Miscellaneous News

P

PeoplesPoster

Junior Member
plawolf said:
While is is true that the requirements are nothing new, what struck me the most was the stark difference in application.

The application of these design requirements went from token box ticking exercises to extremely serious in the last few years especially, and from purely anecdotal observations, it looks to me like the preparations are systematic across the country rather than focused to specific cities like Beijing previously.

A lot of this is hard to measure and observe, as few foreigners will be going to the underground parking garages of random Chinese residential blocks, and since I was travelling with a foreign passport holder, it was actually eye opening to see how few hotels would accept foreign guests and how defensive the staff got at the mere approach of a foreigner (we just wanted to get a coffee from the restaurant of a hotel and were turned away).

It all left a strong mark on me that from the admittedly small sampling I personally witnessed, I was deeply impressed with the application of the design requirements. These newer shelters are built like they are actually meant to be used, and are not limited to just the city centre. If you find such shelters in 3rd line cities and in flats well outside of the city centre, that’s pretty persuasive evidence to me that the application is nation wide.
Click to expand...

Maybe so, I've just taken the whole shelter thing for granted as they've been prevalent in almost all parking garages since I can remember. I would be hesitant to make the claim that this is somehow new or more systematic then it has been before.

As for the hotel thing, that's always been the case. Hotels need certain certifications to host foreign visitors and most don't, either due to hassle or cost.
 
Lethe

Lethe

Captain
azn_cyniq said:
Why are you guys so good at cricket? Is cricket really popular in Australia? Australia won 6 out of 13 World Cups and was the runner up in 2 other World Cups. That's straight-up dominance.
Click to expand...

I already replied to this earlier, but I recently encountered a pair of articles by Osman Samiuddin, written before and after the final against India respectively, that speak to this:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In the simple, inarguable fact of Australia making the final of this World Cup, this has been a very Australian campaign. They have been here seven times before after all, and are arriving on the back of an eight-game winning streak. For anyone with even passing interest in this sport, this is familiar territory. Australia? Where else would you expect them to be right now?

But it has been a very Australian campaign not in the way of the best-remembered Australian surges. Sure, they have won eight on the trot, but it's not been with the aura of their dominant, flawless campaigns of 2003 or 2007. No, this run has highlighted that other Australianism, that thing that reminds you of German football teams of the past; the thing for which there absolutely must be a long German word that describes the ingrained refusal to lose a game, to never knowingly be beaten until the last wicket has been taken, ingrained so deep that it turns a loss inside out into a win.
Click to expand...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

They were absolute underdogs, perhaps for the first time in a modern World Cup final, against an [Indian] team that had dominated a tournament in the way Australia have dominated two World Cups this century. That side [India] was playing at home, in front of over 90,000 fans, almost all of whom were their own, in conditions in which they commanded impenetrable mastery. In conditions - a slow pitch, with little bounce, taking turn - which may as well have been designed to douse Australian strengths.

India threw their greatest ODI side ever at Australia in Ahmedabad. Just as Pakistan had thrown their greatest ODI side ever at Australia at Lord's in 1999. Just as Sri Lanka had thrown their greatest ODI side ever at Australia at Bridgetown in 2007. Just as New Zealand had thrown their greatest ODI side ever at Australia in 2015. What have we learnt happens when you throw your greatest ever side at Australia in a World Cup final? And is it ever even close?

Ahead of the final, I had searched for the German word that perfectly describes Australia turning up for World Cup finals time and again. A word that holds true no matter the state of Australian cricket, no matter the style of it, no matter the quality of their players, no matter their form, or the way they made it to the final. With some help I found one which has been applied to Bayern Munich's dominance of the German Bundesliga. Turns out it isn't very long and actually has a direct, one-word English translation. It's unvermeidlich. It means inevitable.

As in, Australia, world champions, inevitably.
Click to expand...

If an Australian had written this one would of course feel rather embarrassed. Fortunately Osman Samiuddin is of Pakistani background and grew up in Saudi Arabia, so instead one can just laugh and enjoy the superlative praise. :cool:

While we are here, it occurs to me that the idea of Australia being a "sporting nation" is quite an old one. Here is English journalist W.T. Stead (who died in the sinking of the Titanic!) writing on Australian culture in his 1901 book 'The Americanisation of the World: The Trend of the 20th Century' in which he predicted (amongst many other things) that Australia would over time draw increasing inspiration from the United States rather than from England:

In the whole of their history the Australians have never passed through the hard experiences which discipline nations. They have been the spoiled children of the human race. War, pestilence and famine, the three scourges of mankind, have never compelled them to realize the sterner realities of existence [....] They are splendid cricketers, matchless horsemen, and devoted to all manner of sport. Sport, indeed, may be said to be the Australian religion, and with them the chief end of man is for him to have a good time. A self-indulgent and undisciplined race which is suddenly called upon to cope with the delicate and dangerous problems of international policy is certain to be wilful, impulsive, impetuous, not to say reckless in the pursuit of its ideals.
Click to expand...

