Miscellaneous News

Chevalier

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
China can now legally fight back against western bullies.
This opens the pathway for all those uighur and Xinjiang cotton producers to sue western propagandists for defamation and renders the western politicians and their children as liabilities when they become "Pompeo'd". Good luck cashing in on your corruption when you're out of office.

1688103819267.png
More acutely, the liberal Democratic Party who run MSNBC and who rely on the black population as a vote bank and who selectively raise comprador blacks and Asians to serve the white anglo ruling class of the Democrats- are absolutely crushed at having to answer honestly why they reject Asian applicants.

But we're ignoring the reason why this is such a big issue and that reason is because major financial/global companies based in America only hire Harvard/Ivy League alumni. The quickest way for a young student to make 150K - 180k per annum is with a degree from Harvard into finance, law, accounting, medicine etc. For Asian parents who sacrificed years of their lives and for Asian kids who sacrificed their youth to study- being denied access to that surefire route to success is an injustice which america is currently paying for with its decline.

Instead, that pathway to success via Harvard is a chute now, for the Failsons and Faildaughters of anglo american elites and their children's children due to the alumni legacy effect.
Personal anecdote, i once dated a WASP girl, your typical heavily medicated northeastern WASP girl who only did an arts degree at Harvard but was part of a sorority; last i heard of her she's now a Vice President at BlackRock and judging by her Linkedin, hasn't taken on any other additional study or Masters degrees or qualifications. Blackrock effectively trained her for the job at their own expense. That's the sort of affirmative action not being talked about here- instead the ruling anglo elites are using the Asian community as their scapegoat so as to escape black and latino rage.

The only way for America to beat China is to become Chinese- which is a tall order for an organisation like the Five Eyes which has categorically stated in no uncertain terms, that it is for the rule and preservation of the white anglo race.
 

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
There is no need for NK to have nukes. China will defend it with conventional weapons and troops. China will never tolerate attacks on NK by anyone (other than herself).

Having nukes around you that are not under your control is never a good idea. What if a Kim goes nuts and decided to nuke Beijing one day? That's why China joined the sanctions to force the Kims to give up the nukes since she has little leverage over the Kims.
You keep bringing this up, but in what scenario would the Kims even contemplate such a thing?

The number one priority of the Kim regime is to stay in power. This is why they have been so adamant on developing their own nukes. Nukes are the best way to ensure your regime won't be toppled by external powers.

Nukes are an extra insurance policy - on top of the existing Sino-North Korean defence treaty - against American-backed regime change. China has tried to influence NK politics, but has shown zero desire to topple the Kims. Chinese intervention in the Korean war is the reason why the Kims are in power, and the North Korean economy would quickly collapse without aid and trade from Beijing.

Nuke China = take out an entire city and couple million civilians before the entirety of the NK peninsula gets plastered back to the stone age. Again, if the goal is to prevent regime change, why do such a thing? As much of a shitshow North Korea is, I do still believe the Kims are rational actors with regard to safeguarding their interests.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
I suspect as much but China isn't the only one has hidden currency reserve.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Quoting from the article:
“China’s lack of transparency here is a bit of a problem for the world,” Setser wrote. “China structurally is so central to the global economy that anything it does, seen or unseen, will eventually have an enormous impact on the rest of the world.”
You mean that "bit of a problem" is actually a major problem for the petrodollar hegemony.

LMAO. Fvcking cope.

China also guards the actual amount of her gold reserves very well (likely 15-20 times higher than the officially published data):
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Then, there's the (extra) gold scattered among the Chinese populace. Knowing that the Chinese people absolutely adores gold - Who knows how many tones of (extra) gold is currently out there across China...

1a6.png
 
Last edited:

pmc

Major
Registered Member
What are the odds the protests are being instigated by the US as punishment for Macron trying to pull away from the US influence? Macron going to China, wanting to go to the BRICs conference, French companies using Yuan to buy things?

Its disproportionate retribution but that's exactly the western mindset: put one toe out of line and its execution for you!
France has high youth unemployment rate for very long time. so highly likely even if they get jobs in later years they may not have higher standard of living due to lack of wealth. and than state separating religion from governance and trying to integrate these other people.
France lack medium business of Germany and large business may not create so many jobs.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
France has for years struggled with high rates of unemployment among young people, although it had been
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
between 2016 and 2020. It dropped from 24.9 percent to 20.3 percent for men and from 23.9 percent to 19.9 percent for women between 15 and 24 during that four-year period.

But it slightly increased with the pandemic. According to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,19.5 percent of young people under 25 were unemployed in March 2021 vs. 19.3 percent in February 2020.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
China needing to defend NK with conventional military means the potential to open a second front when Taiwan is already flashpoint. It gives the US one more vector to challenge China's red line.

The argument that the NK leadership could one day "go nuts" and nuke Beijing is pretty much entirely from Western propaganda.
Relationships between countries are all based on interests. How were the relationship between Vietnam and China in the 60’s? Blood brothers? How low did the relationship go after the end of the war? Do you think it is in China’s interest for Vietnam to have nukes?
NK were never that friendly toward China anyways. If the US collapses tomorrow, what will the North Korea‘ attitude be toward China given their history? Any competent Chinese leader should not take the chance of a nuclear-armed neighbour turning against China.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
You keep bringing this up, but in what scenario would the Kims even contemplate such a thing?

The number one priority of the Kim regime is to stay in power. This is why they have been so adamant on developing their own nukes. Nukes are the best way to ensure your regime won't be toppled by external powers.

Nukes are an extra insurance policy - on top of the existing Sino-North Korean defence treaty - against American-backed regime change. China has tried to influence NK politics, but has shown zero desire to topple the Kims. Chinese intervention in the Korean war is the reason why the Kims are in power, and the North Korean economy would quickly collapse without aid and trade from Beijing.

Nuke China = take out an entire city and couple million civilians before the entirety of the NK peninsula gets plastered back to the stone age. Again, if the goal is to prevent regime change, why do such a thing? As much of a shitshow North Korea is, I do still believe the Kims are rational actors with regard to safeguarding their interests.
If NK doesn’t have nukes, China can send in troops to quash any regime-change attempts. However, since NK has nukes and if the rebels managed to get their hands on nukes and threaten to use them on China if she send in troops, China most likely can only watch while NK gets regime changed. Is that a good outcome for China?

Please look up the histories of Sino-NK relationships. Kims were never friendly toward China. The threat of NK using nukes on Beijing severely limits what China can do if NK goes rogue.
Do you think letting Vietnam to have nukes a good idea? China and Vietnam used to be “blood brothers” too.
 

RedMetalSeadramon

Junior Member
Registered Member
It is obvious that Hispanic workers are probably more productive. Otherwise, no employers would be willing to pay extra for immigrant workers.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Labor Department announced its findings six months after two agriculture businesses in the Delta
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
filed on behalf of local Black farmworkers over claims that farms hired white laborers from South Africa and paid them more than the local Black employees for the same type of work.
 

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please look up the histories of Sino-NK relationships. Kims were never friendly toward China. The threat of NK using nukes on Beijing severely limits what China can do if NK goes rogue.
Do you think letting Vietnam to have nukes a good idea? China and Vietnam used to be “blood brothers” too.
The possibility of North Korea going 'rogue' as you put it is unlikely precisely because the Kims are in power.

This is because the Kims really only have one red line: regime change. As long as China doesn't try to enact regime change, Kims will not nuke Beijing no matter how low the Sino-NK relationship gets.

Nuking Beijing means no more North Korea, no more Kims. They obviously know this and do not want this. If you choose to believe Kims are rational actors who act in their own interests, Kims are very predictable.
 
Top