Miscellaneous News

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
This sounds weird no matter how I read it.
First I beat you up, then when I stop, I expect you to be thankful and act in my interest.
That's the essence of an abusive relationship and considering the dysfunction of the anglo elites and their fail sons and heavily medicated children, i can't say i'm surprised.


Also, i can't help but wonder about the israeli decision to make a brou-ha-ha over CGTN was to increase their negotiating position in chinese led peace talks.

 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
That's the essence of an abusive relationship and considering the dysfunction of the anglo elites and their fail sons and heavily medicated children, i can't say i'm surprised.


Also, i can't help but wonder about the israeli decision to make a brou-ha-ha over CGTN was to increase their negotiating position in chinese led peace talks.
China has bigger things to take note than Israel. The whole Muslim word is united against Israel crimes this time around (sans the Arab govs lol)

This is a godsend opportunity for China to make it stand out on the world stage as friend and protector against Palestine while also rightly critising Israel.

I am sure that Israel has already noticed that this is nothing personal against them. This is the Muslim World leveraging their China relationship to draw it closer to their cause (diplomatically at least)

There have been rumours that Israel didn't consult with major powers (including China) before attacking Palestine, which must have also irked China a bit

Anyway, diplomacy is diplomacy and business is business
 
Last edited:

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
South Korea should make a strategic decision in the face of intensifying rivalry between the United States and China, an American expert said Friday, warning that Seoul has been increasingly isolated from the region's multilateral diplomacy due to its "ambivalent" stance.
More copium from the US, must be getting desperate. "Seoul" is doing fine, not "isolated" lol

And why should S.Korea choose the US, when Japan is hostile to it, the US promotes instability to N + S.Korean relations, having to withstand THAAD Chinese sanctions alone while the US sat back watching S.Korea economy burn etc

S.Korea will sit back, enjoy life, let China and USA fight it out, and just some moments before the result it will join the, by then obvious, winning side. Until then, "Seoul" as well as ASEAN, will remain neutral which is ok for China but not for the US
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
100% not.
All of your posts are driven by obsessive hatred towards capitalism and they are 100% not balanced or insightful but just attempts to blame everything on a system that currently governs the most successful and developed nations on earth.
Racism is not inherent, as we don't see small children display much racism until their parents and society influence them.
Some racism is inherent while others not. While small children may not know specific stereotypes such as "Asian kids are all good at math and poor at gym" until they make their own observations from life experience, it is inherent human nature to bond to what is similar to yourself and reject what is different resulting in social segregation despite no such legal binding.
People with Chinese chauvinism is no better than other chauvinists.
I don't know what better means but I know that if your race wins, you win in the world so I'm Chinese and that's what I support. There is no greater good here other than my side vs. their side. The self-righteous are those fooled by their government's excuse but I don't need such an excuse because I understand the down and dirty real world.
As Malcom X pointed out: "You can't have capitalism without racism".
You can't have a multiracial society without racism.
Class, in the last analysist, albeit not every single case, is the root of racism.
That can be repeated but it cannot be reasoned or evidenced. It is just your desire for what is true.
Take Russia, dozen of nationalities hated each other under Tsarist Russia, but united under the USSR, but broke apart again currently under capitalist Russia. Take Yugoslavia, three nationalities was united under socialism, but war broke out right after capitalist restoration.
They came together to try socialism, but it failed. Then they broke up. Arguing that socialism dissolves racism is like arguing that a bad marriage brings a couple together... yeah it did, for a few months, then they divorced and came out worse than when they went in because nothing worked out. There are no success stories to true, non-Chinese socialism.
It is not an accident, die-hard supporters of capitalism are often racist, openly or implicitly. While supporters of socialism generally are not. We can see that in the forum.
Die-hard supporters of true socialism, not Chinese hybrid socialism, are enveloped by their idealist fantasies, both in their expectations of what socialism can do to an economy and what it can do for racism. Supporters of capitalism, or more accurately, market economy, are realists who observe and analyze real trends that work in the real world rather than fantasize about a system that mainly governs failed states and inconsequential countries. We can see that in this forum.
 
