This is the combined effect of mobilized both not being able to work and also not being able to buy anything with the wages they would otherwise get from working. It's not to do with soft power or attracting foreign talent.5% of labor force is slashing GDP by 11%.
It's based because k-pop is a misogynistic industry that exploits women's bodies for marketing while working them to the bone, and at the same time inflicting insecurity and body dismorphia in young women. It's not based because it's "degenerate" or whatever other goofball ass shit this guy picked up from putinist accounts.My counter-conservative instincts scream me to condemn this. But I can't because it is based for some reason I don't grasp.
View attachment 120970
Israel goods trade deficit country. so buying less should not impact GDP that much. it is not full time remote warfare in trench that it impacts buying stuff anyway. but this exactly lack of Israel soft power that it cannot generate force structure from global diaspora who are fit and trained.This is the combined effect of mobilized both not being able to work and also not being able to buy anything with the wages they would otherwise get from working. It's not to do with soft power or attracting foreign talent.
No. Economic retaliation is well within China's sovereign rights and does not consitute bullying. If you piss me off, I will not do business with you. It's simple and well-principled. If you think that's bullying then refusing to go back to a restaurant because you have personal issues with the owner must be bullying too.The first answer should be yes, if you have a principled stance. Economic retaliation to a sovereign right to deploy non-lethal military assets is bullying and tyrannical.
Just because China reacted "proportionately" does not exempt them from bullying. Just because China didn't "kill" South Korea does not exempt them from bullying.
The key is, you aren't really consistent with your principled stance on what bullying is. It can be bullying without an invasion.
My bottom line actually makes sense in any society while your bottom line is tyranny on a grand scale and barbarianism/hooliganism/uncivilized behavior on a personal scale. It's illegal in any society to act the way you wish and that includes in China. Physical violence used against someone who is acting within his rights, regardless of your benefit or liking, is against the law in every country. Once again, if you flip what you said and it now sounds unacceptable to you, then your original sentence was as well.I did, and I don't accept that as sufficient to constitute tyranny.
Sure. The bottom line is this.
Your position: China is within its rights to use any means up to military force to compel surrounding countries to sever military ties to the US.
My position: China is within its rights to use any means up to and including military force to compel surrounding countries to sever military ties to the US.
If your way works and they break their military alliance with the US, I'm perfectly fine with that. If not, you get off the bus and I take it one stop further.
WASHINGTON — U.S. and European officials have begun quietly talking to the Ukrainian government about what possible peace negotiations with Russia might entail to , according to one current senior U.S. official and one former senior U.S. official familiar with the discussions.
The conversations have included very broad outlines of what Ukraine might need to give up to reach a deal, the officials said. Some of the talks, which officials described as delicate, took place last month during a meeting of representatives from more than 50 nations supporting Ukraine, including NATO members, known as the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, the officials said.
No, that's oversimplification. First of, grouping 'Israel' with political zionism is akin to grouping hamas with Palestinians.
Hamas is as much an ideology as it is a militia, politico group. Zionism is relatively similar.
Perhaps you are right that Hamas, having it's root derived from the hyper conservative Muslim Brotherhood materialized and evolved from the decades of persecution and occupation however in it's current form it is NOT an entity that desires a 2 state solution. That is very clear from them.
They want to drive all Jews into the Red Sea just as hardliners in Likud want to drive all Palestinians from Gaza.
There are sizeable portion of Palestinians as there are sizeable portion of Jews who desire a 2 state solution and wants to live in peace HOWEVER those folks you cannot find in either the CURRENT version of Hamas or Likud.
The Chinese method only works because Han Chinese are the majority population in China by a large margin. If, instead, Han were a minority, and Uyghurs were the majority, the policy simply would not work. Historically, rule by an ethnic minority can only be sustained via 1) adaptation to the majority's culture & identity 2) persistent repression or 3) a combination of both. The Manchu rule of China is a great example of minority rule in a historical context, where they blended with the majority population, adopting aspects of Chinese language, culture, government forms, etc., and managed to successfully suppress Han restoration sentiments for hundreds of years. Yet, they were still overthrown in the end.
If Israelis wanted to create a one-state solution, they'd need to 1) present themselves as patrons of Islam and 2) live with the fact that Muslims may end up eventually taking over, any way. Current Israeli leaders cannot accept either of these conditions, and so they refuse to become a "ruling minority," choosing instead to do whatever it takes to remain the demographic majority while still securing the borders of the state. That inevitably results in zero sum conflict with the Palestinians.
China is using economics as leverage to override SK's sovereign decision making. That's called economic coercion. SK has hesitated to deploy additional US THAADs btw, it has succumbed to the pressure. It worked very well.No. Economic retaliation is well within China's sovereign rights and does not consitute bullying. If you piss me off, I will not do business with you. It's simple and well-principled. If you think that's bullying then refusing to go back to a restaurant because you have personal issues with the owner must be bullying too.
U.S., European officials broach topic of peace negotiations with Ukraine, sources say
The conversations have included very broad outlines of what Ukraine might need to give up to reach a deal with Russia.
Biden is probably going to ask Xi to pass a message to Putin during APEC.