I fully agree with the response by @plawolf here, and I would like to expand further on his points.
Recall that there are two direct and two indirect contributors to the Cuban Missile Crisis:
1. Other than the Soviets stationing their nuclear-tipped R-12 and R-14 missiles in Cuba, the Americans were also stationing nuclear-tipped Jupiter missiles in Turkey and Italy;
2. The US has attempted an illegitimate invasion on sovereign socialist Cuba, which is the botched Bay of Pigs Invasion, alongside the multiple attempts at overthrowing Castro;
3. The missile gap between the US and the Soviet Union at the time, which rendered the Soviet Union unable to conduct effective retaliatory nuclear strikes against the US in case of nuclear war; and
4. The follow-up on the 1961 Berlin Standoff, which Khruschev believed that he need to get rid of NATO forces from West Berlin.
All of the 4 contributors above (or at least, the first 3) are well-defined, reasonable justification in the views of the Soviet Union's decision to station nuclear-tipped missiles in Cuba. In fact, in the eyes of the rest of the world, Soviet actions WRT Cuba can also be seen as a justifiable response to US actions WRT Cuba, Turkey and Italy.
That means even if the actions by the Soviets were seen as provocative and that the Soviet Union was viewed as the aggressor, similarly, the Americans too can be seen as provocative and that the USA too can be viewed as the aggressor.
Meanwhile, what justification does China have to station nukes on Cuba?
The Sinophobic warhawks in Congress declaring Cold War 2.0 against China?
US sailing warships through the Taiwan Strait?
Flying spy planes just outside Chinese territorial airspace?
CIA supporting Taiwanese and Xinjiang seperatist movements?
US government waging propaganda, trade, economic and technological wars against China?
Pelosi and (soon) McCarthy visiting Taiwan?
Bruh, those are pretty much 家常便饭 at this point. The recorded human history is choke full of examples like that.
However, did anyone just went gung-ho gun-blazzing "I wanna kill you all and your families and your friends and your relatives too" just because of that? No.
Going back to the topic, China has faced multiple instances of provocation by the West - In particular by the USA - Ever since the founding of the People's Republic in October 1949. These include the Yinhe Incident, 3rd Taiwan Strait Crisis Bombing of Chinese Embassy in Belgrade, 2001 Hainan Island Incident, the 2016 South China Sea standoff, and most recently, Pelosi's visit to Taiwan.
A declaration of Cold War 2.0 against China by the USA constitutes NOTHING when compared to the above.
If China is to station nuclear warheads on Cuba as a reponse to that declaration by the US Congress, what do you think the rest of the world is going to see China as?
At this very crucial and decisive moment since the founding of the PRC in the face of constant and intensifying emnity and provocation by the US, what China actually needs very much right now is more friends and more supporters on the world stage. The key objective for Beijing in the current global geopolitical development is to make the world sees China as much of a victim of the USA as possible, NOT making the world see China as much of an aggressor targetting the USA as possible.
Sometimes in the geopolitic realm, the act of voluntarily putting one's own country in the "weaker" position can do much more favor to the country's goal of garnering support from allies and other countries than adamantly holding onto the "stronger" position.
By stationing nukes on Cuba, China would be doing the exact opposite of what she is trying to achieve.
Furthermore, other countries would see China setting a precedent - That if China is to embroil in a serious dispute with Country A in the future, and that Country A is not cordial with a nearby Country B, China would station nukes in Country B in order to force Country A into changing its policies and decisions that would favor China. This would not only make regional situation even worse and unstable than it is already been, but also fueling the potential for more countries to disregard the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in order to pursue their own nuclear weapons for geopolitical gain.
This goes the same for just about any other nuclear power, which is why you don't see nuclear powers do that anymore.
Moreover, if China stations nukes on Cuba and causing the USA to finish off what is left undone 60+ years ago (i.e. invading Cuba militarily), Cuba is absolutely toast. Both Russia and China today have neither the capacity nor the capability required to meaningfully assist Cuba against the US aggression without resorting to nuclear war between the US+NATO and China+Russia.
Last but not least, China stationing nukes on Cuba would be a perfect tool for the USA to justify stationing nukes in Kadena or Osan, for instance - Serving as a direct response to China's actions WRT Cuba. For that, I don't think anyone here would like a Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0.
Last edited:
