Miscellaneous News

tamsen_ikard

Captain
Registered Member
Awesome, now that b1tch's cabinet's domestic approval rating actually rises due to the b1tch's instigating a diplomatic scuffle with China!

Perhaps it's time to consider the avenue of hosting large-scale military exercises around the Ryukyu Island Chain and at the doorsteps of the Japanese home islands?

View attachment 164714
Her approval will keep on rising the more actions China takes cause of long term hatred Japanese have for Chinese. The more aggressive she is the more popular she will be. This will only change when Japanese are actually losing cities in fire bombs, not before that. Over many decades China can overpower Japan without a war with economic measures, and make Japanese see the light, but that will take a long time.
 

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
Its obviously the American (or should I say Israel's) intent to use Japan as fodder and, in their minds at least weaken China first in a proxy war, provide indirect support without exposure and only jump in after Japan is spent. But you can also look at this another way:

- Chinese calculus always assumed fighting US and Japan at the same time, theres no scenerio where US and China gets into a direct conflict with and Japan gets to stay unused.
- If US thought they can take on China they would be willing to jump in on day one along with Japan, so to send Japan up first is a tacit admission that they have no confidence even fighting along side Japan and is afraid of damage to themselves
- A full scale war with the US will require war time mobilization of society and industry which takes time.

So if US do send Japan up first instead of together, it can also be seen as breaking up the enemy into smaller easier to deal with chunks, while giving China time to mobilize in a relatively safe enviroment. It also opens the potential of US staying out altogether and China getting the oppertunity to neutralizing Japan without ever fighting the US.

IMO the main consideration for China should be to have full preparation for fight both at the same time. China need to ensure there is the strategic option of attacking American cargo ships trying to resupply Japan, and down American aircrafts providing support, but not expand to target US assets elsewhere unless they engage first. At the same time Chinese ships should be deployed far out into the Pacific, outside of Japaness threat range and in place to immediately engage all US forces if they join.

During which time China should also immediately mobilize the economy assuming there will be a full scale war with US, which, if the west provides Japan with any indirect support, include full embargo of any and all industrial goods from all Asian countries going to the west, at a level that makes RE and Nexperia embargo look tame. If the west's caculus is to weaken China before jumping in, then its counter is to make sure China actually gets stronger relative to them.

The entire proxy war concept rest on the assumption that the target do not wish to directly engage the proxy's handlers, e.g. its Russia's inability to fight NATO that allows NATO to operate their Ukraine proxy. If this assumption breaks down, then the proxy war turns into a piecemeal feeding instead. China should not attack the US unless they engage, but China should be fully prepared and demonstrate through sinking supply ships the ability and will to do so.
But you are neutralizing a pawn only while incurring atleast some damage, even if very little. The real instigator isn't incurring any serious physical damage (assuming US doesn't directly participate). US has lot's of pawns. Even if US has no self-confidence in winning itself, it can bog down China for a while (or longer, depending on how many vassals are ready to die).
I'm talking of vassals fighting without any intent from US itself ever participating.

Lol @ "suffer some damage".
A near term, limited HIC against Japan is exactly what I've wanted for some time now for the PLA to address by far their biggest remaining problem, self doubt & lack of confidence. Japan is the perfect candidate with their very high degree of equipment overlap with the US, everything from Aegis ships to munitions to fighter aircraft. To give them a taste of just how easy it really is to handle, under full unmitigated wartime conditions, each one of the overhyped, lackluster western MIC systems, everything from penetrating their AD to swatting down their lumbering cruise missile salvos to overwhelming them on the EM spectrum to dominating in aerial combat, with the corresponding PLA systems all of which are overbuilt in comparison. If it were anyone else but Japan I can easily see the PLA psyching themselves into thinking it didn't mean anything and the US would still be qualitatively different. But if this occurred it should inject some much needed appreciation for their own accumulated strength & confidence into their future actions & planning. That said, there is unfortunately always the risk of the US being dragged in with any such scenario, so I'm still indifferent about it.
You are missing the point.
 

Thecore

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 164700
Can anyone tell me what the fuck does "collective self-defence" means?

What an absolutely disgusting and shameless play on semantics just to falsely frame a blatantly offensive and unfounded military confrontation as a defensive one. That is extremely malicious and twisted, self-defence strictly means self-defence.
Japanese participation in the unresolved internal Taiwan issue all but guarantees 100% buy-in from the Chinese public. The Japanese are willing to lose the real war in the future to win the war of popularity today.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
Its obviously the American (or should I say Israel's) intent to use Japan as fodder and, in their minds at least weaken China first in a proxy war, provide indirect support without exposure and only jump in after Japan is spent. But you can also look at this another way:

- Chinese calculus always assumed fighting US and Japan at the same time, theres no scenerio where US and China gets into a direct conflict with and Japan gets to stay unused.
- If US thought they can take on China they would be willing to jump in on day one along with Japan, so to send Japan up first is a tacit admission that they have no confidence even fighting along side Japan and is afraid of damage to themselves
- A full scale war with the US will require war time mobilization of society and industry which takes time.

