The West has been spending resources since 1500, or since 1200 if we count the crusades, and treats it as an investment. It seems that they managed to gain territories, influence and worshipers around the world.I will add another reason which imo is the most important:
4. What is in for China's national interest to spend so many resources, economic, military, diplomatic along with reputational hit, geopolitical etc. What would be the gain? Would the gain be enough to compensate for spending all these resources and, most importantly, incurring such a tremendous opportunity cost?
And you believe these western propagandists?

And you believe these western propagandists?
According to Ministry to commerce published in January 2024 well before (impossible to hide), by the end of 2022 China's total accumulated investment in Syria was 13.24 million USD. That is 0.44% of what the western source alleged. To put things in perspective, the US spent $320 million in a floating pier in Gaza that lasted for less than 2 months. Even if we calculate in the fact of US being wastefull and cut the cost to 32 million, that is still 2 months lossing twice of China spent in many years.
As a reference, by the end 2022 China's accumulated investment in Iraq was 2.5 billion USD. The figure for Iran was 3.5 billion USD.
View attachment 140839
"China loosing whenever something happens" is a text book western propaganda. For example, China "lost" when Imran Khan get in office, China "lost" again when he was removed from the office. Or China "lost" whenever Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Thailand etc. change leaders regarless who is replacing whom.
This western talking point does have its success in causing panic and hysterial among many members here. But luckily China isn't a western "democrazy", influencing stupid mass does less in affecting policy than in the west.
Yes it is satire CNN's "Sharia Night Live" -with well-fed long term prisoners with manicured finger nails ,no scars etc.And families just conveniently there to milk emotional dividends-wow
Is this satire? /s
And she gets denied or worse unnecessarily medically injured/dead from health care insurance greedy nonsense-karmic comeuppance-I don't approve of Mangione's action ....but I understand.
Hope she doesn’t ever get sick and need insurance claims.
The West has been spending resources since 1500, or since 1200 if we count the crusades, and treats it as an investment. It seems that they managed to gain territories, influence and worshipers around the world.
Being passive in the face of this is asking to have your own territory partitioned between the powers.
The Crusades made the Italian republics the richest and most influential countries during the Renaissance. Then Spain came and invaded and crushed Italy during colonialism. Then France came and crushed Spain during the Enlightenment. Then Great Britain came and crushed France during industrialization. Then the US came and crushed Great Britain and all of Europe since the Great Wars.
The only way to become and remain a superpower is to compete and weaken enemies during wars.
China also has every chance of crushing the US. But being passive and just waiting for someone else to fall doesn't really seem like a way to succeed.
The last time China saw the West arrive and remained inert, it was only a matter of time for the Chinese to be humiliated and the territory partitioned between Europeans, Americans and Japanese.
When the USA's /west's "teeth" bounce off China's political/military/economic armour these westoids will turn on themselves and devour one another.The Putin strat.
China doesn't have a local partner like the US or Iran do. Iran, Russia and Pakistan aren't particularly local to Syria, so you're relying on a partner of a partner to do things. China also isn't geared for an expeditionary fight that far.
The Syrian people themselves are also unusually hostile to China. More than even Indians. Indians today begrudgingly admit they're behind China and correctly identify their regime as the problem. Syrians blame and belittle China while whitewashing terrorists.
So in summary, 3 reasons:
1. China isn't strong enough to project power to Syria in sufficient degree to make up for Syrias own weakness on the ground.
2. Syrians don't want to help themselves enough.
3. Syrians have looked down on China for a long time and are worse than even Indians about it.
They don't want China's help. They don't think Chinese provide value. And China can't exert the effort to help them as much as they'd like without weakening elsewhere.
That's the most IDIOTIC and FUNNIEST thing one can read coming from the retards that's Syria and Syrians. You lot can't even manage or maintain what passes for a country without a western overlord to essentially dictate to them what to do and what not to do. Not to mention the fact that any pretense of civility is simply based on their theocratic (majority religious folks) belief system imposed upon all people including the infidels. And they have the nerve to belittle CHINA? From the position of what exactly? And we're supposed to help those folks that openly mock China? Well, show the world how to govern according to your book and see how things unfold -- I hope for the best in the most honest sense of the word.Syrians blame and belittle China while whitewashing terrorists.