At some point it NATO wants to actually have real control over Chinese areas, they have to attack with armed force. Words and photo ops won't help against Chinese fortifications and weapons.
If that happens, China has more than enough stored up to stop a NATO offensive in its tracks. But China won't pick a direct fight with NATO, not as long as it can fight at a safe distance using proxy conflicts such as the Ukraine war.
The bottom line for NATO is that they need to break through, land AND be able to supply a signficant invasion force inside Taiwan. And this force would have to be sustained long enough for China to believe NATO control over Taiwan is a fait accompli, which might mean years or decades. Whereas China just needs to shoot everything that is forced to rush into the area, and they have tools which are the best at that particular type of action.
I do think eventually that because there is a threat of not just US but all of NATO invading China, China should station large amounts of troops in western Russia, so that the demilitarization of NATO home country electric grids can immediately start the very moment a NATO country joins the war. But quite frankly, most of the NATO cannot make their way all the way to Asia.