Context is very important here. Before the very first lockdown in Wuhan, there was panic and calls for some kind of quarantine action. Maybe some kind of traffic control in and out of Wuhan. But there were no mass demands for a comprehensive lockdown to the point where even people were not allowed to leave their homes at will. That kind of lockdown was unprecedented in modern history. Not even SARS and H1N1 made any government perform a lockdown like that. I'm not criticizing the lockdowns, they were the right thing to do at that point in time. It was just not expected by the common folks, let alone to be demanded by them.Lock down was a popular demand. People constantly made fun of foriegn countries dying by the mass. It only showed discontent when it lasted for years. Everyone was praising government for responsive action back then. Hindsight bias is happening for sure.
Even when few month before lock down was lifted, the prevailing opinion was that the protestors are selfish. Those who side with protestors are the minority.
When the first lockdown was implemented, the initial reception was not as popular as later on. There was so much uncertainty early on. But that lockdown prompted people in China to truly realize the gravity of the situation, hence they understood that the government was right all along, and then supported it. Later on, people accepted and supported other impending lockdowns around the country after they saw the situation in Wuhan. Off course, the protesters appeared, and were rightly lambasted for being selfish and failing to understand the situation.


