Miscellaneous News

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
you are confusing West with Europe. India is part of ruling coalition of world and Modi got highest awards from Arabs. It is irrelevant what he does inside India. same with rise of Mexico and hispanic influence in North America. it will be next to impossible to act against them.
opinion of wealthy Miami people are well known even regarding France.
You resembles Ah Q
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Ah Q is a begger in the village, he claimed to be the relative of Master Zhao who is the most powerful and richest person in the village. One day Ah Q went to the bar and bragged to everyone that Master Zhao talked to him. Everyone was surprised and curious of what they talked. Ah Q said that Master Zhao told him to "fuck off".

A slave in a household isn't really a member of the house.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Animals, too, have a right to peaceful protest.

Upon news that animals have been freed from their concentration camps and are out for vengeance, we need an 'animals' faction too.

Dunno man. Lions and tigers have a tendency to protest food shortage by mauling live humans.
I have passed that limit today after 1 hour.

You are Donald Trump’s alt?
 

phrozenflame

Junior Member
Registered Member
I have two opinions that I wrote multiple times on a few forums.

1- When the time comes, the US will have zero problems with turning Western opinion about India negative. I think India will fare even worse than China.

2- Progress requires close supervision of all religions in a country. Otherwise human sacrifice, people cursing each other using hexes, and exorcists earning enough money to buy BMWs are what you get. Most developing countries have even university professors visiting fortune tellers to learn about the future. No progress can be expected with such a culture. The CPC was absolutely spot on at not-allowing unregistered religious societies to exist.
They've tolerated India sitting on the bench for Russian-Ukraine conflict, but you can bet there will be serious repercussions if India does not become the meat shield against China for which it is being armed and propped up.
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

PORT MORESBY – As an officer of the Department of Foreign Affairs in the Papua New Guinea government, I have to write anonymously to secure my safety.

I am writing to reveal interference by the United States in PNG’s internal affairs which is undermining the bilateral relationship between Australia and PNG.

As China's influence rises in the Pacific Islands, PNG’s prime minister James Marape is worried that the China-Solomon Islands Security Agreement will lead to the Solomon Islands surpassing PNG's dominant position in Melanesia. So the Marape government decided to negotiate separately with the US and Australia on two separate agreements they wished to conclude.

The US rapidly resolved negotiations and the PNG-US Defence Cooperation Agreement was officially signed before Australia had even concluded its draft Bilateral Security Treaty. Marape has defended the US-PNG agreement several times in parliament, while raising some constitutional concerns on an Australia-PNG treaty during his meeting with Australia’s deputy prime minister Richard Marles.
PNG has chosen the US to be the first defence partner, though Australia is PNG’s closest neighbour and long-time partner.

To its advantage, the US had acquired an advance draft of the Bilateral Security Treaty and knew Australia intended to be PNG's first security partner. The US discovered that PNG would not cooperate with other countries in the Pacific Islands security area without Australia's approval.

So the US then made adjustments to the Defence Cooperation Agreement, revising or deleting articles that concerned PNG in order to settle the agreement ahead of its treaty with Australia. It was planned that the negotiation between Australia and PNG would be finished in April, but the US intervened and asked PNG to pause the talks with Australia and work on its own Defence Cooperation Agreement first.

The US made commitments during the negotiation with PNG to step up its security support and assistance and cover shortfalls in assistance that Australia had not fulfilled. Marape and his cabinet had arrived at the belief that Australia was not fully committed to assisting PNG develop its defence force.

There was apparently an internal report revealing that Australia’s intent was not to enhance and elevate some areas of security cooperation but to ensure PNG continued to rely on Australia for all its security needs. In its negotiation, considering that Australia was trying to prevent US dominance in the Pacific Islands region, the US asked PNG not to share the Defence Cooperation Agreement with Australia.

As a result, Australia's negotiation process with PNG was paused. The PNG government, frustrated by empty promises, considered the PNG Defence Force would never be developed in cooperation with Australia, so decided instead to work with a more powerful partner.
PNG knows that its own geopolitical position is becoming of increasing importance, but believes Australia has never respected its position. So PNG decided to use this opportunity to reduce its dependence on Australia.

It also seems the US has supported the Marape government in stifling opposition in PNG to assure the Defence Cooperation Agreement can be implemented smoothly. For example, Morobe Governor Luther Wenge was initially opposed to the agreement but joined Marape's Pangu Party and supported it after Marape gave K50 million to his electorate development fund.

