Whose idea was to invite him in the first place?
Whose idea was to invite him in the first place?
Its not entirely out of possibility that China will make covert attempt.
Whose idea was to invite him in the first place?
But (self proclaimed) democracies emit more than China. NATO emits more than China.Why not accumulated historically instead? After all, all damages now were from before right?
....
yes. Both Su-34 and Su-57 have similar functions of Strike as far is Ukraine is concerned. they added this Kh-32 to Su-34 (Kinzal is separate issue) and much more tech to Su-34 in external pods that cannot be done with Su-57. so there are things that Su-57 cannot do. it need too much reading and watching including Soft Power to come to this conclusionWait, I thought you said the Su-34 is using 5.5 and 6G tech, has the Su-57 fallen to the level of the Su-34 now?
It is noteworthy that last September, a Russian Su-34 bomber, using long-range Kh-32 and Kh-55 cruise missiles, destroyed a key Ukrainian armed forces facility.
Previously, only the Tu-95 and Tu-160 strategic missile carriers, as well as the Tu-22M long-range bomber, possessed these capabilitiites
I don't know about this guy, but it's funny to call multipatterning "brute force" and "low tech"Isnt this Byron acct like an anti CN acct?