Miscellaneous News

coolgod

Brigadier
Registered Member
#1 gives the US powers to attempt to exclude China from a number of major international financial institutions. Including the G20 and possibly SWIFT.
G20 is really G2 (US and China) + 0, literally the last G20 was a 拜习会, if Xi didn't show up the meeting would be pointless. G20 was also started cause US needed China's help during the 2008 financial crisis. Kicking China out of G20 wouldn't achieve anything.
#2 gives the US powers to impose targeted financial sanctions on individual Chinese figures.
That's even better, roots out corruption in China, stops Chinese ppl from investing in the west and promotes huge capital outflow from the US.
#3 is there to provoke China into some sort of action against Taiwan to justify #1 and #2.
I don't really think China cares that much about Taiwan in the IMF (a US puppet bank), not even close to the most provocative thing US has done.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
The numbers for Cambodia and Laos seem dubious. When the survey was last conducted 81.5% and 81.8% of respondents from those countries chose China, now only 26.9% and 41.1% choose it. What exactly happened in the last 12 months for results to change so drastically ?
It's simple. In their survey sample pool. They put in much more pro-US activists, and only a handful of actual locals. Then label this whole group as 'Cambodians' or 'Laotians'.
 

jwnz

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's simple. In their survey sample pool. They put in much more pro-US activists, and only a handful of actual locals. Then label this whole group as 'Cambodians' or 'Laotians'.
Nah, you gave them too much credit. I reckon they simply employed the wet finger method to come up with the numbers, to meet the predetermined objective of making US look better.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Are these senators concerned that Shein might use cotton from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
?

View attachment 106913
that looks nothing like slavery... (some would say)

Django%20Unchained_GeneAutryRock_01.jpg


real slaves had no shoes.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Is it better for China to not get into an arms race? Absolutely. But the arms race of the previous Cold War was more about power and dominance by both superpowers. For China, this current arms race is about survival, not domination. There can be no greater justification for an arms race than that.
Bro to add on your point an arm race will benefit China because:

1) they don't have to replace and maintain a lot of legacy weapon

2) it can stimulate it's economy

3) with Escalatory Dominance means a lot of leverage and hard power which will translate to soft power, as Teddy Roosevelt use to say "Speak softly BUT carry a BIG Stick"

4) which will stretch the already overextend US military assets which in turn may forced it's vassal to hedge, questioning the reliability of American commitment and promises as what we had seen from Vietnam up to present (Afghanistan and Ukraine)

5) it will bankrupt the US as they reach Imperial Over reach. They can't fight a two front war much less a near peer opponent.

6) with limited resources spend to boost infrastructure , education and scientific innovation, it may affect the social fiber and quality of life of most American as it misappropriate its spending instead of investing for the future.
 

bajingan

Senior Member
I just think that the US is acting in dangerous, half-insane desperation at this point in time. The US, under the senile Joe Biden administration had delivered on almost all of its major threats so far. They had threatened to: impose the ultimate sanctions on Russia, blow up the Nord-Stream pipelines, send heavy military equipment to Ukraine, send Pelosi to Taiwan, and shoot-down a Chinese balloon.

Biden at this point had not yet threatened to go directly to war with Russia. But Biden had threatened to defend Taiwan against China. What exactly does he mean by that, we don't know for sure. But the Chinese top brass should not take any chances. Exercise, and be ready for war with the US. We don't know how stupid the the US can get, especially the Republican stupids, who have successfully pushed Biden into doing reckless anti-China stuff. The moment China see some new developments in US military deployments around it's neighborhood, it should start to go into a semi-wartime economy, like Russia in recent times. Time to stockpile on materiel, manpower, ammunition, and emergency stuff. China can mobilize for war much faster than any 'democratic nation'. But it's better to be safe than sorry. The US can no longer be trusted to be rational these days.

Remember that there were multiple papers in the US, dating back to 2016, setting the date for war with China by 2025. 2025 is that magic year for war that the US is telling everyone. Remember a recent memo written by USAF general, Mike Minihan, calling for war with China by 2025, and saying that the US should 'aim for the head'. Was that a call for nuclear first strike? We don't know for sure. What we do know is that the US is not making the same type of threats against Russia. I think because Russia has a declared nuclear arsenal powerful enough for the US to rule out any nuclear first strike. What China needs to do very soon, is to deal with this perception by the US that it can win a nuclear war with China. There are big progress on the hardware front, but China needs an official declaration to the US. Tell them that China's nuclear arsenal has been updated, and it's not trivial. No need to give numbers, but tell them that it is big enough to end the whole of the USA. And if the US tries any decapitation strike, China can still respond with a devastating second strike. China does not have a history of bluffing, so the US will have to take this threat seriously.

Is it better for China to not get into an arms race? Absolutely. But the arms race of the previous Cold War was more about power and dominance by both superpowers. For China, this current arms race is about survival, not domination. There can be no greater justification for an arms race than that.
I agree with everything you wrote, except for nuke first strike, the u.s has no ability to first strike to eliminate all of China nuclear forces both in the past or present, simply due to the fact that China has ICBMs hidden in the 5000km long underground great wall, this will guarantee PLA second strike ability, i don't think the u.s can survive losing 10 major population centers, therefore MAD already guaranteed decades ago, let alone now

Does the americans know 100% sure how many ICBMs are in those tunnels? Highly unlikely
 
Top