Miscellaneous News

daifo

Captain
Registered Member
There is no common currency to have in BRICS. Do you even understand that a common currency with those countries would severely damage and cripple China's wealth and economy?

Look at BRICS:
  • Brazil: Failed economy
  • Russia: lol
  • India: enemy
  • China: The only strong one
  • South Africa: Irrelevant
If not for the hegemonic clash, it would make more sense for China to have a common currency with the US than with BRICS

Once again I request to unban Gatekeeper so that he can dispell these idiotic ideas that Lavrov is pushing as a smokescreen

The mods already mention they are willing to unban Gatekeeper if he is willing to say he agree to abide by the rules and not go too crazy, but no one actually knows where else he hangs out to communicate that fact or maybe he lurks but his pride stops him
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
There is no common currency to have in BRICS. Do you even understand that a common currency with those countries would severely damage and cripple China's wealth and economy?

Look at BRICS:
  • Brazil: Failed economy
  • Russia: lol
  • India: enemy
  • China: The only strong one
  • South Africa: Irrelevant
If not for the hegemonic clash, it would make more sense for China to have a common currency with the US than with BRICS

Once again I request to unban Gatekeeper so that he can dispell these idiotic ideas that Lavrov is pushing as a smokescreen
China can never, ever have a common currency with US. It makes more sense for Japan to adopt RMB.

US runs a highly inflationary and debt fueled economy without even the pretense of balancing the budget at this point. Chinese monetary policy is only mildly inflationary, as shown by actual on the ground results. Japan is having problems with deflation. Japan could solve it's deflation problem by adopting RMB while US money printing would cripple China.

think that would ever happen?
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
When did Saudi Arabia replace South Africa in BRICS? Must have missed that memo.

Even if we leave out the questionable logic of using non-BRICS member states as counter examples to the US trying to make moves against BRICS countries for looking to launch a common currency that is blatantly intended as an alternative to the petrodollar, it’s easy to see why the US has not tried to attack Saudi Arabia, because the US lacks the means to easily make financial attacks against Saudi Arabia, and because of the direct and immediate consequences of any such attack.

Indian stupidity and corruption makes it exposed financially by the Adani group at a national level. The US doesn’t need to launch direct attacks to take them down several pegs, and stock market attacks have enough plausible deniability that makes it hard for India to retaliate even if it had the means to do so, which they don’t. What counter moves could India make that would even have any impact on the US?

No such low hanging fruit to pick on Saudi Arabia. To have a similar impact on the Saudi economy would require direct government level action from the US. That would then trigger Saudi retaliation and not even the US political leadership are moronic enough to go picking fights with Saudi Arabia at the same time it’s fighting a proxy war against Russia while its SOR is at near historic lows.
Is it though? The report has thousands of citations. These type of stuff are not done overnight. It must have be under work for a year or more. It might not be CIA but I feel there must be some sort of coordination between the report and the BBC article.
 

baykalov

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Interview with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban:

The big questions were about the Russia-Ukraine war. Orban is a goat among the NATO sheep. He has from virtually the beginning pushed hard for a cease fire and a peaceful settlement - not out of any particular love for the Russians, but out of concern for the fate of Hungary, and Europe. He has been falsely smeared as a Putin shill, but he genuinely doesn't seem to give a rat's ass.

Orban said that the West needs to understand that Putin cannot afford to lose, and will not lose, because he's up for re-election next year, and he cannot run as the president who lost a war. What's more, he said, Russia cannot allow NATO to establish a presence in Ukraine. The time has long passed when Russia might have been able to conquer Ukraine, or install a friendly regime. Had Russia won a quick victory, that might have been possible, but it's hopeless now. Therefore, said Orban, Russia's goal is to make Ukraine an ungovernable wreck, so the West cannot claim it as a prize. At this, they have already succeeded. "It's Afghanistan now," he said. "The land of nobody." (Meaning: No Man's Land.)

The West doesn't understand that time is on Russia's side in Ukraine. Russia is a huge country, and can mobilize a vast army. Ukraine is already running out of troops. When that happens, then what?

