Dude must show his sincerity by dedicate 1/3 of his workday to studying Xi Jinping thoughts like Black Rock management.
If the shirt isn't made out of Xinjiang cotton, it doesn't count.
Dude must show his sincerity by dedicate 1/3 of his workday to studying Xi Jinping thoughts like Black Rock management.
You mean fall into the obvious ploy so the US and the west can say "Ah ha! I told you China was aggressive!!"China's SCS policies need a revision. They are inconsistent and arguably too timid. I was against violence but Filipino govt ships entering the lagoon would put China's credibility in question. I am 100% in support of the policy to sink the said ships. I think forcefully defending physically held features is a reasonable redline.
I 100% agree and have even written about the possibility here. Lots of people said it's "low probability" yet here we are now.
Being aggressive > being a passive shopping mall. The former one has influence. The latter one can't even sell weapons because it is useless to politically align with it.You mean fall into the obvious ploy so the US and the west can say "Ah ha! I told you China was aggressive!!"
When they start firing then you fire back. Until then you just watch them make a complete fool of themselves.
Sir a map of Scarborough shoal, there is only one entrance inside the shoal, the Chinese CCG always maintain a ship inside and one at the mouth of the lagoon. so there is no way for the Philippine CG to enter unless they blew up those ship and provoke a war. These noises are being raise to gather public support as constant use of China threat had lessen their value, it was always a recurring theme and we are sick of it.China's SCS policies need a revision. They are inconsistent and arguably too timid. I was against violence but Filipino govt ships entering the lagoon would put China's credibility in question. I am 100% in support of the policy to sink the said ships. I think forcefully defending physically held features is a reasonable redline.
Try reading this "study" recently published and linked here by our forum member @Taiban which can be read here:Being aggressive > being a passive shopping mall. The former one has influence. The latter one can't even sell weapons because it is useless to politically align with it.