Miscellaneous News

tygyg1111

Senior Member
Registered Member
No, they are correct in that calculation. Indians don't wish to return home for anything; they want to stay in the US. And the reason is because India is at such a shitty place in its development that there's no point in going back. The same problems would only happen with Indians if in the future, India somehow broke free from its incompetence and developed to became a rival to the US. That would probably spur Indians to see some hope and return home and thus, the same problem would happen with Indians. But as things currently stand, it is correct for the US to want to stop Chinese STEM and lean towards Indian. Problem is that they sounded really stupid, insecure and petty in the way they put it and also, quality is not the same so in an America where homegrown STEM talent is so rare, a heavy reduction in Chinese contribution could pull the rug from under the US while China stands firm by training our own students on the foundation that we have already built.
I have a feeling over the long run, having more Indians in US STEM will contribute to a higher rate of critical errors in key US industries (e.g. Intel), as well as a higher rate of academic plagiarism (e.g. Stanford copying Chinese LLM), leading to an eventual blacklist of Indian students meeting a certain criteria (e.g. Canada and Australia freezing Indian student visas due to them overstaying and working menial service jobs while never intending to attend class)
 

henrik

Senior Member
Registered Member
Did that son of a nice lady not notice several key things, Russia can easily help with self sufficiency due to the west pushing Russia to China for one and China is more then happy to work with them, China has already stockpiled several years worth of grain and food in case of a long war which most people knows quite clear is something that Europe and the U.S. hasn’t done by a long shot and also it’s true that the USA is self sufficient on paper but with the energy grid in a state of collapse and food insecurity climbing up due to all these natural disasters hitting their processing plants along with animal flu and many fast food restaurants closing down due to low earnings and busted up supply chains, I think this moron needs to realize that in a fight between China and the USA, the USA will yield much faster then China would ever do because with the manufacturing/infrastructure department basically dead in the USA, it will take decades to fix that shit up, which the USA simply doesn’t have, I mean that Baltimore bridge still hasn’t been fixed yet (you all know that China would’ve already done that bridge by now)


Their idiot schemes will fail in the end sooner or later because none of this idiot talk is actually helping Europe get out of its hole right now. I mean trying to provoke two nuclear powers into hitting you is like trying to investigate if Ursula Von de Leyan has any intelligence in that head of hers, the only conclusion is stupidity

China needs to stockpile more than a few years of food and water. Energy storage needs will be sufficient from solar, wind and coal power. China will then cut the US from the world's financial system.
 

_killuminati_

Junior Member
Registered Member
BUT bro do people believed them, I stop reading and listening to Mainstream western MSM and many of my friend do so, thanks to their disinformation many had question their intend. Their suspicion had been justify when Reuters reports about the US vaccine PSY OPS IN The Philippines, When you propagandized you need some truth otherwise it won't stand and like a house of card it will collapsed immediately.
Younger generation believes less. Older generations still believe it. And when the rhetoric is Chinese related, the belief is generally stronger due to a culturally-embedded racism against Asians that is more than a century old and found in every facet of society.

"I know this is gonna sound crazy" ... yeah, it does. It is batshit crazy. Afghan Taliban have never in their history attacked anybody inside Pakistan, even when Pakistan was aiding NATO against Taliban. Yet now, for just $10 million, they are killing Kashmiri militants (who have more or less the same views as Taliban) by paying Haibatullah??? And for whom? India..... the country that (unsuccessfully) begged UN to proscribe Haibatullah as a global terrorist. This is the type of statement you'd expect from "ex-CIA officers", the type rest of the world laughs at.

She is aware but does not want to say it that India finances TTP Taliban (unaffiliated with Afghan Taliban) and has been since it's founding in 2007. TTP is a product of NATO interference in the region; ironically, just like ISIS who has never targeted Israel, TTP has never targeted NATO in the region. So many NATO targets in Pakistan - embassies, consulates, NGO's, military bases - but their targets have always been Pakistan Army, children's schools, civilian infrastructure, etc.
 

_killuminati_

Junior Member
Registered Member
No, they are correct in that calculation. Indians don't wish to return home for anything; they want to stay in the US. And the reason is because India is at such a shitty place in its development that there's no point in going back. The same problems would only happen with Indians if in the future, India somehow broke free from its incompetence and developed to became a rival to the US. That would probably spur Indians to see some hope and return home and thus, the same problem would happen with Indians.
I saw an Indian report many years ago where they said that India borrowed this model from China: send large multitudes of students abroad to study with the hope that atleast even 5% return. They said it worked for China, hence adopting the model in India as well. But you are right in that nobody wants to return to India (except maybe that small percent?).. which brings me to the question of what exactly motivated that small percent to return to China in it's earlier poor/underdeveloped days?
 

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
I saw an Indian report many years ago where they said that India borrowed this model from China: send large multitudes of students abroad to study with the hope that atleast even 5% return. They said it worked for China, hence adopting the model in India as well. But you are right in that nobody wants to return to India (except maybe that small percent?).. which brings me to the question of what exactly motivated that small percent to return to China in it's earlier poor/underdeveloped days?
The 1000 talent program. Government incentives and grants, subsides, stimulus for economic growth, and it snowballs from there.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
They really are dumb. They actually think somehow the same problems are not going to happen with Indians. Maybe they're not as competent but they're still going to do self serving stuff. Given how so much stuff is being outsourced from the west, Im surprised these dumb leaders are not being lynched as traitors by their own people.

But hey democracy right? You guys chose them so deal with it. No pity from me.

I wrote “Xi Jinping” on my ballot, but it wasn’t enough
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
The more far rights gains in Europe, the more EU will start to break apart. A few far right governments will break the western alliance into two camps. Eventually China and Russia can exploit this, ally with the far right governments and ensure balance of power politics returns in Europe.
you don't understand the European Right at all. Look at Poland or maybe just read some simple books.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In practice, the philosophy of Atlanticism encourages active North American, particularly American, engagement in Europe and close cooperation between states on both sides of the ocean.

Atlanticism varies in strength from region to region and from country to country based on a variety of historical and cultural factors. It is often considered to be particularly strong in Eastern Europe, Central Europe, Ireland and the United Kingdom (linked to the Special Relationship). Politically, it has tended to be associated most heavily and enthusiastically but not exclusively with classical liberals or the political right in Europe. Atlanticism often implies an affinity for U.S. political or social culture, or affinity for Europe in North America, as well as the historical bonds between the two continents.
 
Top