with more conventional ones replace the engines with the Raptors F119's replace the tail with a V tail reduce the RCS then load it up with a data link to communicate with fighters then load it up with Medium to long range Air to Air missiles.

How this could work is that a fighter formation like say a wing of T50's would be the lead element if they detect a large enemy formation like fighter bombers heading in to blitz attack, The fighters would call in the Arsenal bird to back them up.
The Fighters would open up with there missiles softening up the enemy formation by breaking them up. then the Arsenal bird using targeting data form the fighters would open up with it's large payload launching dozens of long range missiles BVR taking out large sweeps of the enemy formation.
 
Top