So if US do send Japan up first instead of together, it can also be seen as breaking up the enemy into smaller easier to deal with chunks, while giving China time to mobilize in a relatively safe enviroment. It also opens the potential of US staying out altogether and China getting the oppertunity to neutralizing Japan without ever fighting the US.

IMO the main consideration for China should be to have full preparation for fight both at the same time. China need to ensure there is the strategic option of attacking American cargo ships trying to resupply Japan, and down American aircrafts providing support, but not expand to target US assets elsewhere unless they engage first. At the same time Chinese ships should be deployed far out into the Pacific, outside of Japaness threat range and in place to immediately engage all US forces if they join.

During which time China should also immediately mobilize the economy assuming there will be a full scale war with US, which, if the west provides Japan with any indirect support, include full embargo of any and all industrial goods from all Asian countries going to the west, at a level that makes RE and Nexperia embargo look tame. If the west's caculus is to weaken China before jumping in, then its counter is to make sure China actually gets stronger relative to them.

The entire proxy war concept rest on the assumption that the target do not wish to directly engage the proxy's handlers, e.g. its Russia's inability to fight NATO that allows NATO to operate their Ukraine proxy. If this assumption breaks down, then the proxy war turns into a piecemeal feeding instead. China should not attack the US unless they engage, but China should be fully prepared and demonstrate through sinking supply ships the ability and will to do so.

Exactly, other than being sooner than China would prefer, fighting Japan now doesn’t actually carry significantly more downsides for China since as you rightly summarised, any war involving China and America will also involve Japan.

From an operational POV, China’s easiest policy is to establish a strict no-fly and no-sail zone suitably large around Japan, and enforce it with ruthless deadlines.

Anything that flies or sails into that zone will be engaged with overwhelming lethal force with zero warning. Doesn’t matter if it’s an unmanned drone or a passenger plane full of civilians, because you can bet America will play that card like they did during the Cold War, using passenger planes to test red lines and even hiding spy planes in the radar shadow of passenger planes.

Anything breaches the exclusion zones will get its first and only warning in the form of a PL or YJ missile exploding inside of it. If you send rescue planes and ships, those will get engaged and destroyed as well.

This may seem heartless, and it is, but if you are in an active shooting war, the time for hearts and minds is long past, and the only way you can prevent the situation spiralling out of control is with the deterrence established by the sheer power of your mailed fists and your willingness to use them.

The most tricky diplomatic problem will be South Korea. Operationally, it will be actually easier to just lump them in with the Americans and Japanese and steamroll them with NK and use SK as the primary invasion launchpad for the Japanese home islands. But diplomatically that might be a bad look. But to be frank, it’s hard to see SK being willing or able to go far enough to demonstrate its neutrality to avoid being obliterated. But I guess China will at least need to give them the chance to save themselves.
 

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
But you are neutralizing a pawn only while incurring atleast some damage, even if very little. The real instigator isn't incurring any serious physical damage (assuming US doesn't directly participate). US has lot's of pawns. Even if US has no self-confidence in winning itself, it can bog down China for a while (or longer, depending on how many vassals are ready to die).
I'm talking of vassals fighting without any intent from US itself ever participating.
If US provides Japan with absolutely zero support then Japan won't last long enough to cause damage.
If US does provide Japan with support, which is all but guaranteed, then China just need to make sure US suffer greater indirect damage than they can do to China through Japaneses proxy.
e.g. A full embargo on Asian export to the west, including Japan obviously, but also Korea and Taiwan will collapse all western economies, and western backing of Japan during their war against China will be more than enough justification to do so.
China can also simply arm America's and Israel's many enemies, e.g. actually provide Russia with direct military support and provide Iran with the most advanced weapons. China doesn't like to see its allies as pawns, but China do have allies.

Lastly you're also forgetting there is a lot of inherent interest to China in historically ending the Japaneses problem.
 

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Basically other countries want to copy China and have their own internet space/apps.

Funny how China was being bashed as backwards before. Yet now they want to copy it.

Another case of being ahead of the curve.
The person who wrote that article i dont think understand Putin. Russia has digital sovereignty meaning it can operate its digital space what is needed to run its government, research and manage this western apps to spy on its people. so what changed from before. It is called Soft Power and Rare Earth (down stream products). If Putin had known the extent and capability of this Soft Power inside Russia Putin would have run the country differently.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

25.11.2022

Russia declares it has achieved digital sovereignty​

 

AntiDK

New Member
Registered Member
Her approval will keep on rising the more actions China takes cause of long term hatred Japanese have for Chinese. The more aggressive she is the more popular she will be. This will only change when Japanese are actually losing cities in fire bombs, not before that. Over many decades China can overpower Japan without a war with economic measures, and make Japanese see the light, but that will take a long time.

I think it can happen sooner if the United States faces a brutal economic collapse within a decade which would dramatically change the geopolitical landscape as we can recently see Canada rebuilding ties with China even though it might not see the light, it need to put food on the table. I wonder if the AI bubble have enough burst to make it happen.
 
Top