"We are in big, big trouble," Orban said, of the West. If Russia's coming spring offensive proves successful, then the NATO countries are going to be faced with the question of do we send in soldiers to fight for Ukraine? This is not something Orban thinks the American people are considering, but it is front to mind among a growing number of Europeans, whose countries stand to be devastated if war spreads.

Really? NATO troops fighting Russians in Ukraine?

Yes, said Orban. It sounds crazy today, "but if you look at the tendency of how we got to this point today, it can't be ruled out."

The West is "in a war with Russia. That's the reality," he said. "Every day we are moving further in."

To add clarity that was plain from the context of his discussion, Viktor Orban doesn't want the West to be in a war with Russia. He is pushing for peace, and has been from the beginning, saying nobody wins from this war. But he says that far too many Westerners are deluding themselves about what's really happening -- and what could happen. The West might think it's not in war with Russia, but by sending more and more weapons, and getting closer to actual troop intervention, Western leaders are playing an extremely dangerous game with themselves, with Russia, and with Western publics. A journalist asked the prime minister if he thought the war could go nuclear. "I can't exclude that they would use it," he said, of the atomic bomb. He clarified that he was talking about tactical battlefield nukes, not mushroom clouds over Warsaw and Berlin -- "but I can't exclude that either." If Ukraine somehow, using Western weapons, gets to the point of crossing the border into Russian territory, then the future of the world will be so bright the West will have to wear shades.

Someone pointed out that the Russians have had a sorry battlefield performance to this point. Yes, said Orban, it's true. But if you look at Russian history, this is how it goes with the Russians at war. They start out poorly, but after a while, they figure things out, and then become hard to stop. He expects that will be the case this time. He also mentioned at the start of the session that Russia's being pushed into an alliance with Iran is extremely dangerous for Israel, and expressed hope that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, whose adult son was sitting at the table, could become a peacemaker between Russia and Ukraine. Though Ukraine has had some amazing successes against Russia, Orban said in the long term, he can't see that we in the West are on the winning side, especially considering Russia's manufacturing capacity.

Orban talked about being the lone dissenter among the 27 European Union leaders on Ukraine war policy. He said it's very frustrating, because his colleagues in leadership won't debate the wisdom of this war. Why not?

"They don't know who they are," he said bluntly.

He explained that if you asked them to define themselves in relation to the war, they would say, I am the leader of a country standing on the right side of history. That conviction, and being pressed hard by Washington, as well as "fear of the liberal media," is what motivates their thinking - not a consideration of what's in the best interest of their own countries. Orban said he sees his role as the elected leader of Hungary to help his people deal with the challenges they face today, and to prepare them for tomorrow's challenges. "But I would be the only one to understand [the job] that way," he said.

Orban made a pointed, and poignant, remark about the Germans in the current war: "The Germans are suffering because they know what's in their national interest, but they're not able to say it." He meant that the German leadership knows it has no business being involved in a war with Russia, but is, for whatever reasons, unable to say no to Washington.

Someone raised the possibility of a coup d'état in Russia that removed Putin. Orban reacted strongly, saying that there is nobody in line to succeed Putin who would be anything but more hawkish. That would solve nothing.
 

FriedButter

Colonel
Registered Member
BRICs isn’t making a common currency like the EU. It’s more like a commodity. They can use that currency to trade with each other or exchange it with the local currency of a BRICs currency member. For example, like gold, silver etc. Use it for trade or exchange it.


China can never, ever have a common currency with US. It makes more sense for Japan to adopt RMB.

US runs a highly inflationary and debt fueled economy without even the pretense of balancing the budget at this point. Chinese monetary policy is only mildly inflationary, as shown by actual on the ground results. Japan is having problems with deflation. Japan could solve it's deflation problem by adopting RMB while US money printing would cripple China.

Main problem isn’t even the economy. It’s who controls the printing press. Zero chance there will be any agreement on such a thing about even splitting that power. Not to mention the political issue if one side enters a severe recession while the other doesn’t.
 

quim

Junior Member
Registered Member
There is no common currency to have in BRICS. Do you even understand that a common currency with those countries would severely damage and cripple China's wealth and economy?

