Miscellaneous News

BlackWindMnt

Captain
Registered Member

New Czech President, well known US puppet is supposedly "sharing a stage" with Taiwan FM

However, they could argue its not exactly a violation of One China principle since Joseph Wu was only attending as a guest of the NGO summit

What do you guys think? Should China retaliate?
Let them talk China has already won the biggest price Europe could ever give China.
Economic access to Russian commodities giving China's future industrial manufacturing lead a guaranteed future.
 

Taar

New Member
Registered Member
It is funny that MSM just reported 13,000 Chinese millionaires would relocate from China and made it like the apocalypse. However, much poorer India, it is expected 6000 Indian millionaires would flee the country. However, the article explained it as just wealthy people trying to diversify their assets and change domicile to dodge taxes.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Don't need to worry too much about this, millionaires are anyone with a fully paid house in tier 1, and some of the new tier 1 and tier 2 cities. According to Hurun, China has 5.18M families worth over 600M RMB by 1/1/2022, roughly a millionaire in USD, an increase of 100K families over a year ago. So 13000 leaving really isn't much.
 

Hood_Rat

New Member
Registered Member
Don't need to worry too much about this, millionaires are anyone with a fully paid house in tier 1, and some of the new tier 1 and tier 2 cities. According to Hurun, China has 5.18M families worth over 600M RMB by 1/1/2022, roughly a millionaire in USD, an increase of 100K families over a year ago. So 13000 leaving really isn't much.
The figures I saw indicated investable assets which excludes primary residence net value.
 

emblem21

Major
Registered Member

New Czech President, well known US puppet is supposedly "sharing a stage" with Taiwan FM

However, they could argue its not exactly a violation of One China principle since Joseph Wu was only attending as a guest of the NGO summit

What do you guys think? Should China retaliate?
Europe is headed for collapse due to rising inflation and basically everything going to shit with all the protests and energy issues coming up fast. Best for China to take its time to pick and choose its next course of action without rushing as that is what the USA absolutely wants right now. Considering the current situation and how much of a consumer Europe is right now, China had been be ready to write off the EU as a lost cause and be prepared to bomb the hell out of the EU should they send any of their ships and crap to the South China Sea and possibly nudge Russia to make life hell in the EU as well and when worse comes to worse and the EU tries to send a nuke into Russia, simply let Russia reduce the entire European continent to ash and write off their relations with Europe as a chance to save on valuable resources and also help Russia to bring down the USA once the U.S. loses it key Allie’s from their own stupidity. NATO is worthless without the USA and it doesn’t have the ability to fight China in its back yard without a hypersonic weapon being lobbed into their capitals and let’s not forget that Russia has a score to settle with the EU for its betrayal of the Minsk agreements along with everything else. That is why the US and EU cannot fight China at all because if they try to sail all the way to the South China Sea to fight China, don’t expect Russia to sit there and let them have an easy time to play around again, not to mention all the other countries that are just chomping at the teeth to get some long awaited pay back once the full force of the west tries to direct itself against China, which is going to need many years to build up, which they simply do not have the time to do with all its problems right now
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member

New Czech President, well known US puppet is supposedly "sharing a stage" with Taiwan FM

However, they could argue its not exactly a violation of One China principle since Joseph Wu was only attending as a guest of the NGO summit

What do you guys think? Should China retaliate?

Reaction:
These chihuahuas of the Central and Eastern Europe really are begging for a slipper's sole being swing right against their faces, aren't they?

Response:
Let's talk about China's strategic aerial force projection.

The combat radius of the H-6K bombers is around 3500 kilometers. Coupled with KD-2000 LACM's strike range of approximately 2000 kilometers (of which every H-6K can carry 6 of them) - That means the effective strike range of the H-6K bombers is around 5500 kilometers.

Here's what 5500 kilometers of strike range from a PLAAF airbase in Urumqi looks like - without aerial refueling:
h6kurumqi.png
Then, there's the PLAAF airbases in Kashgar and around western Xinjiang, which are actually closer to Europe than Urumqi is.

Plus, we haven't even talked about air-launched variants of DF-21 and DF-17.

So, take your pick wisely, chihuahuas.
 
Last edited:

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
An institution of trustworthiness and integrity.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Cedric Lodge, 55, among five suspects indicted for allegedly stealing and selling body parts donated to Harvard Medical School.



US science alienating itself from the international community.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
stirs outcry​

Foreign groups must send their NIH partners copies of their lab notebooks and other raw data at least every few months. "It’s crazy."
The US mandate will damage long-standing relationships across the globe. The policy “further reinforces the mounting perception that the USA regards foreign scientists as problems and not as key collaborators in improving global health."




Tsai accidentally dials the right number.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
At some point it NATO wants to actually have real control over Chinese areas, they have to attack with armed force. Words and photo ops won't help against Chinese fortifications and weapons.

If that happens, China has more than enough stored up to stop a NATO offensive in its tracks. But China won't pick a direct fight with NATO, not as long as it can fight at a safe distance using proxy conflicts such as the Ukraine war.

The bottom line for NATO is that they need to break through, land AND be able to supply a signficant invasion force inside Taiwan. And this force would have to be sustained long enough for China to believe NATO control over Taiwan is a fait accompli, which might mean years or decades. Whereas China just needs to shoot everything that is forced to rush into the area, and they have tools which are the best at that particular type of action.

I do think eventually that because there is a threat of not just US but all of NATO invading China, China should station large amounts of troops in western Russia, so that the demilitarization of NATO home country electric grids can immediately start the very moment a NATO country joins the war. But quite frankly, most of the NATO cannot make their way all the way to Asia.

You are being way too passive and maybe 15 years behind China’s current hard power and deep infrastructure investments.

If NATO directly involves itself in combat with Chinese forces, that’s game on and basically WWIII. In which case China will not settle for merely destroying the NATO expeditionary invasion forces, it will take the fight directly to NATO’s home, and the Russians would be ecstatic at that development.

All the investments made to install the direct rail link from China to Europe can transport more than just consumer goods.

Should the need and will to do so exist, a vast PLA ground army can be at the EU’s literal gates far faster than most people would believe, never mind expect. This is a feature, and is a core reason why China doesn’t really need or want that many overseas military bases. Why bother with the expense of that when you can just build the infrastructure to allow you to rapidly deploy as much men and materials as you could ever need for any war rapidly instead? That infrastructure also generates massive economic returns and brings wealth, development and local grassroots support in peacetime instead of being a massive economic burden and source of friction and resentment with locals that military bases tend to become. It’s the same reason China doesn’t bother permanently stationing vast armies in Xinjiang or Tibet, and just rapidly surge forces there when needed.
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
’ Chinese trans woman who accused flight attendant of improper pronoun use gets online criticism, social media ban​




Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

  • Move follows similar dropping of anti-government tune on other music-streaming platforms

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The billionaire co-chairman and CEO of Chinese developer Guangzhou R&F Properties Co Ltd on Wednesday agreed to be extradited from London to the United States, where he is facing bribery charges.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member

In case he limits his tweet view:
aiibpoorsod.jpg

This poor little maple sod be like:
- Join AIIB, which is founded by and headquarters in communist China, to "sErVe cAnAdA's iNtErEsTs"
- Suddenly realise that AIIB is in communist China and staffed by communist Chinese with communist Chinese work culture
- Pikachu shocked face
- Rage quit and whine like a baby on Twitter

Everyone, come over here and take a look at this poor little maple sod:
20230615_170440.jpg

Hey little Bobby, here, have some tissue paper:
cndtissue.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top