On paper it looks like a disadvantage for China, but I don't think it actually works to China's advantage. One of the problems in working with power blocs is that it highly favors the established powers. It's just too politically costly for smaller countries to shift to the emerging power's power bloc because it can mean getting cut out from the markets of the other power bloc. If China were to form a formal power bloc, it's hard to see countries like Indonesia or Chile joining it. And yet these countries have China as the largest trading partner and their politics are likely to favor the Chinese viewpoint as opposed to the American one. Moreover, it also allows China to remain unengaged if these countries find themselves in conflicts with other powers.I remember saying the same thing some time ago, I got the feeling the Chinese leadership isn't interested in forming blocs or another Cold War. All that it does it plays into the US advantages. China will do well to turn down any stupid Yalta 2.0 agreement and continue downplaying any new Cold War, there's no cold war there's just a waning power trying to re-live its glory days and it's lashing out because it knows its best days are behind it.
Chinese rare earth producers shouldn't be suffering much. Currently China's industry consumes so much that there won't be much surplus production, and what surplus there is can be drawn into China's strategic stockpiles. Overall, the dollar value of the entire rare earth industry is very small - only a few billion per year. This is so little that it's easy for China to forgo the revenue yet it's utterly critical for a large host of industries so it's effectively the world's strongest bargaining chip.I think the more likely reason would be those rare earth processors in Jiangxi and else where in China are suffering significant losses as result of Beijing's export control. On the one hand, China's own tech industry will always be the biggest customer for the country's rare earth industry. However, export is still very important. Thus, my own hypothesis would be permitting sales to US and EU car industries (after verifying that the end users would not be military) as a way to ameliorate losses suffered by these rare earth processors. However, should there be evidence emerge that the end users in US, Japan, or EU divert their imported magnets/minerals to their respective countries' military industrial complex, Beijing could always cut off supplies at a moment's notice.
What I am looking for now regarding tomorrow's US-China trade talk would be if Washington would resume the export of C919 parts and some IC components/software/EDA in exchange of China maintaining the current (but licensed) of rare earth to civilian end users in the West. Yet, bans for defense end users would remain (meaning end products like F35s would have to get those rare earths elsewhere with higher price) in place.