Miscellaneous News

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
India's endeavor to "decouple" from China in the supply chain for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), the biologically active components of medicines, will be costly for the Indian and global pharmaceutical industry, Chinese industry insiders cautioned. There may be an impact on the final market prices of medicines.
Some drugmakers in India are reportedly seeking to limit their reliance on Chinese contractors that produce drugs used in clinical trials and early-stage manufacturing, Reuters reported on Monday.
Please do it India! No more Chinese APIs. Do it for Atmanirbhar Bharat!

If India wants to destroy the competitiveness of its own pharma industry, they should be allowed to do so. It keeps China's hands clean and opens new opportunities for Chinese pharma companies. Chinese API who loss sales to the Indian market should look for other buyers, and even local buyers. Chinese pharmaceuticals can start to buy up those APIs and compete with Indian pharmas with better pricing.
 

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I must say as a Shanghainese I've long resented Hong Kong buying the best hairy crabs straight from Yangcheng Lake before Shanghai even get a chance. I suppose though if they are in fact paying many times the price that mainlanders pay then fair enough. But looks like even that is changing now.

Also WTF? They boil hairy crab in Hong Kong instead of steam? What kind of barbarism is this?
British culinary pollution
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please do it India! No more Chinese APIs. Do it for Atmanirbhar Bharat!

If India wants to destroy the competitiveness of its own pharma industry, they should be allowed to do so. It keeps China's hands clean and opens new opportunities for Chinese pharma companies. Chinese API who loss sales to the Indian market should look for other buyers, and even local buyers. Chinese pharmaceuticals can start to buy up those APIs and compete with Indian pharmas with better pricing.
Funny that, “friend shoring” simply allows other countries to become middlemen for China. In a way, it allows other nations to grow and develop…at western expense as it is the Americans who have to pay higher prices for the same goods, still made in China, packaged in ASEAN.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

incidentally, isn’t it funny the Uighur hoax started rearing up just when Israel needs the heat taken off it for bombing hospitals and murdering children.
Almost as strange how seemingly random Muslim instigated terrorist attacks occured in both Ireland and France.,,
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Funny that, “friend shoring” simply allows other countries to become middlemen for China. In a way, it allows other nations to grow and develop…at western expense as it is the Americans who have to pay higher prices for the same goods, still made in China, packaged in ASEAN.
Good. China doesn't lose exports. More inflation for the West, and more money for ASEAN. India cannot be a middleman anyway for Chinese goods, so its out of that gravy train.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

incidentally, isn’t it funny the Uighur hoax started rearing up just when Israel needs the heat taken off it for bombing hospitals and murdering children.
Almost as strange how seemingly random Muslim instigated terrorist attacks occured in both Ireland and France.,,
Those ETIM idiots have loss complete credibility in the Muslim world by U-turning and then standing with Israel. The Uighur hoax has lost so much relevance today, nobody even cares anymore. Especially the Muslims.

I dunno too much about those Muslim instigated terrorist attacks, other than that they do appear random. We could expect to see more Charlie Hebdo-like attacks as these things always happen when the West enrages the Muslim world.

The West had been trying to cynically redirect Muslim hate on China. Hoping for more attacks on China than on themselves. I'm relieved to see that their psyops have completely failed. Many Muslims still took the bait and hated China. But it pales in comparison to their hate on the Zionists and their Western backers. They are still enemy #1 for the Muslim world. Next in line could be India, who openly backed Israel, and is openly anti-Muslim. China is not even close to the top of that list for Muslim hate.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I must say as a Shanghainese I've long resented Hong Kong buying the best hairy crabs straight from Yangcheng Lake before Shanghai even get a chance. I suppose though if they are in fact paying many times the price that mainlanders pay then fair enough. But looks like even that is changing now.

Also WTF? They boil hairy crab in Hong Kong instead of steam? What kind of barbarism is this?

The first paragraph says “often steamed”
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Uganda is preparing to borrow $150 million from China's Export Import Bank (Exim) to help expand its internet infrastructure, the finance ministry on Monday.

The move underscores the East African country's increasing reliance for credit on Chinese lenders after the World Bank halted all new lending to Uganda earlier this year in protest at a new anti-homosexuality law.
Ideology and Western values over substance. That is why the West is nowhere close to rivalling China's BRI. Better for more countries of the Global South to look away from Western loans. They come with too many strings attached, and they will work to colonize you eventually.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
There is a small but fundamentally important distinction that needs to be made clear about why China’s rise is unstoppable. It’s not the volume of trade, but a combination of the composition of trade, scale of it, the complexity and comprehensiveness of China’s offerings, and the focused long term strategic planning underpinning it.

