Miscellaneous News

B

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
tokenanalyst said:
View attachment 148557
Click to expand...
Its not entirely out of possibility that China will make covert attempt.

Trump has proven to be a weak leader by not responding to China's economic strikes. The image he is projecting is someone who cannot even keep Canada or tiny Denmark in line, this is so unprecedented given these are de facto US territories. It would be like if a Chinese leader could not keep control of Hong Kong or Macau.

There is a hypothesis that the US military is much weaker than it's on paper numbers, due to old hardware and poor maintenence. Testing the hypothesis by delivering a limited version of a PLA salvo through "Yemeni" volunteers would be a low risk way of testing the theory.
 
G

GulfLander

Brigadier
Registered Member
Last edited:
P

pmc

Colonel
Registered Member
BillRamengod said:
Wait, I thought you said the Su-34 is using 5.5 and 6G tech, has the Su-57 fallen to the level of the Su-34 now?
Click to expand...
yes. Both Su-34 and Su-57 have similar functions of Strike as far is Ukraine is concerned. they added this Kh-32 to Su-34 (Kinzal is separate issue) and much more tech to Su-34 in external pods that cannot be done with Su-57. so there are things that Su-57 cannot do. it need too much reading and watching including Soft Power to come to this conclusion

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
It is noteworthy that last September, a Russian Su-34 bomber, using long-range Kh-32 and Kh-55 cruise missiles, destroyed a key Ukrainian armed forces facility.
Previously, only the Tu-95 and Tu-160 strategic missile carriers, as well as the Tu-22M long-range bomber, possessed these capabilitiites
Click to expand...
 
S

supersnoop

Colonel
Registered Member
GulfLander said:
Isnt this Byron acct like an anti CN acct?
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1904035221592510671
Click to expand...
I don't know about this guy, but it's funny to call multipatterning "brute force" and "low tech"
I am just a layman, but even I understand that multipatterning is extremely high tech and difficult to do efficiently.
The whole point of adopting EUV is to avoid the difficulty of multipatterning.
Intel used multipatterning instead of EUV itself itself (although maybe it was the wrong bet for them financially)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top