Wenge later publicly criticised Australia saying it did not want PNG to develop its own defence force. Australia is PNG's long-term partner and closest neighbour and we have a long mutual history in economic, political and security cooperation. My colleagues and I believe that Marape should not betray Australia because it has been tempted by the US, which seems to have intervened to dilute or even ruin our bilateral relationship.

Even though Marape explained to Australia that the Defence Cooperation Agreement would not affect the bilateral relationship, there is no doubt that the relationship with the US will have priority. So Marape has tightened his control over the mainstream media, social media posts have been deleted for no reason and voices opposing the Defence Cooperation Agreement cannot be heard.
We hope some influential media and Australian friends will help us to protect PNG's national interest and our bilateral relationship with Australia.

Source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
This is, quite frankly, caveman IQ reasoning. The Americans are about as interested in developing PNG’s military as the Australians are, and the desire to keep PNG dependant on Anglo power is mutual between these two Five Eyes members. Absolute toddler level thinking.
Incidentally, PNG was also one of the last places on earth to practice cannibalism, so similar behaviour from the child sacrificing Indians is t9 be expecte.

Eighty Afghan civilians may have been summarily killed by SAS, inquiry told​

Lawyers for bereaved families allege British soldiers carried out policy of terminating all fighting-age men. One of the elite soldiers is believed to have “personally killed” 35 Afghans on a single six-month tour of duty as part of an alleged policy to terminate “all fighting-age males” in homes raided, “regardless of the threat they posed”.

Non paywall source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
sounds like the anglos are trying to get ahead of any Afghan Taliban UN led Nuremberg war inquiry into the war crimes of NATO forces. Maybe sacrifice a few troopers so the ruling elite can continue surviving.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
Turns out "liberal democracies" were police states all along.


Poland acting all uppity nowadays because they think they're Uncle Sam's favorite now?



If this fits the legal definition of genocide,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
are obligated to act.

There should be a political denunciation by the Global South, with the possibility of multilateral sanctions. The UK is a relatively weak country- it should make the perfect example to countries like Ukraine and Israel.
Importantly, the Convention establishes on State Parties the obligation to take measures to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide, including by enacting relevant legislation and punishing perpetrators, “whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals” (Article IV). That obligation, in addition to the prohibition not to commit genocide, have been considered as norms of international customary law and therefore, binding on all States, whether or not they have ratified the Genocide Convention.

States' obligations under the Genocide Convention​

  • Obligation not to commit genocide (Article I
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    )
  • Obligation to prevent genocide (Article I) which,
    Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    , has an extraterritorial scope;
  • Obligation to punish genocide (Article I);
  • Obligation to enact the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the Convention (Article V);
  • Obligation to ensure that effective penalties are provided for persons found guilty of criminal conduct according to the Convention (Article V);
  • Obligation to try persons charged with genocide in a competent tribunal of the State in the territory of which the act was committed, or by an international penal tribunal with accepted jurisdiction (Article VI);
  • Obligation to grant extradition when genocide charges are involved, in accordance with laws and treaties in force (Article VII), particularly related to protection granted by international human rights law prohibiting refoulment where there is a real risk of flagrant human rights violations in the receiving State.


The International Criminal Court also ratified this treaty, so it has the duty to prosecute members of the UK government. Ironic considering it was the UK that led the calls to arrest Putin for war crimes at the ICC.
1688352323152.png
 

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member

The amazing thing about China’s rise is that it is as inevitable as the laws of physics. A nation of 1.4bln with a penchant for rationalism and scientific development consensus is inevitably going to have to be listened to by the world regardless of whether or not they are led by pristine white anglo supremacists or otherwise.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

exactly what can Yellen offer, that the war hawks in Washington won’t immediately destroy?

also, around the same time, it would not be lost upon the anglos that the BRICS bank just got larger (and Indias voting power just got diluted)
 

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member

The amazing thing about China’s rise is that it is as inevitable as the laws of physics. A nation of 1.4bln with a penchant for rationalism and scientific development consensus is inevitably going to have to be listened to by the world regardless of whether or not they are led by pristine white anglo supremacists or otherwise.
Honestly I think this is not a win. Given China has the talent to produce top quality papers, why should Chinese researchers publish them in an English journal? Chinese should be confident and have a flagship research journal in Chinese only.

Chinese researchers citing each other's English journal papers even though everyone is Chinese is pretty cringe.
 
Top