Miscellaneous News

Randomuser

Junior Member
Registered Member
Democrats vs. Republicans is just a performance, a facade. The US, like virtually every government out there, is made up of an oligarchic core of political and business elites organized into ever shifting factions, which do not reflect the binary split that they present to the dumb **** public who can only be trusted to ever think in binary terms.

The neo-conservatives, who comprise the most powerful faction in American politics today, cut across party lines. There's both Democrats and Republicans among them, and they have command of American policy regardless of which president is in power. The difference between Biden and Trump is that the former is totally and obviously a puppet of the "deep state"; while the latter, having come from an oligarchic family and been a high profile executive in his own right, is more likely to influence "deep state" policy through his own political power.

People here should know better than to fall for the "democracy" song and dance that serves as a front for the American oligarchy. If you want to understand American politics, pay attention to the factions.
"The United States is also a one-party state, but with typical American extravagance, they have two of them."

You list many reasons for why China and all other empires fell behind the west. But colonialism really is the primary reason. Modern capitalism and incorporated companies were invented in the Netherlands with the Dutch East India company. Later, the British East India company started conquering countries in India and collecting tax and it's more than just a coincidence that the industrial revolution started just after the battle of Plassey. This focused the wealth of around 30 million Bengalis on 10 million British (in around 1800) and importantly gave the British a captured market that could only import British products but wasn't allowed to compete with Britain.

Capitalism and the industrial revolution are both children of colonialism. The Spanish only gained silver and gold from America, but the surviving population under Spanish rule was fairly small compared to the population of Spain in Europe and they weren't forced to take Spanish products. Britain gained human resources in India. For most of the 19th century, India's total GDP was multiples of Britain.

Western countries like to pretend that it's something special about their system, the rule of law, "freedom", entrepreneurialism or inventors etc. But it's really based on oppression and the Dutch and British East India companies.

Other empires just never managed to exploit a much larger economy than their own and grow through exports. China or the other empires in Asia would have needed to take the resources from all the provinces and focus them only on the development of one province to achieve something similar.

Luckily, you can use capitalism without a colonial empire to fuel it. That's how the US, Germany and later China rose
I mean can people not obviously see that Europre really started taking off only after the 1400s where the age of exploration took place? What a coincidence huh?

At the same time we see the decline of European influence after it has no more colonies. Again what a coincidence huh?
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Just how on earth are these Jews so powerful when there are so few of them?

And Indians keep thinking they are ones in charge. In truth they are nothing compared to the Jews and can be easily replaced as shown with Sunak.
AIDS can only happen once HIV has totally compromised the immune system. Similarly, the Anglo western governments allowed zionist groups and influence into power who in turn facilitated other Zionist Jewish groups in other nations. Especially in democracies.
 

SimaQian

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US hegemony and its perils​


US hegemony must be overthrown, I don't think that will happen peacefully. Let's see if Xi is the leader that will get the job done.
I dont think Xi administration has the motive or desire to overthrow US hegemony. Take note the national policies formulated for the last 20 years in China are heavily influenced by Wang Huning. The chief ideological mastermind of the party. He is no warmonger. Obviously this guy is heavily read on Chinese history.

What the current leadeship is doing now is they are trying to emulate the Tang dynasty Zhenguan era 貞觀之治, 1400 years ago, the peak golden age of imperial China. In imperial China, crown princes were required to study the policies of this period and all emperors performance were measured to Tang Taizong achievement in this era.

So what was happening at this time? Let see. Tang dynasty has just formed by overthrowing the corrupt Sui dynasty. China was devastated by civil war for years and the defeat of Sui China against Goguryeo Korea before Tang Taizong father stabilized it. The East Turkic Khaganate(Mongolia now and large part of Central Asia) was the biggest wolf of the era and was hungry for the spoils of China civil war. And literally extorting the Tang government for money to not to be attacked by the Turks. Taizong swallowed his pride and gave extortion money to the Turks. The Turks were funding left and right of Tang enemies to weaken Tang.

Tang Taizong early reign, focus on internal matters. Improving economy, strenghtening military while avoiding conflict with major powers. And the most important he did was food self sufficiency. His officials prepared for extreme weather in his time. And it happened there was a little ice age(possibly of major volcanic eruption in northern hemisphere) in his time where crops were failing for two years leading to the demise of Eastern Turks. No more food. And Tang Era survived and flourished.

After the demise of the Eastern Turks, Tang China become the center of culture for Central asia and the silk road flourised. The steppe people even made Taizong the Tengri Khan.

As we can see most of the policies for the past 20 years are in parallel of the policies in the Zhenguan era. They know eventually military power can reach parity with the biggest power in the era. But it is difficult to win when nature is trying to kill us.

So that is why the Chinese goverment is investing heavily on cleaner energy and food self sufficiency.

