Sir look at him, he start crying, huhuhu...lol
Miscellaneous News
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
Huffpost on why people should NOT be put in jail for anti-Asian hate crimes:
Erdogan brings the remaining swing votes onto his side. Disappointed the third party candidate didn't win (he seemed the most based) but just glad it's not the US nominee.
The ban easily overshadows whatever pretenses were made at G7 about solidarity in countering China's "economic coercion", especially with South Korea eager to eat up Micron's shares. In a single action, invalidates their whole charade and sets an example for the rest of the US lackeys on what might happen if they think they can f_ck around with impunity.
This is exactly why you put bullies in their place, else they start thinking they can do anything they want without consequences. The biggest motivation for these types of people is fear.
Let’s Start With Treatment, Not Jail.
Erdogan brings the remaining swing votes onto his side. Disappointed the third party candidate didn't win (he seemed the most based) but just glad it's not the US nominee.
Turkey’s Erdogan
I think that somehow the State Department must've convinced themselves that the reason China hadn't retaliated yet was because they couldn't. They have read too many of their own "China is impotent" MSM articles LOL. China was just waiting for the right timing to spring the news.
The ban easily overshadows whatever pretenses were made at G7 about solidarity in countering China's "economic coercion", especially with South Korea eager to eat up Micron's shares. In a single action, invalidates their whole charade and sets an example for the rest of the US lackeys on what might happen if they think they can f_ck around with impunity.
This is exactly why you put bullies in their place, else they start thinking they can do anything they want without consequences. The biggest motivation for these types of people is fear.
A good dentist won't help... the US has played most of its cards while China is just getting started.
Biting back at China over Micron will break US’ teeth: Global Times editorial
By Global Times Published: May 23, 2023 12:07 AM
US-based semiconductor firm Micron Photo: VCG
The news that Micron's products sold in China did not pass the network security review has caused a strong reaction in the US. This indirectly shows China's decision has touched some Americans, demonstrating its power and producing additional effects. However, the true nature of the matter cannot be covered up by the US.
A US Commerce Department spokesperson said in a statement that this was a "raid and attack" on US companies, restrictions that "have no basis in fact" that would lead to "distortions of the memory chip market." This is Washington's consistent use of strong words to justify its actions. In fact, these words are just the phrases used to describe US actions of undermining free trade in recent years. But China is not the US, and will not learn bad behaviors from Washington.
The conclusion was made after a seven-week investigation by China's General Administration of Customs and a network security review conducted by China's Cybersecurity Review Office (CRO) in accordance with the law, which can withstand scrutiny. The review found that Micron's products have serious network security risks, which pose significant security risks to China's critical information infrastructure supply chain and affect China's national security. According to laws and regulations such as the country's Cybersecurity Law, operators of critical information infrastructure in China should stop purchasing Micron's products.
Besides assessing how much losses China's decision will bring to Micron, the US also shows a certain degree of unease and insecurity, feeling that the "blast radius of this matter may be much larger." This is mainly because they have done many unscrupulous things to China and are very clear about what it means for the US to attack Chinese companies under the guise of "national security." Therefore, they reflexively imagine that any action taken by China toward US companies is "retaliation."
Of course, it is not a bad thing to make those who harm China's interests feel uneasy, and it is a punishment they deserve. The Micron case is indeed the first time that CRO has conducted a review of a foreign company, but Micron is not the first company to undergo a security review by the office. The so-called "targeting foreign companies" is simply not true. The only thing it shows is that with the gradual improvement of China's regulatory system, all market entities must comply with Chinese laws in their business activities. This is not about targeting specific companies. There will be no discrimination based on the different "identities" of the enterprise, neither will anyone be targeted nor given special treatment.
As one of the world's largest manufacturers of semiconductor storage and imaging products, Micron's products in China have long been said to have cybersecurity risks. In addition, Micron has always been known in the industry for its "aggressive competitive tactics" and has been accused of playing an instigating role in the US' crackdown on Chinese technology, as well as being the US company that has dealt the most blows at Chinese chip enterprises. Micron itself knows clearly whether it has cooperated with Washington to export unsafe products to China, and this will undoubtedly determine its future in the Chinese market.
Many foreign media outlets have included this matter in the scope of the US-China tech war, suggesting that it could lead to an escalation of the "tech war." On the surface, it may seem that way: in the past, the US always took the initiative to strike in the semiconductor field, while China was constrained and subject to others' control; now, China has taken actions against Micron, demonstrating its ability to fight back. However, it needs to be said that the reality is not so. The so-called "national security" of the US is a unilateral and anti-market suppression of China's technology, while China's security review of Micron is to effectively safeguard its own security interests. The nature of the two is completely different. Washington's accusations against China can only expose its hypocrisy and double standards.
In fact, it has long been clear to the world who is engaging in unreasonable suppression and distorting the market. When China just started reviewing Micron, the White House demanded that the South Korean government prohibit South Korean chip manufacturers from filling the gap left by Micron in the Chinese market. That's how domineering it is. Over the years, facing Washington's "small yard, high fence" strategy and its push for "decoupling," China has consistently adhered to a high level of openness and supported an open and inclusive global economic order. This has to a considerable extent offset the negative impact caused by Washington and greatly stabilized the global industrial and supply chains.
Take a look at US' vicious and ruthless suppression against Huawei, and its greedy and lawless attempt to forcibly acquire TikTok. It has reached an extreme in trampling on the rules of free trade and the principles of fair competition. However, a legitimate and necessary action taken by China is used by the US to turn around and bite back, which is indicative of their guilty conscience and unreasonableness. They must be kicked in the teeth and be made to weigh the consequences carefully.
Ukraine can’t win the war against Russia, Prime Minister Viktor Orban said.
With NATO not ready to send troops, “there is no chance for poor Ukrainians to win this war,” Orban said in an interview with Bloomberg Editor in Chief John Micklethwait on Tuesday.
With NATO not ready to send troops, “there is no chance for poor Ukrainians to win this war,” Orban said in an interview with Bloomberg Editor in Chief John Micklethwait on Tuesday.
Isn't ming also multi ethnic?
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
A=Mexican labor rates
B=US labor rates
Fraction = A/B, which is <1. Technically, it can also be >1 mathematically, but when used in English, it indicates <1.
And this is current as well.
"Currently, for a semi-skilled operator, Mexico labor costs equal $5.30 USD (fully burdened including state and federal taxes, plus competitive market benefits) per hour for a 48-hour work week compared to $23 USD per hour for a 40-hour work week in the U.S. "
Wayyy lower than what an American worker earns, hence, the fraction comment.
This is the "power" of your bullshit. I've gotten a raise every year where I work without asking. Do I have excellent demographics or soft power?
LOLOLOL "Hispanic dominated world" LOLOLOL Don't think I've heard another person imagine such a thing in my life
Are you familiar with the recent deals between them and China? Or do you consider China a high birth level country?
And what levels are those? Who defined, or rather, made that up? You?
Ren Jialun 任嘉伦 and his mega-based shirt
If the US interpreted that this ban shows China's limited option, then it would be in for a surprise as there are long list of the US companies can be sanctioned and banned. If it were self-consolation, then can use to it as China would hit back more strongly as time passes.