Look at BRICS:
  • Brazil: Failed economy
  • Russia: lol
  • India: enemy
  • China: The only strong one
  • South Africa: Irrelevant
If not for the hegemonic clash, it would make more sense for China to have a common currency with the US than with BRICS

Once again I request to unban Gatekeeper so that he can dispell these idiotic ideas that Lavrov is pushing as a smokescreen
The BRICS nations have always been despised by the USA and often sabotaged to even serve as suppliers of immigrants.

If China wants to lead the world one day, it has to be able to offer a safe haven for failed countries to free themselves from the poverty that the Western order keeps them in.

Offering trade, infrastructure and a business environment with the fulfillment of contracts would make China a global leader as well as make China an engine of wealth generation to take poor countries out of the periphery and put an end to the waste of so many talents and resources still untapped in the world. Investment that will bring return.

Otherwise, the USA will always continue to lead the world, giving crumbs to its faithful vassals in Europe and Japan and keeping Africa and Latin America in poverty only to send them immigrants.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I can please ask people do at least some basic research to at a minimum understand what is being discussed before jumping in and going off on random tangents attacking a figment of your own misunderstandings.

Case in point, look up what the proposed (which isn’t actually a new proposal) reserve currency is and does. Hint, it’s not about everyone adopting a single common currency like the Eurozone, as that would indeed be silly.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

memfisa

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Interview with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban:

The big questions were about the Russia-Ukraine war. Orban is a goat among the NATO sheep. He has from virtually the beginning pushed hard for a cease fire and a peaceful settlement - not out of any particular love for the Russians, but out of concern for the fate of Hungary, and Europe. He has been falsely smeared as a Putin shill, but he genuinely doesn't seem to give a rat's ass.

Orban said that the West needs to understand that Putin cannot afford to lose, and will not lose, because he's up for re-election next year, and he cannot run as the president who lost a war. What's more, he said, Russia cannot allow NATO to establish a presence in Ukraine. The time has long passed when Russia might have been able to conquer Ukraine, or install a friendly regime. Had Russia won a quick victory, that might have been possible, but it's hopeless now. Therefore, said Orban, Russia's goal is to make Ukraine an ungovernable wreck, so the West cannot claim it as a prize. At this, they have already succeeded. "It's Afghanistan now," he said. "The land of nobody." (Meaning: No Man's Land.)

The West doesn't understand that time is on Russia's side in Ukraine. Russia is a huge country, and can mobilize a vast army. Ukraine is already running out of troops. When that happens, then what?

"We are in big, big trouble," Orban said, of the West. If Russia's coming spring offensive proves successful, then the NATO countries are going to be faced with the question of do we send in soldiers to fight for Ukraine? This is not something Orban thinks the American people are considering, but it is front to mind among a growing number of Europeans, whose countries stand to be devastated if war spreads.

Really? NATO troops fighting Russians in Ukraine?

Yes, said Orban. It sounds crazy today, "but if you look at the tendency of how we got to this point today, it can't be ruled out."

The West is "in a war with Russia. That's the reality," he said. "Every day we are moving further in."

To add clarity that was plain from the context of his discussion, Viktor Orban doesn't want the West to be in a war with Russia. He is pushing for peace, and has been from the beginning, saying nobody wins from this war. But he says that far too many Westerners are deluding themselves about what's really happening -- and what could happen. The West might think it's not in war with Russia, but by sending more and more weapons, and getting closer to actual troop intervention, Western leaders are playing an extremely dangerous game with themselves, with Russia, and with Western publics. A journalist asked the prime minister if he thought the war could go nuclear. "I can't exclude that they would use it," he said, of the atomic bomb. He clarified that he was talking about tactical battlefield nukes, not mushroom clouds over Warsaw and Berlin -- "but I can't exclude that either." If Ukraine somehow, using Western weapons, gets to the point of crossing the border into Russian territory, then the future of the world will be so bright the West will have to wear shades.

