Miscellaneous News

coolgod

Major
Registered Member
The Chinese government better not let vivo sell what ever technology it has to tata. Vivo should grow a spine and rather leave the country than to be taken over on the cheap. There must be more to it, otherwise they company is just stupid at best, traitorous at worst.
India has detained (kidnapped) many chinese executives from Chinese tech companies, including vivo, xiaomi etc. Sadly these sales are 100% forced, China's policies towards India needs a major rework.
 

dingyibvs

Junior Member

This is par for the course for the Anglo American elites; they imprison people on trumped up charges eg Meng WenZhou and are eventually forced into a face saving 'plea bargain' and release when politics necessitates it. Biden did it for votes for the election and Meng was released as a precondition for Chinese talks.

At this stage, any Chinese companies that invest or set up factories in India are betraying the Chinese nation since they are effectively handing over Chinese tech and jobs to Indians who want to kill Chinese people and take Chinese lands. They deserve all the scorn heaped on them; the type of chinese 'entrepreneur', the jack Mas and Vicky Zhaos of the world who care more for money and white approval than helping Chinese people and aiding the rejuvenation of China.
It's the job of a capitalist to be a good capitalist, it's a country's government's job to make sure capitalism works for its country.
 

Chevalier

Senior Member
Registered Member

White americans and their indian middle managers aren't going to be allowed to sweep their plagiarism and BS under the carpet. Why they demur at using that 'freedom' and 'liberal democracy' to innovate better is a complete mystery to me, but not as big of a mystery as to why the 'ashkenazi high IQ' failed to allow the anglosphere to innovate better.


y'know, this whole 'take China down and we'll induct you into NATO'/'take Russia down and we'll induct you into NATO' is typical of the bait and switch/impossible task preconditions that the anglo led west excels in to take advantage of naive natives. It's no different to european colonisers convincing foreign converts into giving them land and gold in return for 'heavenly paradise' or in modern times, cults promising you the world if you give them your earth belongings and wealth. The con is to cheat the victim out of their possessions and birthright.

WSJ makes claim that Europe is making hedge with being a little more cooperative with China trade in a case a possibility of Trump being re-elected.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Europe had their chance with CAI and even then they couldn't help themselves and had to sanction China and indulge in the masturbatory exercise of moral grandstanding. A sharp lesson of poverty and knowing what true grit means for the european elites is in order.
 

Rank Amateur

Junior Member
Registered Member
Rank Amateur said:
"Do you see the West talk how "we all" get hurt? The Chinese seems to think expressing how weak or how hurt you are is suppose to garner sympathy and those doing the harm are suppose to stop. The only thing the West sees when Chinese do that is what they're doing is working and you think they'll stop? That's also naive to think that they care."

Another way to look at it is that the Chinese are giving a veiled warning.

China's words to the West: Hey, what you're doing is going to hurt all of us.

What China really means: You know, what you're doing is going to hurt *you*.

That is, after all, what consistently happens. (1) The West tries something against China. (2) China issues some milquetoast objection. (3) The West's actions result in China getting stronger.

"I mentioned before about Huawei founder, Ren Zhengfei, when the US was attacking and sanctioning his company, he would publicly cry how US actions were hurting his company pleading for the US to stop. Today Huawei is making more money than ever without the US and Western countries and their allies as customers."

Your Huawei example is a case in point.
Sorry I don’t believe this is some Sun Tzuzian approach.

Ren Zhengfei had no other choice.

1. "Sorry I don’t believe this is some Sun Tzuzian approach."

I'm not saying that when the Chinese speak on such matters, they're pursuing some 3D-chess strategy from the Art Of War; that their protests are insincere; that they're actually trying to goad the West into taking the actions China is objecting to. I'm instead proposing that they really do hope that the West will reverse course and everyone will get along (win-win!), but they're also thinking that if the West refuses, they're going to see to it that China comes out ahead. And to quote myself: "That is, after all, what consistently happens. (1) The West tries something against China. (2) China issues some milquetoast objection. (3) The West's actions result in China getting stronger."

2. "Ren Zhengfei had no other choice."

The same can be said of all the other times when, rejected or cut off by the West, China had to go it alone and succeeded: satellites, Beidou, the space station, aero-engines and other military technology, etc. Would you criticize China for those occasions too?
 
Last edited:

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
1. "Sorry I don’t believe this is some Sun Tzuzian approach."

I'm not saying that when the Chinese speak on such matters, they're pursuing some 3D-chess strategy from the Art Of War; that their protests are insincere; that they're actually trying to goad the West into taking the actions China is objecting to. I'm instead proposing that they really do hope that the West will reverse course and everyone will get along (win-win!), but they're also thinking that if the West refuses, they're going to see to it that China comes out ahead. And to quote myself: "That is, after all, what consistently happens. (1) The West tries something against China. (2) China issues some milquetoast objection. (3) The West's actions result in China getting stronger."

2. "Ren Zhengfei had no other choice."

The same can be said of all the other times when, rejected or cut off by the West, China had to go it alone and succeeded: satellites, Beidou, the space station, aero-engines and other military technology, etc. Would you criticize China for those occasions too?
1. Well I’m saying it’s unnecessary to make a comment. Just do it! Huawei has demonstrated it can survive without the West.

2.. Since you seem to be new I’ll let you know I’m a big critic of anytime China whines to be included in the West’s reindeer games because I have confidence China can go it alone to the least without the West.
 

Rank Amateur

Junior Member
Registered Member
1. Well I’m saying it’s unnecessary to make a comment. Just do it! Huawei has demonstrated it can survive without the West.

2.. Since you seem to be new I’ll let you know I’m a big critic of anytime China whines to be included in the West’s reindeer games because I have confidence China can go it alone to the least without the West.

"Since you seem to be new ..."

I'm not "new." Don't be condescending.

"... I’ll let you know I’m a big critic of anytime China whines to be included in the West’s reindeer games"

Yes, I'm well aware of that. Like I said, I'm not "new" here.
 
Last edited:

Randomuser

Junior Member
Registered Member

plawolf

Lieutenant General
The Chinese government better not let vivo sell what ever technology it has to tata. Vivo should grow a spine and rather leave the country than to be taken over on the cheap. There must be more to it, otherwise they company is just stupid at best, traitorous at worst.

It’s an expensive lesson, but Chinese are not stupid either. Most of the ‘manufacturing’ done in India is really just assembling core components imported from China.

This is where Indian greed is fucking themselves over. All of the offshoring of actual core manufacturing only happens much further down the line after companies have made massive and sustained profits in a region to justify the additional investment.

Had this happens 10-20 years down the line, then there would be a genuine risk of loss of core technology through such daylight robbery. But as things stand, they just have an assembly business that is a useless waste of space without the components needed to actually assemble the phones. Guess who makes the components and who will absolutely be adding a massive ‘fuck you right back’ margin on top of exports to those Indian assembly operations?
 
Top