Miscellaneous News

AssassinsMace

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
The US Navy had two of their Aegis vessels separately in one year collide with larger ships than themselves with the fault blamed on their own crews according to the US Navy's own reports. What it sounds like is at least on one of them, the ship was on autopilot and no one was on the bridge because how do you not see a larger ship outside in front of you and you are to blame? Now how embarrassing and unprofessional would that be if that was what happened? If the US Navy had something before, they clearly have lost something since. The fact is the US Navy has never fought a modern naval battle. Their experience is 70 years old. Despite how there's a "Top Gun" that was suppose to teach US pilots how to dogfight, the US seems to be still dependent on firing missiles from long distances. Remember, the US Naval War College has been conducting wargame simulations of a US naval attack on China for around forty years. Despite advancement in technology and weapons, the US has lost every single one of them because they can't get past how China can produce and launch swarm after swarm after swarm of cheap anti-ship missiles. What is their naval experience going give them? How to broadside with their one deck gun? It's going to be a missile battle. Something the US Navy hasn't experienced with an equal foe. How's that for spin...?
 
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Lethe said:
The most compelling criticisms of both specific policies and actions of the Israeli government, and the Zionist project of which they are an expression, come from Jewish persons themselves. We are fortunate that there are many Jewish persons who combine a high level of historical knowledge, personal experience, and a strong sense of empathy and morality, often informed by their faith, such that they are effective critics of Israeli policy and advocates for the rights and welfare of Palestinian peoples. I am thinking of persons such as Noam Chomsky, Illan Pappe, Naomi Klein.

We are taught that it is the strength of the argument that matters, not whom the argument is coming from. I've been listening to the War Nerd podcast for many years now, and only recently learned that one of the co-hosts, Mark Ames, is Jewish, which casts his criticism of Israeli actions over the years in a different light. Perhaps it shouldn't make a difference, but it does. In the western cultural-historical environment where legitimate criticisms of Israeli policy are typically buried beneath allegations of anti-Semitism (and where such anti-Semitism does assuredly still exist), such persons as I described above, who can mostly shrug off allegations of anti-Semitism, are treasures beyond value.

One can look at polling numbers and other measures of aggregate Israeli and Jewish sentiments, the drift in the politics of Israeli society, and talk meaningfully about where those trends come from, how they have evolved over time, what the implications are, etc. But we should never fall prey to the temptation of easy, simple collective judgements and an inability to distinguish between persons, for that is a path that leads to the atrocities that we have witnessed and continue to witness throughout the world today.
Click to expand...
This is the reason why wars become self perpetuating; once war begins, noone really cares how it started, only that your friends and family and comrades are dying and you want revenge, it really becomes that simple of an equation. I dare say a lot of the jewish people who side with Israel do so out of a gut reaction of a sensation of being attacked rather than pondering the nuances of settler colonialism. In that sense, the war hawks in America are so eager to drag the US and NATO into a war with China because they know that once started, the war becomes self sustaining and difficult to extinguish.

Compare the reactions between the CPC and the Israeli government at accusations of genocide: the CPC invited islamic governments and foreign observed to Xinjiang to see for themselves the results of deradicalisation and offered transparency and cooperation in joint terrorism. The response of the spokepeople of the Chinese foreign ministry has been calm, reasoned, and factual because being a 5,000 year old civilisation, their responses tend to be for the historical record as opposed to the Sisyphean task of convincing a western audience already anxious over the rise of China. The behaviour and reaction of the Israeli government has been to mobilise their non state actors to silence opposition eg the Sanhedrin humiliation ritual against Musk.
 
BlackWindMnt

BlackWindMnt

Major
Registered Member
Chevalier said:

“The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born; now is the time of monsters.” — Antonio Gramsci​


This is effectively China and the US in the SCS:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

apparently, the USG has commissars sent by the US Elites to ensure that proper elite values ie rabbinic zionist judaism is enforced.
Click to expand...
They really are going to sell this its the dam AIPAC/zionist/jews that forced us to be monsters, uwu face...
Aah well it already worked for a Millenia plus so why wouldn't it work now.
 
L

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
US neocon/neolib regime propagandist Jake Broe is "concerned" about potential developments in Middle- and Latin America:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"I have no idea why this is not getting mainstream media coverage but the Russians on Kremlin State TV yesterday declared that Mexico was their military ally and they are wanting to place their missiles on Mexican territory so Mexico can attack the United States. This is insane." - Jake Broe

Personal Opinion:

Boohoo, for this neocon/neolib regime lover and professional liar. The neocon/neolib US instigates trouble in Ukraine, Taiwan, the Middle East and elsewhere and now suddenly when Russia, China or others respond to US adventurism(i.e. aggression) symmetrically they lose their minds. These lunatics need to be taught a very serious lesson. I would welcome a Russian or Chinese "missile defense shield" in Mexico, Cuba and/or Venezuela. It would greatly help to protect the eastern hemisphere from rogue "Peru-Bolivian missiles".
 