Someone pointed out that the Russians have had a sorry battlefield performance to this point. Yes, said Orban, it's true. But if you look at Russian history, this is how it goes with the Russians at war. They start out poorly, but after a while, they figure things out, and then become hard to stop. He expects that will be the case this time. He also mentioned at the start of the session that Russia's being pushed into an alliance with Iran is extremely dangerous for Israel, and expressed hope that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, whose adult son was sitting at the table, could become a peacemaker between Russia and Ukraine. Though Ukraine has had some amazing successes against Russia, Orban said in the long term, he can't see that we in the West are on the winning side, especially considering Russia's manufacturing capacity.

Orban talked about being the lone dissenter among the 27 European Union leaders on Ukraine war policy. He said it's very frustrating, because his colleagues in leadership won't debate the wisdom of this war. Why not?

"They don't know who they are," he said bluntly.

He explained that if you asked them to define themselves in relation to the war, they would say, I am the leader of a country standing on the right side of history. That conviction, and being pressed hard by Washington, as well as "fear of the liberal media," is what motivates their thinking - not a consideration of what's in the best interest of their own countries. Orban said he sees his role as the elected leader of Hungary to help his people deal with the challenges they face today, and to prepare them for tomorrow's challenges. "But I would be the only one to understand [the job] that way," he said.

Orban made a pointed, and poignant, remark about the Germans in the current war: "The Germans are suffering because they know what's in their national interest, but they're not able to say it." He meant that the German leadership knows it has no business being involved in a war with Russia, but is, for whatever reasons, unable to say no to Washington.

Someone raised the possibility of a coup d'état in Russia that removed Putin. Orban reacted strongly, saying that there is nobody in line to succeed Putin who would be anything but more hawkish. That would solve nothing.
I didn't realize there was a leader in the west that actually has his head screwed on straight. The final point regarding a coup in Russia, which they've tried already, is not going to give the results some may expect. Putin will be replaced by a type like Kadyrov if anything. If we think Putin is a hardliner, we will need a new term to describe his successor in the case of internal turmoil toppling him. There are many other even more hard-core people wanting to take the drivers seat, than Kadyrov by the way.

These officials who have and are advocating for this (and nonstop escalations) are insane and dangerous, because they are the kinds of people that look at a situation or problem or issue and try to solve it while completely ignoring all the factors which are surrounding the situtation, problem or issue and are inherently unable to ever solve anything properly because of this.

This trait is also extremely prevalent among even civilian populations now at least in my country, and we wonder why our society is degenerating. Well I'm certain this gives it a major boost.
 

pmc

Major
Registered Member
There is no common currency to have in BRICS. Do you even understand that a common currency with those countries would severely damage and cripple China's wealth and economy?

Look at BRICS:
  • Brazil: Failed economy
  • Russia: lol
  • India: enemy
  • China: The only strong one
  • South Africa: Irrelevant
If not for the hegemonic clash, it would make more sense for China to have a common currency with the US than with BRICS

Once again I request to unban Gatekeeper so that he can dispell these idiotic ideas that Lavrov is pushing as a smokescreen
Common currency with US means atleast Visa free travel and work. back in the days when Russia and EU had good relations Russia wanted visa free travel with Europe. It is about confidence on ideological foundation.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
I didn't realize there was a leader in the west that actually has his head screwed on straight. The final point regarding a coup in Russia, which they've tried already, is not going to give the results some may expect. Putin will be replaced by a type like Kadyrov if anything. If we think Putin is a hardliner, we will need a new term to describe his successor in the case of internal turmoil toppling him. There are many other even more hard-core people wanting to take the drivers seat, than Kadyrov by the way.

These officials who have and are advocating for this (and nonstop escalations) are insane and dangerous, because they are the kinds of people that look at a situation or problem or issue and try to solve it while completely ignoring all the factors which are surrounding the situtation, problem or issue and are inherently unable to ever solve anything properly because of this.

This trait is also extremely prevalent among even civilian populations now at least in my country, and we wonder why our society is degenerating. Well I'm certain this gives it a major boost.
What if the idiot Medvedev takes over?
 
Top