Miscellaneous News

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
China's SCS policies need a revision. They are inconsistent and arguably too timid. I was against violence but Filipino govt ships entering the lagoon would put China's credibility in question. I am 100% in support of the policy to sink the said ships. I think forcefully defending physically held features is a reasonable redline.

 

Africablack

Junior Member
Registered Member
China's SCS policies need a revision. They are inconsistent and arguably too timid. I was against violence but Filipino govt ships entering the lagoon would put China's credibility in question. I am 100% in support of the policy to sink the said ships. I think forcefully defending physically held features is a reasonable redline.

You mean fall into the obvious ploy so the US and the west can say "Ah ha! I told you China was aggressive!!"

When they start firing then you fire back. Until then you just watch them make a complete fool of themselves.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
I 100% agree and have even written about the possibility here. Lots of people said it's "low probability" yet here we are now.

I never made a comment on this, but I think I will now.

I do not agree with this "low probability," because it is "zero probability."

Posturing, is just like posturing.

What do Korea and Japan have to gain in a war with China. Will the Americans abandon them when the going gets tough just like the South Vietnamese.

This is not a serious question in my view.

This expression from people who date, like boy and girl going out on a date, kind of sums it up.

Flirting, is not a commitment.

Every girl knows that.

Guys being guys, well, you know how we are.

:oops::D
 

BoraTas

Captain
Registered Member
You mean fall into the obvious ploy so the US and the west can say "Ah ha! I told you China was aggressive!!"

When they start firing then you fire back. Until then you just watch them make a complete fool of themselves.
Being aggressive > being a passive shopping mall. The former one has influence. The latter one can't even sell weapons because it is useless to politically align with it.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
China's SCS policies need a revision. They are inconsistent and arguably too timid. I was against violence but Filipino govt ships entering the lagoon would put China's credibility in question. I am 100% in support of the policy to sink the said ships. I think forcefully defending physically held features is a reasonable redline.

Sir a map of Scarborough shoal, there is only one entrance inside the shoal, the Chinese CCG always maintain a ship inside and one at the mouth of the lagoon. so there is no way for the Philippine CG to enter unless they blew up those ship and provoke a war. These noises are being raise to gather public support as constant use of China threat had lessen their value, it was always a recurring theme and we are sick of it.

And if you see the map, the entrance was dredge so that a ship can be moored inside, Its a rich fishing ground and Chinese CG are there to protect it from overfishing...lol

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

KYli

Brigadier
America spends trillions on global misinformation, information, and brainwashing. What China spends is peanut.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

France wants money from Nvidia.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

A pure projection from the US POV. Being a superpower and the world police is very costly.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

More like the Western propaganda is working on overtime to demonize China. And the oppositions would blame China for many things until they came to power and beg China to invest more.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Being aggressive > being a passive shopping mall. The former one has influence. The latter one can't even sell weapons because it is useless to politically align with it.
Try reading this "study" recently published and linked here by our forum member @Taiban which can be read here:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The level of gaslighting and projection American intellectual class level against China is just beyond comical; it's quite tragic.
Screenshot_20230928_160729_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230928_160952_Drive.jpgScreenshot_20230928_161016_Drive.jpg

Then read this recent OP-ED published in SCMP by Professor Majoney.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It's clear that America is hellbent on trying to create provocative conditions as that's the current American strategy is to paint themselves and their allies as the "GOOD GUYS" and China as the "BAD GUY" because that's how quixotic and messianic those people/cultural affinity are. And if China were to take the bait of whipping the bejeesus out of the non-existent PH navy, then America would have managed to accomplishing their tasks in painting China as the cancer that must be stopped, if not destroyed.
 
Top