plawolf
Lieutenant General
No translations necessary.
Because Americans go to Mexico to spend money on a cheap place and Mexicans come to work in the US for cheap labor. Both support Mexico having a low quality of life compared to America.A lot of Americans go to Mexico for tourism
Mexico does not have the largest tourism in the world. There is no perhaps.perhaps the largest any where in the world.
Because it doesn't happen.I am not sure Mexico tracks American with menial work.
That's nobody's definition of competent.I consider Mexico a competent country that can receive so much Air traffic.
All the more reason the hard power of cash draws them here.Hispanic are upto 40% of US Construction industry which has highest wages in the world.
Whether it is legitimate construction or menial labor, they came to America to get paid more than they would at home.so not every thing is menial.
Those 2 are unrelated.If i take your logic that so many Mexican working in menial jobs in US and Mexico still has such large Tourism industry.
It's because Canada and America have more similar developed economies while Mexico is a complement being a developing country selling to developed countries. But demographics is hard power too.than how come Mexico become US largest Trade partner surpassing much larger GDP Canada. This is called strong demographic.
It's called CHEAP vacation spot with nice weather and beaches.upto 1.6m Americans reside in Mexico based on State Department and many more goes there for Tourism. even bad reputation of security cannot stop Americans from going there. This is called Soft Power of Mexico.
This is true; America is getting more f-ed up, so moving to Mexico to retire is a good cheap option to stretch your money.surge-reported-in-number-of-americans-moving-to-live-in-mexico-in-2022
Mexican population growing means more production, more things to sell and American higher GDP per capita means they can afford cheap Mexican exports. It's all right there.Mexico exports are strong. You dont have any answer how come Mexico currency got strong when Mexico Population is growing when next door US supposed to have much higher GDP per capita.
No, because the US has built walls and armed guards to keep Mexicans out.It should have drained Mexico of people and skills.
Read it. It's stupid and wrong as always.Read my answer above.
Actually, most of them just do hard labor because you need education to get a comfortable office job.i am saying where you get data those Mexican are the one looking for comfortable office Jobs that pay enough to have decent housing.
Yeah, Koreans/Japanese want comfortable 9-5 jobs that pay high and then buy big houses in America, which Japan and Korea don't offer.This what you started with Korea/Japan lacking that comfortable 9 to 5 jobs to afford decent housing and than blame it on lack of demographic strength.
Ok, "if"... the future is off topic and it takes a lot mre than software developers to make a developed country.If Mexico can keep there Software developers inside Mexico than i would call it a success story and real developed country.
Figure 3? It shows migrant caravans consisting of 600K Mexicans and 1M others.There is the graph in your data look it closely. It is barely 5% of Mexico population after 2010. It can have many reason like hiding from law enforcement in Mexico. Any country next to US with 5% movement is understandable over a decade if that country domestic population practically doubled since 1980.
He's South-African. He doesn't care what he does to Silicon Valley.He created Tesla but you dont see the consequences of his creating Tesla in Silicon valley. it is like sucking people away from other more important things in a overpriced location.
You have said more stupid things here in the last 5 days than any other member in the 10 years I was here. Elon Musk was, at one point, the world's richest man and he's self-made based on technology. You can see how funny it is to me that you think he's stupid, right?I cannot think of any dumb manufacturing CEO than him.
You can say it again and again but I always prove you wrong.Soft Power Influence that he made the decision.
What power did it get them? What, other than money from the event, did Qatar gain with this "soft power?" Nothing. Whatever they could do before they can still do now, and whatever they couldn't before, they still can't now. "Soft power" is useless.$200B converted into Soft Power of FIFA broadcasting. It is all about Soft image building.
IrreleventSure those trillions wasted in Mideast no one else can repeat it.
That has nothing to do with soft power but the hard financial power to afford the planes they want.Arabs dont want those planes thats why they were relegated to second tier nations of Turkey and India. Arab are pressuring to get as much wide body Airplanes. but on there own modifications that may be deeper technically than we understand.
I'm clueless because your answer is nonsense. I asked what Qatar can do that Kuwait cannot. Your answer is that people travel to the Middle-East and they have European footballers. LOLOL It's nonsense.The people travel to Mideast from many countries. and foot ball players they signed up are not all from Northern Europe. you are basically clue less.
They didn't feel that way in WWII. Then they got beaten into a pacifist by hard power.Germans feel that Soft Power is more important than Hard Power.
That's why they couldn't refuse Nordstream and the US had to order a terrorist strike on it to get Germans off? And Germany, of course, wanted to destroy its own industry so it can just buy things from Asia without the ability to make anything, right? You spin so hard you should start a powerdrill company, put Black and Decker out of business LOLIts America that is digging its ground to power Europe. Germany ideologically going green. it never really wanted LNG terminals. Thats why it asked France for Pipeline from Spain.
So either I have to provide hard evidence that the CIA rigged German politics or we should just accept your random imagination that German soft power is controlling the West??? Sorry, evidence and logic don't work like that.you have evidence of they taking orders or its German soft power that set direction for western consensus.
Defensiveso how come they signed up for Fighter with France if they cannot chase offensive military power?.
Supply and demand; if they got a better offer, they're most likely gone.salaries on those ranges are for top developers. they can have any other place and not deal with desert weather.
I'm mostly talking about engineers who work for their own country because they want to support their own people. This is a natural instinct, not soft power.so ideology is not Soft Power?.
"There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. Prolonged battle, even if it finally exhausts the enemy, is not a smart way to fight. A war of attrition is simply expensive and its costs will be felt long after the fighting has finished."First you need to understand swift victory is not desirable in every circumstance or the cost of swift victory can be enormous.
