Yup. Instead of Project 2025 it finna be Deagel 2025.
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
What is project 2025
Wow. So basically regressing society to Gilead lite. Will surely be a fun time for 50% of the American population. Honestly, they can do whatever they want within their own home north American continent. But if they're hellbent on turning every military aged person into a weapon against China, then also we have more than enough production to neutralize every target they present to us.
The greatest difficulty is convincing a majority of Chinese people to carry out this undertaking. But we shall hopefully see such a shift in the consciousness in China within this decade.
PikeCowboy
Junior Member
This is actually state to provincial level ties, kind of appropriate
In the past, such disruptive and useless ministers would have physically removed from the world due to how much of a walking liability they are to the nation. The fact this Karen hasn’t been let go by now means that either the foreign forces their still want her there or the nation in question has been weakened so much that it is impossible to remove her in any normal way but given how unpopular she is, I am surprised that no one has dare raised a fist against this walking drama queen.
That figure from the USA must be plucked from their ass because in terms of harm and damage to the world, the world vastly outstrips the rest of the world by a factor of 1000. In the future if the USA collapses from all of its problems, how about the USA first be striped of its right to be a nation and have the rest of the world start stripping the USA of its wealth and treasure because it’s clear to the world that the USA is a walking liability to human progress and the rest of the world would benefit from this nation no longer being allowed an say in the affairs of the future of the world ever again. China brings hope for the future, the USA brings suffering, thus one can be removed from the equation and no one would miss them at all (everyone here knows which to pick)
Last edited:
Question for you.
How many of Needham's work, Science and Civilization in China, have you actually read?
Myself, I read maybe 100 pages. There was just too much. Back then there was like already 10 volumes.
Then he kind of added another 10 volumes, for over 20 volumes, of work (something like, I don't even how many volumes there are), all from ancient Chinese texts, all in the view of the lens of a Western trained scientists a prominent one, all he did was dig all the ancient to find all or any scientific thought of China and accomplishments of over 2000-3000 thousand years.
People may not always agree with some of his conclusion in parts of those volumes, but people from what I remember they were in awe that he was able to read everything, literary everything, write something like that.
What we are talking about here, really is a work that is like one of the Imperial Chinese Dynasty historical records. Inside a Chinese library, if we saw how volumes there are in the dynastic histories, that is what Joseph Needham was able to do.
Unless you are a prominent Western trained scientist, or have read this work of Needham's, or dug through ancient Chinese texts looking for engineering and science, then I cannot see how you can make those comments.
This doesn't really answer the question: what prevents China from adopting a policy towards a sanctioned Iran that is similar to a sanctioned Russia? Or in other words, why is deepening relations with Iran akin to burning bridges with the West, but not when relations are deepened with Russia whom now is more heavily sanctioned by the West?
A question for everybody, regarding Joseph Needham.
Who invented the suspension bridge?
The Chinese invented the suspension bridge.
I know that because I saw a picture in one of Joseph Needham's work. The diagram he pulled from some ancient Chinese text, predates any suspension bridge anywhere in the world for like maybe 100 years or more. There is no doubt the Chinese invented the suspension bridge. The evidence is right there.
That article posted earlier, written by some Western person, said that the Chinese are not good at going from 0 to 1 , but are really good from going from 1 to 99.
Inventing the suspension bridge, that is going from 0 to 1. There is whole history of innovation, in engineering and science there in China, and this what we are talking about.
Needham went out of his way to try to find it, it became his life this work of scholarship. Too bad I never had a chance to read more, because, life got in the way.
Who invented the suspension bridge?
The Chinese invented the suspension bridge.
I know that because I saw a picture in one of Joseph Needham's work. The diagram he pulled from some ancient Chinese text, predates any suspension bridge anywhere in the world for like maybe 100 years or more. There is no doubt the Chinese invented the suspension bridge. The evidence is right there.
That article posted earlier, written by some Western person, said that the Chinese are not good at going from 0 to 1 , but are really good from going from 1 to 99.
Inventing the suspension bridge, that is going from 0 to 1. There is whole history of innovation, in engineering and science there in China, and this what we are talking about.
Needham went out of his way to try to find it, it became his life this work of scholarship. Too bad I never had a chance to read more, because, life got in the way.