Last edited:

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Can Iron dome defense protect taiwan from PLA missile strike?
Aha, you are actually asking a very intelligent question, well done. ROC actually had some serious thought about this question themselves and their military experts looked into this very thing. The concept is sound right: Iron Dome seems really good at intercepting Qassam rocket, perhaps it would also be very suited in intercepting PLAGF rocket artillery from coming across the strait.

Qassam rockets have some unique traits: they are dirt cheap since they're made in Hamas weapon workshops in people's garages using metal water pipes. Qassams are potentially launched in huge waves, they have abysmal accuracy (no guidance at all other than 'point the launch rail in the general direction of Israel') and have extremely poor terminal performance, subsonic even.

So Iron Dome interceptors have to be as cheap as possible to be available in numbers that would make a difference, and since Qassam have such poor terminal phase performance that's double incentive to keep the performance of the interceptor low to keep cost down.

The longest range rockets Hamas has used can now reach 120km, with Qassam usually go no further than 70km. On the other hand the minimum range PLA rocket artillery need to hit targets in Taiwan is 150km, and more likely PLA will be using rounds with more than 300km range during actual first wave attack. Iron Dome has been specially optimised to such a high degree against Qassam that they are very unlikely to be able to intercept this kind of proper military grade long range rocket artillery (nevermind even high performing PLARF ballistic missiles). ROC evidently agree because they looked at Iron Dome and then decided not to proceed further in buying it.

If you understand Chinese here's a recent video by Xi Yazhou on this very topic:
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Aha, you are actually asking a very intelligent question, well done. ROC actually had some serious thought about this question themselves and their military experts looked into this very thing. The concept is sound right: Iron Dome seems really good at intercepting Qassam rocket, perhaps it would also be very suited in intercepting PLAGF rocket artillery from coming across the strait.

Qassam rockets have some unique traits: they are dirt cheap since they're made in Hamas weapon workshops in people's garages using metal water pipes. Qassams are potentially launched in huge waves, they have abysmal accuracy (no guidance at all other than 'point the launch rail in the general direction of Israel') and have extremely poor terminal performance, subsonic even.

So Iron Dome interceptors have to be as cheap as possible to be available in numbers that would make a difference, and since Qassam have such poor terminal phase performance that's double incentive to keep the performance of the interceptor low to keep cost down.

The longest range rockets Hamas has used can now reach 120km, with Qassam usually go no further than 70km. On the other hand the minimum range PLA rocket artillery need to hit targets in Taiwan is 150km, and more likely PLA will be using rounds with more than 300km range during actual first wave attack. Iron Dome has been specially optimised to such a high degree against Qassam that they are very unlikely to be able to intercept this kind of proper military grade long range rocket artillery (nevermind even high performing PLARF ballistic missiles). ROC evidently agree because they looked at Iron Dome and then decided not to proceed further in buying it.

If you understand Chinese here's a recent video by Xi Yazhou on this very topic:

And if it did (highly unlikely) I doubt Israel would sell it to Taiwan

Imagine China would start selling/donating sophisticated weapons to Iran, Hamas, etc, etc
 

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

More copium from the US, must be getting desperate. "Seoul" is doing fine, not "isolated" lol

And why should S.Korea choose the US, when Japan is hostile to it, the US promotes instability to N + S.Korean relations, having to withstand THAAD Chinese sanctions alone while the US sat back watching S.Korea economy burn etc

S.Korea will sit back, enjoy life, let China and USA fight it out, and just some moments before the result it will join the, by then obvious, winning side. Until then, "Seoul" as well as ASEAN, will remain neutral which is ok for China but not for the US
That's the nature of a white supremacist anglo chauvinistic world order: All others must sacrifice themselves as livestock for the Chosen Ubermenschen of the white anglos.

And even if you cuck yourself hard enough like why Japan is doing, there's no guarantee you'll get all the perks of honorary white status because fundamentally, the white anglos fear ALL Asians. They fear justice.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

rioting in anglo american streets between rival mid east factions
 
Top