This is stupid and nonsense.we are dealing with 21st century demographics where every life is more premium than any time. Just adding body armor or some electronics to a human can deplete human physical stamina.
I admire very much your patience to engage in a debate with someone incapable of any coherent let alone cogent replies. The person or bot you're arguing with is not worth your valuable time and effort since the person is incapable of being informed and or even to adjust his thinking based on actual factual data. He's an ideologue. A zealot.Because Americans go to Mexico to spend money on a cheap place and Mexicans come to work in the US for cheap labor. Both support Mexico having a low quality of life compared to America.
Mexico does not have the largest tourism in the world. There is no perhaps.
Because it doesn't happen.
That's nobody's definition of competent.
All the more reason the hard power of cash draws them here.
Whether it is legitimate construction or menial labor, they came to America to get paid more than they would at home.
Those 2 are unrelated.
It's because Canada and America have more similar developed economies while Mexico is a complement being a developing country selling to developed countries. But demographics is hard power too.
It's called CHEAP vacation spot with nice weather and beaches.
This is true; America is getting more f-ed up, so moving to Mexico to retire is a good cheap option to stretch your money.
Mexican population growing means more production, more things to sell and American higher GDP per capita means they can afford cheap Mexican exports. It's all right there.
No, because the US has built walls and armed guards to keep Mexicans out.
Read it. It's stupid and wrong as always.
Actually, most of them just do hard labor because you need education to get a comfortable office job.
Yeah, Koreans/Japanese want comfortable 9-5 jobs that pay high and then buy big houses in America, which Japan and Korea don't offer.
Ok, "if"... the future is off topic and it takes a lot mre than software developers to make a developed country.
Figure 3? It shows migrant caravans consisting of 600K Mexicans and 1M others.
Furthermore, there's this right from the horse's mouth of why they want to come to America. It's all the reasons I outlined, none of your imaginary reasons:
Survey: “Why did you leave your home?”
- economic reasons 62%
- fear of violence 25%
- to escape illegal activity 4%
- lack of education 2%
He's South-African. He doesn't care what he does to Silicon Valley.
You have said more stupid things here in the last 5 days than any other member in the 10 years I was here. Elon Musk was, at one point, the world's richest man and he's self-made based on technology. You can see how funny it is to me that you think he's stupid, right?
You can say it again and again but I always prove you wrong.
What power did it get them? What, other than money from the event, did Qatar gain with this "soft power?" Nothing. Whatever they could do before they can still do now, and whatever they couldn't before, they still can't now. "Soft power" is useless.
Irrelevent
That has nothing to do with soft power but the hard financial power to afford the planes they want.
I'm clueless because your answer is nonsense. I asked what Qatar can do that Kuwait cannot. Your answer is that people travel to the Middle-East and they have European footballers. LOLOL It's nonsense.
They didn't feel that way in WWII. Then they got beaten into a pacifist by hard power.
That's why they couldn't refuse Nordstream and the US had to order a terrorist strike on it to get Germans off? And Germany, of course, wanted to destroy its own industry so it can just buy things from Asia without the ability to make anything, right? You spin so hard you should start a powerdrill company, put Black and Decker out of business LOL
So either I have to provide hard evidence that the CIA rigged German politics or we should just accept your random imagination that German soft power is controlling the West??? Sorry, evidence and logic don't work like that.
Defensive
Supply and demand; if they got a better offer, they're most likely gone.
I'm mostly talking about engineers who work for their own country because they want to support their own people. This is a natural instinct, not soft power.
Ideology itself is soft power and it's easy; anybody can come up with an agreeable ideology. But the ability to project that ideology, to show the world its results and why it should be followed, is completely dependent on hard power. That's what sets apart fringe ideologies and the ones that dominate the world. It's all hard power.
"There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. Prolonged battle, even if it finally exhausts the enemy, is not a smart way to fight. A war of attrition is simply expensive and its costs will be felt long after the fighting has finished."
- Sun Tzu
This is stupid and nonsense.
I stumbled by chance on the creators of this wonderful piece by scolling through the reactions on that hate spewing shit.Reuters headline. How much did they get from that US anti-China propaganda budget?
Congress Proposes $500 Million for Negative News Coverage of China
The effort to counter China’s ‘malign influence’ would fund negative coverage of China’s Belt and Road Initiative—while also beefing up the U.S.’s international lending.
Source:
You say Russia sells at a "discount", but the G7 countries are buying at a "surcharge". So both are losin
Europe had to shut down all energy consuming industries like glassworks, brickworks, fertilizer production, steel production, etc to be able to survive this winter. And that was when they still had Russian gas for most of the year. Europe will de-industrialize. There simply is not enough LNG or ships to transport the LNG in the whole world to replace the Russian gas they consumed. And it will take a decade to build the infrastructure if it does get built. In the meantime those businesses will go bankrupt.
Russia also has gargantuan gas storage capability which dwarfs the whole EU's.
Russia... the Russian narrative wreaks havoc on some, but we are talking about events of a short time ago, it is not something that happened 100 years agoWho was it that blocked Yamal pipeline
and bombed Nord Stream 1 & 2?
IVF is for people who can't conceive naturally. The baby still grows in the women and they still get the belly and stretch marks.It's been several pages of the Red Pill Diaries and I have no interest in extending this discussion. I've written enough about China's demography and I consider it a solved problem. However, I couldn't let this pass without comment:
Bruh! Didn't you say you were going to have four children with your wife using IVF because you didn't want to "ruin her figure"? Is that what these technologies are made for?
Don't be too harsh on @eprash for his unsophisticated proposals. There are far more feasible and effective solutions along the lines of what he wrote. The point is there's a lot of merit in taking existing technologies and applying them in novel ways - exactly as you have done.