L

liamban

Junior Member
Registered Member
Laviduce said:
US neocon/neolib regime propagandist Jake Broe is "concerned" about potential developments in Middle- and Latin America:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"I have no idea why this is not getting mainstream media coverage but the Russians on Kremlin State TV yesterday declared that Mexico was their military ally and they are wanting to place their missiles on Mexican territory so Mexico can attack the United States. This is insane." - Jake Broe

Personal Opinion:

Boohoo, for this neocon/neolib regime lover and professional liar. The neocon/neolib US instigates trouble in Ukraine, Taiwan, the Middle East and elsewhere and now suddenly when Russia, China or others respond to US adventurism(i.e. aggression) symmetrically they lose their minds. These lunatics need to be taught a very serious lesson. I would welcome a Russian or Chinese "missile defense shield" in Mexico, Cuba and/or Venezuela. It would greatly help to protect the eastern hemisphere from rogue "Peru-Bolivian missiles".
Click to expand...

And also to fight the Americans until the last Canadian standing.

Not that I will be able to see it personally. I would have committed suicide by shooting myself in the head 5 times.
 
L

Laviduce

Junior Member
Registered Member
Australian turned Quisling Kevin Rudd on China-Taiwan Province-Neocon/Neolib US relations:


The amount of projection, gaslighting, hypocrisy, lies and deceit are once again off-the-charts. Mr. Rudd conveniently ignores the cold and hard truth that the US is openly trying to pry away Taiwan from China via hybrid warfare. He, just like his handlers, conveniently ignore the fact that countries outside the US and US vassal state sphere have national interests/rights and obligations.

I just wonder how and why Rudd decided to sell himself out to the neocon/neolib regime. Back in the days he truly seemed to have wanted good relations with China but that seems to have totally changed.
 
9dashline

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Laviduce said:
Australian turned Quisling Kevin Rudd on China-Taiwan Province-Neocon/Neolib US relations:


The amount of projection, gaslighting, hypocrisy, lies and deceit are once again off-the-charts. Mr. Rudd conveniently ignores the cold and hard truth that the US is openly trying to pry away Taiwan from China via hybrid warfare. He, just like his handlers, conveniently ignore the fact that countries outside the US and US vassal state sphere have national interests/rights and obligations.

I just wonder how and why Rudd decided to sell himself out to the neocon/neolib regime. Back in the days he truly seemed to have wanted good relations with China but that seems to have totally changed.
Click to expand...
Back in the day he never thought China actually had a chance of becoming #1 and toppling USA
 
C

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Laviduce said:
Australian turned Quisling Kevin Rudd on China-Taiwan Province-Neocon/Neolib US relations:


The amount of projection, gaslighting, hypocrisy, lies and deceit are once again off-the-charts. Mr. Rudd conveniently ignores the cold and hard truth that the US is openly trying to pry away Taiwan from China via hybrid warfare. He, just like his handlers, conveniently ignore the fact that countries outside the US and US vassal state sphere have national interests/rights and obligations.

I just wonder how and why Rudd decided to sell himself out to the neocon/neolib regime. Back in the days he truly seemed to have wanted good relations with China but that seems to have totally changed.
Click to expand...
Rudd was always a proponent for Anglo American hegemony. Back in 07 onwards, he belonged to the G2 camp that hoped to turn China into a bigger Japan ie a permanent junior partner to the Americans and when they didn’t Rudd got incredibly angry to the point of calling the Chinese “rat fuckers” because they wouldn’t accept constrained development goals at Copenhagen. The Chinese weren’t gonna compromise growth for the environment so the narrative went because the Americans believed they still excelled at green tech. fast forward to today and China is the worlds last best hope for an EV future and reversing climate change.
It was never about the climate or the stability of the world economy. It was only ever about power, specifically China giving its life’s blood and treasure in service to the Anglo American oligarchs.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

how do you guys feel about a future Tom cotton for vice president? It’ll be like a beanpole dick Cheney all over again.
 
Last edited:
mossen

mossen

Junior Member
Registered Member
Lethe said:
The most compelling criticisms of both specific policies and actions of the Israeli government, and the Zionist project of which they are an expression, come from Jewish persons themselves
Click to expand...
Sorry but this is nonsense. The most compelling criticism of brutal colonialist projects will always come from the victims of said projects. In this case that is the Palestinian people.

Your argument is like saying anti-war French leftists had the most interesting things to say during the Algerian war. Or American antiwar activists during the Vietnam war. People who are against their own country's policies during times of repression are brave, but this attempt to blot out the Palestinians from the narrative is so typical. I think it stems from a fear of being called antisemites.

Ultimately, if you center Jews even in criticism of Israel you are in effect privileging Jewish voices over Palestinian ones. I have lots of respect for folks like Mark Ames, Max Blumenthal or Gideon Levy. But I think even they would agree that the victims of Israeli colonialism and apartheid have more to say than they do.
 
Lethe

Lethe

Captain
mossen said:
Sorry but this is nonsense. The most compelling criticism of brutal colonialist projects will always come from the victims of said projects. In this case that is the Palestinian people.
Click to expand...

Let me substitute the word compelling for "persuasive". Here in Australia, at least, and apparently throughout the Anglosphere, Palestinian voices are dismissed outright. When Anglo folk speak on this subject they are at least only accused of antisemitism. Their careers may well be jeapordised by well-resourced lobbying campaigns, but they are not threatened with deportation or investigated by the state for alleged terrorist sympathies, which is what happens to Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims who speak too loudly on this subject. But only Jewish voices can escape the basic formula whereby criticism of Israel is held to be inherently anti-Semitic and should therefore be excluded from respectable discourse, which means that these voices play a crucial role in airing truths that many would prefer to see buried.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top