From my experience Chinese government care more about public opinion than west. The latter can just blatantly lie, even though theoritically public opinion has greater influence in a democracy. It is not reflected in practice due to media control.Decreased by a small margin. But still above 70%, which is the benchmark for "landslide" approval. Western politicians would kill to get even 50% approval rating. Don't be fooled by the Western mindset that the Chinese government is obsessed with public approval. The Chinese government are long term thinkers, and they do what is right for China first, even if that hurts its ratings in the short term. They would listen to the local officials talking about real issues rather than worrying about approval numbers. They want to solve the real issues first, even if that pisses off millions of Chinese citizens. The average Chinese will disapprove of government measures that hurts them in the short term, but would be beneficial for the longer term. When they finally enjoy the long term benefits, then they'll give the government their due approval.
Good governments always do what is right for the nation. They don't always do what is popular. What is popular is not always good for the country. Tax cuts and free handouts are some of the most effective ways to make you popular. But are they good for the country? The Indian government gives free food handouts to 800 million Indians. If you trust India's numbers, Modi is incredibly popular, hovering around 70% approval rating. A very popular move, but did Modi did the right thing for India in the long term? Handing out free food for the poor appears noble, but why are there still so many poor people in India even to this day? Its because Modi had failed to lift them out of poverty after almost 10 years in power. So he is giving out free food to keep the impoverished masses happy and sweep his policy failures under the carpet.
Popularity is not everything. Long term planning, decisive action, wisdom, and good governance is what truly matters. Fortunately China is not an electoral democracy. The CPC could appoint China's leaders by merit, without concern for poll ratings. If China was an electoral democracy, then there is a high chance that they vote into power not real leaders, but politicians. There are exceptions, but in general, short-term thinking, self-interested politicians tend to do better in electoral democracies than actual leaders. That kind of political system will decrease the quality of China's leadership and severely impede China's rise to become a new superpower.
The Chinese government does care about public opinion. But they are not obsessed about it. That is why they were able to do unpopular, but necessary things like the Covid lockdowns, no bailouts for the big developers, video game restrictions on minors, bans on unregulated education businesses, censorships, and affirmative actions. Many of these actions don't sit well with a large section of the Chinese populace. They'll be angry at the government in the shorter term, and can only appreciate these policies in the longer term.From my experience Chinese government care more about public opinion than west. The latter can just blatantly lie, even though theoritically public opinion has greater influence in a democracy. It is not reflected in practice due to media control.
The difference is China can plan for long term despite managing public opinion. Western government cannot plan long term regardless of how favorable public opinion is.
Nonsense. Covid lock down was the public demand. You clearly forgot the panic back then. That is reason behind long delay.The Chinese government does care about public opinion. But they are not obsessed about it. That is why they were able to do unpopular, but necessary things like the Covid lockdowns, no bailouts for the big developers, bans on out-of-school education businesses, and affirmative actions. Many of these actions don't sit well with a large section of the Chinese populace. They'll be angry at the government in the shorter term, and can only appreciate these policies in the longer term.
Western governments, and other Western-style democracies are all obsessed about poll numbers. They spend the majority of their term in office to win the next election, hence their short term mindsets. Electoral democracies in the 3rd world are the worse types of governments for their people. It is fairly easy to appease the desperate and uneducated masses to get their votes. They can be angry about a politician for years, then on polling day, they get free handouts, and they'll vote for that same idiot again. That's why those nations can't go far.
Nonsense. You clearly don't remember the early parts of 2020 do you? There was panic, but there was no mass demands for a lockdown before it was implemented.Nonsense. Covid lock down was the public demand. You clearly forgot the panic back then. That is reason behind long delay.
He has got limited tastes. Taiwan's pineapples are not the best in the world anyway. You can find much better pineapples in SEA. And they're cheaper. He clearly hasn't tried Thai or Malaysian pineapples.The latest thorn in Taiwan-China tensions: pineapples
March 7, 2024
file photo
From my experience Chinese government care more about public opinion than west. The latter can just blatantly lie, even though theoritically public opinion has greater influence in a democracy. It is not reflected in practice due to media control.
The difference is China can plan for long term despite managing public opinion. Western government cannot plan long term regardless of how favorable public opinion is.
Arabs invested money in Trump when he was down and complaining that American Jews dont love Israel. Gulf Arabs didnot care at time that Trump will make a come back. I cannot spoon feed the topic if you dont have that indepth knowledge about Gulf Arabs.Trump = deals = money. He also doesn't give a shit how many reporters or dissidents the Saudis chop up. All hard power, nothing to do with anything soft
Elon is wealthy and not with same women to have 7 kids. thats difference in family values. I mean real data. not the data that is published. Crimea is included in that part. this is the demographic that is driving the policies.I have no idea what the f you're talking about with 1 dude who had 60 kids or Putin having 7. Elon has 13; what does that have to do with anything? Here's Russia's birth rate. Shows absolutely no upward trend, Saudi, Muslim, Arab, completely irrelevent.
Putin “included” the occupied territories in the Southern Military District: what does this indicate?
that sustain 130m sq of housing per year. single family will be in addition as that individual choice. last time they made like half a million single family homes a year.Building cities don't mean increased population; China's population isn't growing and we're the biggest city builders in the world. Doesn't matter what the cities look like; they don't change anyone's allegiance. And even it they did, construction takes money and capability, all hard power metrics. Soft power doesn't exist.
Puahahaha LOLOL Yeah it's really "sophisticated" and "complicated" to run faster than Usain Bolt or swim faster than Michael Phelps and I don't "want" to do it. Clown.
You can start by writing a single example that makes sense but you can't.
In Russia, they will begin to massively build standard villages with low-rise buildings
Good news everyone...
Paid 7 million for definitely not spying/being tricked into spying