Lethe
Captain
Why are you guys so good at cricket? Is cricket really popular in Australia? Australia won 6 out of 13 World Cups and was the runner up in 2 other World Cups. That's straight-up dominance.
I already replied to this earlier, but I recently encountered a pair of articles by Osman Samiuddin, written before and after the final against India respectively, that speak to this:
In the simple, inarguable fact of Australia making the final of this World Cup, this has been a very Australian campaign. They have been here seven times before after all, and are arriving on the back of an eight-game winning streak. For anyone with even passing interest in this sport, this is familiar territory. Australia? Where else would you expect them to be right now?
But it has been a very Australian campaign not in the way of the best-remembered Australian surges. Sure, they have won eight on the trot, but it's not been with the aura of their dominant, flawless campaigns of 2003 or 2007. No, this run has highlighted that other Australianism, that thing that reminds you of German football teams of the past; the thing for which there absolutely must be a long German word that describes the ingrained refusal to lose a game, to never knowingly be beaten until the last wicket has been taken, ingrained so deep that it turns a loss inside out into a win.
They were absolute underdogs, perhaps for the first time in a modern World Cup final, against an [Indian] team that had dominated a tournament in the way Australia have dominated two World Cups this century. That side [India] was playing at home, in front of over 90,000 fans, almost all of whom were their own, in conditions in which they commanded impenetrable mastery. In conditions - a slow pitch, with little bounce, taking turn - which may as well have been designed to douse Australian strengths.
India threw their greatest ODI side ever at Australia in Ahmedabad. Just as Pakistan had thrown their greatest ODI side ever at Australia at Lord's in 1999. Just as Sri Lanka had thrown their greatest ODI side ever at Australia at Bridgetown in 2007. Just as New Zealand had thrown their greatest ODI side ever at Australia in 2015. What have we learnt happens when you throw your greatest ever side at Australia in a World Cup final? And is it ever even close?
Ahead of the final, I had searched for the German word that perfectly describes Australia turning up for World Cup finals time and again. A word that holds true no matter the state of Australian cricket, no matter the style of it, no matter the quality of their players, no matter their form, or the way they made it to the final. With some help I found one which has been applied to Bayern Munich's dominance of the German Bundesliga. Turns out it isn't very long and actually has a direct, one-word English translation. It's unvermeidlich. It means inevitable.
As in, Australia, world champions, inevitably.
If an Australian had written this one would of course feel rather embarrassed. Fortunately Osman Samiuddin is of Pakistani background and grew up in Saudi Arabia, so instead one can just laugh and enjoy the superlative praise.
While we are here, it occurs to me that the idea of Australia being a "sporting nation" is quite an old one. Here is English journalist W.T. Stead (who died in the sinking of the Titanic!) writing on Australian culture in his 1901 book 'The Americanisation of the World: The Trend of the 20th Century' in which he predicted (amongst many other things) that Australia would over time draw increasing inspiration from the United States rather than from England:
In the whole of their history the Australians have never passed through the hard experiences which discipline nations. They have been the spoiled children of the human race. War, pestilence and famine, the three scourges of mankind, have never compelled them to realize the sterner realities of existence [....] They are splendid cricketers, matchless horsemen, and devoted to all manner of sport. Sport, indeed, may be said to be the Australian religion, and with them the chief end of man is for him to have a good time. A self-indulgent and undisciplined race which is suddenly called upon to cope with the delicate and dangerous problems of international policy is certain to be wilful, impulsive, impetuous, not to say reckless in the pursuit of its ideals.
Whatever the original seeds of truth (or lack thereof) behind this narrative of Australia being a particularly sporting nation, I suspect that one significant consequence of our embracing this narrative has been a greater level of institutional support for the development of amateur and professional sport, including cricket. That is to say, to a certain extent it has become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
