They want to provoke China without actually going to war because the costs and consequences of actually starting to shoot is quite unknown and could be extremely devastasting to them. So there's actually 2 parts of the question: you can refuse to do what they want by either deescalation/restraint or by escalating even further and making it clear that they cannot control the pace of the conflict.US wants to provoke China (thought that is pretty much the entire theme on SDF). So China matching move for move wouldn't be very smart, no? And thus acted with restraint for almost 5 years.
But frankly, any US strategist trying to spin the above reasons as justification for war with China should be fired.
- The majority of the world, especially muslim countries, don't think there's genocide.
- Troops are already deployed in PH, Australia, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. No war cause China hasn't attacked anyone. It has strong trade and investments in all of those countries and vice versa. Operation Desert Shield happened after Saddam formally annexed Kuwait.
- Not sure what you mean by Illicit shipments. If you mean fentanyl, know that most of the smuggling now happens via Mexico, not China.
US can't just start a shooting war with China, lol.
And it really doesn't matter what the rest of the world thinks, as Rwanda also had a casus belli that they ignored, nobody actually cared about Yugoslavia and the facts are always malleable - see Gulf of Tonkin Incident.