The Chinese leadership probably just wait and see for the US stumble on their own. The US enormous debt is a sure red flag that can bring down the mighty US.
 
Last edited:

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
language development has nothing with ethnicity. This still referring to this area.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Ashkenaz,” which denotes. “Scythians” in the Hebrew Bible, is already a tantalizing clue to the large Iranian. Ashkenazic Jews called themselves “Scythians” because this was a popular name in the. and “native” southern Caucasians alongside.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
You know who else called themselves Scythian? The Scots in the Pictish Chronicles, the Anglo-Saxons in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicles, and the English/Irish in the Ecclesiastical History of the English People, all of whom are Germanic (Scots being half Gael)!

Scythia in Persian is called Saka, and in Russian it was called Sakasen. German and Dutch call it Sachsen. English calls it Saxon.

Speaking of the Hebrew Bible, you have the order reversed. The Hebrew Bible doesn't denote Ashkenaz as Scythian, rather it is the descendants of Ashkenaz that are associated with Scythia. What the Hebrew Bible does say explicitly is that Ashkenaz is the son of Gomer [1 Chronicles 1:6]. And who is Gomer? According to the Talmud [Tractate Yoma 10a], Gomer is identified as... wait for it... GERMANYA!
 
Last edited:

_killuminati_

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

US hegemony and its perils​


US hegemony must be overthrown, I don't think that will happen peacefully. Let's see if Xi is the leader that will get the job done.
All China has to do, imo, is to continue doing what it has been doing, and not take the bait of war thrown by the Americans. Americans love war. They are good at destroying, but not very good at developing without it. Restrict their ability to wage war globally and they will crumble. Their entire economy is based on the war machine and the resultant chaos.

What I'm not sure of is whether the non-interference policy of China is good or bad. Ideally, it is better not to interfere in foreign politics. But it just so happens that China's enemies interfere everywhere and turn those countries into mini obstacles for China. Take Pakistan for example - despite having China as it's closest ally, it is infested with American and European interference in every sector and faction. Have you noticed: whenever a Pakistani leader is in trouble, they run to and seek assistance from US/UK, but not China?
 

henrik

Senior Member
Registered Member
All China has to do, imo, is to continue doing what it has been doing, and not take the bait of war thrown by the Americans. Americans love war. They are good at destroying, but not very good at developing without it. Restrict their ability to wage war globally and they will crumble. Their entire economy is based on the war machine and the resultant chaos.

What I'm not sure of is whether the non-interference policy of China is good or bad. Ideally, it is better not to interfere in foreign politics. But it just so happens that China's enemies interfere everywhere and turn those countries into mini obstacles for China. Take Pakistan for example - despite having China as it's closest ally, it is infested with American and European interference in every sector and faction. Have you noticed: whenever a Pakistani leader is in trouble, they run to and seek assistance from US/UK, but not China?

China should interfere in its allies and strategic partners, especially when the adversaries try to exclude China. If they don't do so, they will be at a disadvantage. For example, as the yankees enter into cooperation with another country, they always force that country cancel any similar existing cooperation with China.
 

quim

Junior Member
Registered Member
You list many reasons for why China and all other empires fell behind the west. But colonialism really is the primary reason. Modern capitalism and incorporated companies were invented in the Netherlands with the Dutch East India company. Later, the British East India company started conquering countries in India and collecting tax and it's more than just a coincidence that the industrial revolution started just after the battle of Plassey. This focused the wealth of around 30 million Bengalis on 10 million British (in around 1800) and importantly gave the British a captured market that could only import British products but wasn't allowed to compete with Britain.

Capitalism and the industrial revolution are both children of colonialism. The Spanish only gained silver and gold from America, but the surviving population under Spanish rule was fairly small compared to the population of Spain in Europe and they weren't forced to take Spanish products. Britain gained human resources in India. For most of the 19th century, India's total GDP was multiples of Britain.

Western countries like to pretend that it's something special about their system, the rule of law, "freedom", entrepreneurialism or inventors etc. But it's really based on oppression and the Dutch and British East India companies.

Other empires just never managed to exploit a much larger economy than their own and grow through exports. China or the other empires in Asia would have needed to take the resources from all the provinces and focus them only on the development of one province to achieve something similar.

Luckily, you can use capitalism without a colonial empire to fuel it. That's how the US, Germany and later China rose
The true origin of capitalism is, in fact, the Crusades. Soon after Italian city-states such as Venice, Genoa, Florence and Rome became the richest with competing banks and companies specialized in exploiting resources acquired by trade and their forays into the Byzantine Empire and the Middle East. Subsequently, the Italian states launched the Renaissance and influenced all other colonial powers in Europe to do the same, including finding new routes to the Indies for trade and exploration of resources. Everything is an evolution of that.
 
Last edited:
Top