Chinese exports are not primary commodities or low tech manufacturing. China has a frankly ridiculous degree of dominance on the practical implementation of ideas into high tech reality and the ability to rapidly produce on an industrial scale.

This is an area that the west has deliberately tried to downplay and suppress, giving disproportionate credit to designs instead.

It is precisely this absolute gulf in practical technical expertise that separates the American and Chinese patent industries. In America, the overwhelming majority of patents remain purely paper exercises and are generally only good for rent seeking when someone else actually manages to make the thing into reality later and completely independently. In China, because of their practical expertise, patents gets turned into reality and are usually massively refined and improved in the process.

China’s exports are also not just finished manufacturing goods, but also infrastructure and factories. This has allowed the global south to have its own affordable and distributed industrial and economic revolutions and their wealth and purchasing power have skyrocketed as a result.

Under the western rules based order, the rules and the west’s stranglehold on technology and finance means the rest of the world will never ever catch up. The whole thing was a giant racket designed to keep the west on top. Under that order, with all the wealth and buying power focused in the west, China was their slave no matter how much it developed, as the West can simply shut them down through financial and technological blockades, exactly like how the Japanese were brought to heel and castrated when their economy grew too well.

That is why China went and created entirely new markets in the global south. Most of the western ruling elite were simply not able to recognise the danger because their own personal stories were all mini-mirrors of the west in general. They were landed gentry whose greatest achievement in life was being born into the right family. They had vast inherited wealth and estates and their entire education and life experience was founded on the focus on maximum rent extraction. And that’s how they run their countries. The idea of growing the economic pie was just entirely beyond their experience and expertise and frankly beneath their notice. They were good at carving out an ever bigger slice of the economic pie for themselves, and the all powerful invisible hand of the free market was supposed to do the rest.

Those of the western elite who did have broader economic competence saw the danger, which was why BRI and made in China 2025 were so demonised and actively sabotaged. But they were too few to be able to muster the kind of focus and resources needed to effectively sabotage the project, and China too strong and focused. So today, Chinese exports to the global south now exceeds that of the west. This is a key watershed moment which is going largely unrecognised and unremarked, but the history books will look back and mark this historic moment as a key turning point in history.

tl;dr video
 

GodRektsNoobs

Junior Member
Registered Member
A portion of the self proclaimed white Argentinians are in fact of mixed race ancestry, though. I know some with clear indigenous features and who claim to be white because of the light color of their skin.

However the majority are white and Argentina is a very racist country and they are proud of it, even the mestizos are racists towards non-white groups. It's disgusting.

I think that perhaps Argentina is a miniature of Europe in the future, with debt, few reserves, non-competitive industry and a highly polarized society between the left and right parties that in each election engage a political and economic revolution that changes everything and guarantees that the country will never have a stable path to recovery.

For now, Europe, like the US, is a false democracy where parties pretend to be opposites but in fact always follow the same hypocritical general policies. But in the future, with increased competition with China and weakening of hegemony, this arrangement will no longer be possible and polarized and combative policies will be the norm unless they take the form of explicit dictatorships again.
Ok, so a nation of Elizabeth Warrens. Got it.

Unfortunately, there are many European Americans and Canadians faking indigenous ancestry. Including some high profile ones in Canada recently. It's a way for settler communities to conjure a "connection to the land" which they often lack.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A New Front Is Opening Up in the US-China Conflict Over Chips​

(Bloomberg) -- President Joe Biden has adopted a two-pronged approach to constrain China’s high-tech progress, curbing Beijing’s access to leading-edge chips while bolstering semiconductor production in the US.

He’s about to ratchet up the pressure further, shifting focus to an emerging arena of the contest for technological supremacy: the process of packaging semiconductors that’s increasingly seen as a path to achieving higher performance.

Only the US isn’t alone is recognizing the potential of so-called advanced packaging: China, too, is capitalizing on an area that isn’t subject to sanctions, capturing global market share and achieving progress denied it in manufacturing high-end chips.

“Packaging is the new pillar of innovation in the semiconductor industry – it will change the industry drastically,” said Jim McGregor, founder of technology analysts Tirias Research. For China, which doesn’t yet have state-of-the-art capabilities, “it’s definitely easier for them to ramp up” here, since it isn’t restricted by the US government. “Packaging could help them bridge the gap,” he said.

Up until very recently, the business of packaging semiconductors – encasing chips in materials that both protect them and connect them to the electronic device they’re part of – was, at best, an afterthought for the industry. So it was outsourced, mainly to Asia, with China a prime beneficiary: today, the US accounts for just 3% of the world’s packaging capacity, according to Intel Corp.

Yet suddenly, advanced packaging is everywhere: Intel is banking on it as a core part of the US chip giant’s strategy to return to competitiveness; China sees it as a means of building out domestic semiconductor capacity; and now Washington is turning to it as part of its own plans for self-sufficiency.

