More accurately, they should be compared to the US backed afghan warlords, uncivilized semites who practice institutional child rape and bronze age warfare.
Last edited:
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Oh it’s way easier than that. There are just some easily detachable counter weights that are there to ensure it follows international arms export regulations. Do not, I repeat, do not remove them under any circumstances.
plawolf
Lieutenant General
Do not remove or all consequences that result are your own to bear.
Job market for tech is extremely hard right now. Most men there are not going for politics virtue signaling but are legit looking for jobs because most of them, even highly educated ones with years of experience, are only 3-4 paychecks away from homelessness.
The issue (at least for China) is that as very few are interested in trying dog meat, let alone have it as a staple in their diet, there are less and less farmers who can deliver it at market demanded standards. Similar to the west, where the consumption of opossum and other rodent types were once widespread, but fell off sharply, or the southern European countries which had some types of mouldy cheese, where the quality cannot be guaranteed anymore either.
The standards are meant to be enforced equally and fairly, to make sure food is healthy and long term safe for the consumers. It would be hypocritical to ban consumption of unsafe American meat and dairy while allowing unsafe products to remain on sale just because they're domestic Chinese. That's not the point of the standards.
Either dog meat must undergo rabbitization, becoming more widespread among the public to justify profitable, high quality farming, or it will go the way of rattlesnakes and opposums and disappear as a historical curiosity and something for extreme cooking.
The way society looks currently, the latter is much more likely. Some things just follow the tides and trends of the times. Many types of food have been failed out due to unpopularity, I don't see it as concerning at all, rather it's natural.
Last edited:
China can make it's own independent decision such as banning wild life trade and consumption right after the pandemic, irrespective of Western lecturing and pressure. It's based on China's own sovereign decision and scientific evidence, not influence by Western politicians.
If China said one day domesticated dog and cat consumption is banned because they breed and spread SAR-CoV-2 and other disease, thus unfit for human consumption , then it's ultimately a Chinese sovereign decision and science, not foreign pressuring.
If China said one day domesticated dog and cat consumption is banned because they breed and spread SAR-CoV-2 and other disease, thus unfit for human consumption , then it's ultimately a Chinese sovereign decision and science, not foreign pressuring.
They don't spread these diseases, that's wholly unscientific beliefs, I'm frankly baffled where anyone would get that from.
There are well founded worries on how closely dog farms adhere to general animal husbandry criterias. Meat that has not been processed in safe ways will cause gastrointestinal sickness in those who consume it.
Polonez is from Belarus with Chinese tech inside. If Belarus is able to increase the range on their own, China can't object. In reality, it is probably Chinese engineers telling Belarussians how to increase the range without officially doing so. More importantly, increasing range is easy to do if the base model (where it is derived) has greater range. There isn't really anything China need to do officially. It is perfect deniability.
This is the reason that China refuse to join any treaty agreement with US in arms control.
May there be extra fuel tanks on Taobao.
Last edited: