Miscellaneous News

supercat

Major
Posted in Covid thread but reposting here since the other one is mostly dead..

The US will try to increase the "wuhan lab leak" blame game soon. However, the author is also arguing that the US goverment/Fauci was outsourcing the GOF work to China for US DARPA .

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

With the timing of Blinken's visit, possibly another "leak" trying to prevent US/China engagement though
The Fox News report is based on the substack article, and the the substack article is based on unnamed sources and quotes Alina Chan, who is pretty much a COVID conspirator and wrote a whole book without much real evidence. The classified information will probably be released in a week. Let' wait and see. My hunch is that if there had been anything substantial, they would have already been used by the US government to accuse China long time ago.

EU will have a hard time to get rid of China's telecommunication technologies completely.
As for Europe, it is unrealistic for the continent to promote 5G development while excluding Huawei. Huawei's 5G technology, which is mainly based on microwave technology - using base stations instead of optical fibers - is irreplaceable currently. As other alternative solutions like Open RAN are still not feasible, if the EU urges its member states to take restrictive measures against Huawei's 5G equipment, or even impose the ban on Huawei, Europe is actually cutting off its own opportunity in 5G development.

Even if the EU plans to promote Open RAN technology, the O-RAN Alliance also has many Chinese companies, such as China Mobile, China Telecom, and China Unicom, participating in it. In the end, it is impossible for EU to bypass Chinese technology to develop the next generation of communication networks. For instance, The EU is funding Huawei to run cutting-edge research on next-generation communication systems, even though several European governments have banned the Chinese tech group from their telecoms networks, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Ya Ya is having a very good life at home!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
China basically funded AIIB. Canada has knowingly joined the bank but now claiming it is a problem. Trudeau is getting ridiculous.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Western countries that joined were only in it for contracts to build infrastructure. Those were guaranteed contracts meaning if a country defaults on paying back the loan, those contracts to build infrastructure would still be paid by the infrastructure bank no matter what. That's why countries like Canada joined AIIB in the first place. They certainly weren't coughing up all the money to be loaned.

This is blowback of China wanting Western countries to join in the first place. China wanted countries in the West to join just to make it look legitimate. And because of that a pointless country like Canada can make it look like they were an important part of AIIB to then backout like it was a huge loss.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
So 6 months in one house and another 6 months in other house. If parents live in different school districts, then the kid needs to go to 2 different schools every year.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

It doesn’t seem all that bad. Tho maybe I just don’t know but the law changes from basically… Why you should have joint custody to why you shouldn’t have joint custody. Which would apply to the point KYli made

Under current law, judges decide custody cases by weighing the best interests of the child, and the idea that each parent should have “significant,” though not necessarily equal, time with the child. That contact should be “frequent, continued and meaningful.”

The legislation changes that by requiring judges start each child custody case with the presumption that “equal or approximately equal” parenting time for each parent is in the child’s best interests. A parent can rebut that presumption by presenting evidence that a 50/50 arrangement isn’t in the child’s best interests, and the judge would then consider that evidence.
 

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
That makes a lot of sense because China's status as a real peer competitor is still very young. Like Kishore Mahbubani like to say one moment China was like a kitten and that one short moment you looked the other way China changed into a big Tiger. Nation state dont know how to handle this new situation.
Many old people (most politicians) rarely change their opinions. We'll have to wait for the next generation to take over for other countries to have an accurate view of modern China
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Really interesting development.

Five Chinese / HK-based firms removed from EU sanctions list following consultations with Chinese diplomats in Brussels

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I wouldn't be surprised if these firms were removed from the sanctions list because they are providing goods to Ukraine.

What a joke this Ukrainian "name and shame" list is. Almost guaranteed product of the Let's-be-the-US'-dog faction in the government.

Great Wall Motors is listed on it? The Ukrainian military uses the Great Wall Wingle Pickup truck! Haval is very popular in Ukraine.
Adding Hikvision and Dahua? What other country is trying to take these two companies down?

Look at this pathetic USA CSIS opinion piece upset that ZTE and Huawei continue to operate in Ukraine despite the war going on.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
It isn't a coincident that Princess Sirindhorn and the Thail Army chief visted China very recently. This represents the royal house and the military, now we see the probe.
Good to see if real. China, for long, constrained its foreign policy by limiting itself to contacts with national governments. I have an unpopular opinion that it would be quite based if China was actually doing some of the things Western media is accusing it of.
 

56860

Senior Member
Registered Member
Good to see if real. China, for long, constrained its foreign policy by limiting itself to contacts with national governments. I have an unpopular opinion that it would be quite based if China was actually doing some of the things Western media is accusing it of.
Agreed. It would be exceptionally based if, for example, the CPC made it a national priority for fentanyl to be as easily accessible as water for every American.
 
Top