Miscellaneous News

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
Too bad about him, he used to be a decent analyst (I enjoyed his podcast episode with Steve Hsu). It's obvious the Israel/Palestine thing has caused him to lose his marbles.
Now that I thought some more about it, it's likelier that's he's turned to grifting. There's no money to be had from the right wing in America if you have anything realistic to say about China. He wants to gain traction for his anti-woke bit so he's fluffing Trump, pushing a pro-America narrative, etc.

It's the Jackson Hinkle thing - did you know Hinkle used to be a Bernie bro?
 

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
What do people Think about William Lai? Is he considered a big threat for China?

Im asking because I am very confused him. I don't think he will be as bad as Tsai was. Because I don't think he is an extreme pro-western pro-US candidate as Tsai. I think he wants to be independent of US influence and US do not trust him that much. That's why he brought up Hsiao Bi Khim as the VP candidate in order to placate the US.

On the other hand, Ko wen-je and Hou yu ih are also not much of a big boon for China. Ko is extremely irratic and he might be pro-China oneday and anti-China the next day.

If KMT or TPP wins, China might be forced to give Taiwan concessions like more access to internal organization like WHO without much concession coming from Taiwan.

It might be better to have Lai in power and having Lai fighting the Pro-US faction and Taiwanese public slowly becoming truly anti-DPP and a better KMT candidate winning the next time. China in the mean time can continue its diplomatic and military pressure going.
I would say it doesn't make a difference, because either US will be goaded into attacking soon, or US will be forced to give up their claims.

Both are filthy quislings and need to be exterminated. With increased threat from the area in the last 10-15 years, it is all but guaranteed that the government will soon make a move. As in Xinjiang, the helpfulness of the locals will dictate the terms of military crackdown.

China is in no lack of resources. US was sceptical of its ability to take territory from China in the past, it is only desparation that drives them to attempt doing so now.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Good riddance. Another CIA success, but I see it more as a favour to China.

Failed economies/countries have no place in BRICS. Imagine your one of your first added country being Argentina lol

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Argentina is no longer joining Brics, says top aide to Javier Milei, right-wing presidential winner​

  • We do not understand the interest’ in the bloc of leading emerging markets including China, despite membership being poised to start from January
  • But new government unlikely to disrupt ties between Buenos Aires and Beijing given major financial deals already agreed upon, analysts say
Diana Mondino, Milei’s principal adviser on foreign affairs, said Argentina would not proceed with plans to join the association of leading emerging markets comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.
“We do not understand the interest” in the bloc, Mondino told Russian news agency Sputnik News. “We do not understand … what Argentina gets out of it at this moment. If later it turns out that there is an advantage, of course, we will analyse it.”
 

MortyandRick

Senior Member
Registered Member
Even though it sounds funny, but this China is behind everything is also exploited by Burmese nationalists to advance their minority ethnic cleansing agenda. Apparently sinophobia is rampant in Myanmar too.
Why is sino phobia so rampant and in a place like Myanmar? I thought china would have more influence in that country. How does china reverse this tend of countries using china as a scapegoat. I dont think that's a good way forward for china. Something needs to be done to try and reverse it, even though I have no idea what would process would be.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
Why is sino phobia so rampant and in a place like Myanmar? I thought china would have more influence in that country. How does china reverse this tend of countries using china as a scapegoat. I dont think that's a good way forward for china. Something needs to be done to try and reverse it, even though I have no idea what would process would be.
Myanmar isn't just sinophobic, the majority Burmese is xenophobic against every other minority. They legit separate their population into different classes by their ethnicity, card carrying and everything:

0077FKGyly1hjyau2b28lj30st0ih423.jpg
0077FKGyly1hjyb08rq2kj30ie0ddmyo.jpg
0077FKGyly1hjyb0886sbj30ja0byabe.jpg

Only Burmese and extremely small number of ethnic minorities who've proven their loyalty to Burmese get the pink full citizen card. Why do you think both ASSK and Junta supported Rohingya genocide, why are EAOs so dead set on maintaining their independence?
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Why is sino phobia so rampant and in a place like Myanmar? I thought china would have more influence in that country. How does china reverse this tend of countries using china as a scapegoat. I dont think that's a good way forward for china. Something needs to be done to try and reverse it, even though I have no idea what would process would be.
Only difference between Chinese today and Jews in 1936 is Chinese have a powerful homeland. Both 'omnipotent' and also 'easily defeated'.

I dont know about Myanmar, but there are two approach in general. For hierchical society you just need to assert your might by defeat local hegemon, or you give them a moderate spanking Vietnam style. They worship might so hurting them actually makes them respect you more.

Second, toward animous country due to culture difference needs patience, people will understand each other as they interact in mutually beneficial ways, starting small.
 
Top