Whatever the original seeds of truth (or lack thereof) behind this narrative of Australia being a particularly sporting nation, I suspect that one significant consequence of our embracing this narrative has been a greater level of institutional support for the development of amateur and professional sport, including cricket. That is to say, to a certain extent it has become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
 
manqiangrexue

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Maikeru said:
Not a completely stupid idea from BRICS pov. If there was one major western power that could be 'flipped', it would be France. From China's pov France would be a better member than Argentina (or India).
Click to expand...
They're not going to be "flipped"; they're going to be the little SOB spy+monkey-wrench-in-your-fine-machinery type for the West to try its best to slow and sabotage BRICS.
Biscuits said:
Just let them do it. They're less disgraceful than Argentina.
Click to expand...
Letting someone join is easy but kicking someone out is next to impossible, as we see with India. Argentina reflexively quitting without asking its masters whether they wanted it to enter BRICS to basically shit everywhere and roll around like a hog to disrupt every meeting was one lucky godsend in China's way. Adding nations must be done carefully and with long-term strategic vision. The investment in trust must not be taken lightly or on a whim of the current situation. We must remember, it's not that we need to pick one from either France or Argentina; neither is a perfectly good option.
 
Last edited:
O

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Maikeru said:
Not a completely stupid idea from BRICS pov. If there was one major western power that could be 'flipped', it would be France. From China's pov France would be a better member than Argentina (or India).
Click to expand...
Non. You know how France will behave.

It will start its "human rights" and "Ukraine war" bs, and thus start derailing the BRICS discussions.

Plus Global South needs a true Global South forum to communicate with each other without having to suffer through France's delusions.

Finally, the optics would be much bad with admitting France, a colonial country, to BRICS. The African continent wouldn't be pleased with watching BRICS cheering up their new colonial state buddy.
 
V

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Maikeru said:
Not a completely stupid idea from BRICS pov. If there was one major western power that could be 'flipped', it would be France. From China's pov France would be a better member than Argentina (or India).
Click to expand...
I agree. I think of BRICS as a commodity backed financial system that is an alternative to $ hegemony. France (very different from every other European countries) has a solid history of resisting US hegemony. Plus, I personally think it's a good thing to hear different voices and make it somewhat representative of all major continents.
 
Q

quim

Junior Member
Registered Member
ansy1968 said:
The curse of being a catholic country, what the Spaniards leave us is an oligarchic society where they select who to run and to support. Of course they want to convert their currency to dollar so that they can launder their money and leave the shithole they created.
Click to expand...
Argentina is a liberal country governed by liberal or right-wing political lackeys of the US since its independence from the Spanish Empire in the 19th century, supported by the US Monroe Doctrine to dominate the Americas and suppress any European or Asian influence in the region.

Why are you blaming the Catholics or the Spaniards? The world is no longer in the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church has been nothing for a long time, it no longer has any power or influence anywhere, not even in its European birthplace like Italy and France.

So you are just reproducing Anglo-Saxon propaganda of blaming past enemies for everything negative and not blaming present Anglo-Saxon interference and liberal order for maintaining the current problems.
 
TK3600

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Overbom said:
Non. You know how France will behave.

It will start its "human rights" and "Ukraine war" bs, and thus start derailing the BRICS discussions.

Plus Global South needs a true Global South forum to communicate with each other without having to suffer through France's delusions.

Finally, the optics would be much bad with admitting France, a colonial country, to BRICS. The African continent wouldn't be pleased with watching BRICS cheering up their new colonial state buddy.
Click to expand...
Just give France observer status and no permanent status. Something like France even pretending to flip is embarassing enough. Kicking them out again is double the fun.
 
S

Stierlitz

Junior Member
Registered Member
Overbom said:
Non. You know how France will behave.

It will start its "human rights" and "Ukraine war" bs, and thus start derailing the BRICS discussions.

Plus Global South needs a true Global South forum to communicate with each other without having to suffer through France's delusions.

Finally, the optics would be much bad with admitting France, a colonial country, to BRICS. The African continent wouldn't be pleased with watching BRICS cheering up their new colonial state buddy.
Click to expand...
Agree with everything you've written. France is an American trojan horse. Accepting them into BRICS would be an epic own goal.
 
FriedButter

FriedButter

Major
Registered Member
The French plays the role of the “good cop” in the bad cop relation. They act as the public PR punching bag for the west like they did when Macron used his acting skills to play the “mediator role” during talks with the Russians. It would have stayed on if public pressure wasn’t so severe to the point where they had to drop their mask. Behind the public screen they will continue pushing the US agenda.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top