More than a year after the CHIPS and Science Act came into being, the Biden administration has outlined plans for a $3 billion National Advanced Packaging Manufacturing Program, after recently tapping a director for the center. The goal is to create multiple high-volume packaging facilities by the end of the decade, said Under Secretary of Commerce Laurie Locascio — and reduce reliance on Asian supply lines that pose a security risk the US “just can’t accept.”

The president “has made it a priority to ensure America’s leadership in all elements of semiconductor manufacturing, of which advanced packaging is one of the most exciting and critical areas,” White House spokeswoman Robyn Patterson said.

Read more: US Launches $3 Billion Effort to Boost Advanced Chip Packaging

With advanced packaging rapidly becoming a new front in the global conflict over chips, some argue it’s long overdue.

The administration has until now focused on subsidies to bring back chipmaking to the US, but “we can’t ignore packaging because you can’t do one without the other,” said Representative Jay Obernolte, a California Republican who is one of two vice-chairs of the Congressional Artificial Intelligence Caucus. “It wouldn’t matter if we did 100% of our chip manufacturing onshore if the packaging is still offshore,” he added.

Assembly, testing and packaging – usually considered together as “back-end” manufacturing - was always the least glamorous end of the semiconductor industry, with less innovation and lower added value than the “front end” business of making chips with features measured in the billionths of a meter. Yet the level of sophistication is rising fast as new technologies enable chips to be combined, stacked and their performance enhanced in what industry executives are calling an inflection point.

Advanced packaging can’t help China compete with leading-edge semiconductor developments from the U.S., but it allows Beijing to build faster, cheaper systems for computing by stitching different chips closely together. In that case China could save its latest chip technology, which is expensive and likely available in limited volume, for the most important part of the chip and use older, cheaper technologies to make chips that carry out other functions like battery management and sensor controls, combining the whole in a powerful package.

It's a “pivotal solution,” said Bloomberg Intelligence technology analyst Charles Shum. “It doesn’t merely enhance chip-processing speed but crucially enables seamless integration of varied chip types.” As a result, he said, it’s “set to reshape the semiconductor-manufacturing landscape.”

Beijing has long made a strategic priority of semiconductor packaging technologies, including in President Xi Jinping’s Made in China program announced in 2015. China has 38% of the world’s assembly, testing and packaging market, the most of any nation, according to the US-based Semiconductor Industry Association. While it lags behind Taiwan and the US in advanced technology, analysts agree that unlike in wafer processing, it’s in a much better position to be able to catch up.

China already boasts the most back-end facilities by number, including the world’s third-largest assembly and testing company, JCET Group, which trails only Taiwan’s ASE Group and Amkor Technology of the US in revenue. What’s more, Chinese companies are building market share, including through JCET’s acquisition of an advanced facility in Singapore and construction of an advanced packaging plant in its hometown of Jiangyin.

“For China, one way around technology transfer restrictions is advanced packaging, because so far it’s a safe space that everyone invests in,” said Mathieu Duchatel of the Institut Montaigne think tank, a Taiwan-based China expert who studies the geopolitics of technology.

It’s a realization now touching Washington as it seeks to deny Beijing access to the kind of advanced computing technologies that could be put to military use – with questionable success.

When Huawei Technologies Inc. quietly released its Mate 60 Pro smartphone in September, China hawks in Washington raised questions as to why US export controls had failed to prevent a development supposedly beyond Beijing’s capabilities.

In testimony to the House Sept. 19, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo defended the Biden administration’s focus on denying China access to leading-edge chips and the equipment to make them. But she was primed on advanced packaging. The US needs to ramp up its own advanced packaging capacities, she said, since “chips can only get so small, which means all the special sauce is in the packaging.”

One reason for the sudden focus on that special sauce is its necessity to the kind of high-power semiconductors needed for artificial intelligence applications. Indeed, a shortage of a particular type of packaging known as Chip on Wafer on Substrate, or CoWoS, is a key bottleneck in the production of Nvidia Corp’s AI chips.
The president “has made it a priority to ensure America’s leadership in all elements of semiconductor manufacturing, of which advanced packaging is one of the most exciting and critical areas,” White House spokeswoman Robyn Patterson said.
For Jack Hergenrother, vice president of IBM Global Enterprise Systems Development, advanced packaging is relatively “overlooked” in funding terms. He wants double the allocation to help spur a rise in US packaging capacity to 10-15% of the global total, and ideally to take 25% in a decade, to ensure a secure supply chain.

From 3% of the global packaging capacity to 25% within a decade. US trying to compete with China in packaging and probably hoping they could dump their packaging machines in China.
 
Top