Top pinned post on Consul General Xue Jian's X page. Japan is currently struggling with a rice shortage.
I think Japan depends like 90% of their fertilizer and almost 100% of antibiotics used to prevent infection in surgeries from Chinese imports, not to mention heavy rare earths. So if China wants to, she can inflict catastrophic damage to Japan with minimum costIs that confirmed though that it would collapse those economies? China itself would also incur considerable damage as trade flows both ways (i.e. loss of export value). Trade with these countries accounts for 40-45% of total Chinese trade.
for the 999 times out of 1000 that they push lies, i'm not about to give a shit about the 1 time they tell the truth"lmao indians trying to steal credit for this invention now"
I don't know if you're referring to the twitter/x replies (and I'm not going to sign up to find out), but if by "this invention" you mean Arabic numerals, Indian claims of credit are *correct*. So-called "Arabic" numerals and other crucial mathematical advances, including algebra, actually originated in India and were transmitted to the West through Arabs and Persians.
It's a shame that claims of vimanas, nuclear weapons, etc. existing in ancient/premodern India overshadow the achievements that really did occur there. Credit where credit is due.
Awesome, now that b1tch's cabinet's domestic approval rating actually rises due to the b1tch's instigating a diplomatic scuffle with China!
Perhaps it's time to consider the avenue of hosting large-scale military exercises around the Ryukyu Island Chain and at the doorsteps of the Japanese home islands?
View attachment 164714
It's not about if China will also incur damage, its about comparative damage. The west runs massive ($600B a year) trade deficit against China right now, since the utility of western currency to China will go to zero under this eventuality, it will be a net loss to China if it actually continue to trade with the west.Is that confirmed though that it would collapse those economies? China itself would also incur considerable damage as trade flows both ways (i.e. loss of export value). Trade with these countries accounts for 40-45% of total Chinese trade.
But do you want to leave this to the last minute? At that stage, US vassals are ready to die by creating conflict against China, but US enemies.. are they damaging US in equal magnitude or even willing to create conflict at all? Apart from Cuba, there isn't anyone near US to create conflict either.
A hard embargo can involve a lot more than that, their geography is the same as WW2, but their population is now much larger. A hard embargo will literally be a humanitarian disaster on an unimaginable scale, and honestly, I don't think it's above China to do that to Japan.I think Japan depends like 90% of their fertilizer and almost 100% of antibiotics used to prevent infection in surgeries from Chinese imports, not to mention heavy rare earths. So if China wants to, she can inflict catastrophic damage to Japan with minimum cost
They should start with a soft embargo and gauge actual international actions in response, as opposed to rhetoric.A hard embargo can involve a lot more than that, their geography is the same as WW2, but their population is now much larger. A hard embargo will literally be a humanitarian disaster on an unimaginable scale, and honestly, I don't think it's above China to do that to Japan.
TOKYO/BEIJING, Nov 17 (Reuters) - Japan on Monday moved to tamp down an escalating diplomatic row with China over Taiwan that has prompted Beijing to urge its citizens to stay away from its East Asian neighbour.
Masaaki Kanai, the director general of the Japanese Foreign Ministry's Asia and Oceania bureau, will meet his Chinese counterpart, Liu Jinsong in Beijing this week, Japanese media reported on Monday. Kanai is expected to explain that Takaichi's comment does not signal a shift in Japan's security policy and urge China to refrain from actions that further damage ties, they said.