Miscellaneous News

coolgod

Major
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Oh, well alright then
Did he just make up this whole thing on his own expecting it to make him look good and then have it blow up in his face every which way?
Seems to me like he owns Xi a public apology.
I don't think he made up this thing considering the MPs who allegedly received illegal funding was probably from his party (which won the election). This whole Chinese interference thing is a Canadian Deep State (e.g., CSIS) lie, from their master CIA to ruin China-Canada relations. Assuming he isn't that naive, he knows it too and only pretended to "confront Xi" in their earlier 10-minute meeting just to push back against domestic pressure.

Xi wasn't having any of it and taught him a lesson on why you should not bullshit about your private convos with China's leader.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't think he made up this thing considering the MPs who allegedly received illegal funding was probably from his party (which won the election). This whole Chinese interference thing is a Canadian Deep State (e.g., CSIS) lie, from their master CIA to ruin China-Canada relations. Assuming he isn't that naive, he knows it too and only pretended to "confront Xi" in their earlier 10-minute meeting just to push back against domestic pressure.

Xi wasn't having any of it and taught him a lesson on why you should not bullshit about your private convos with China's leader.
If that's the case, wouldn't him coming out now saying he was never briefed be considered "创造条件" or "create the right conditions"?
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
Juat to repost this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Quoting the first sentence from the article:
The weapons have been built to 'threaten the United States', the commander of Washington's Pacific Fleet has said
Yeah, no sh1t Sherlock.

To be fair, every high school kid understand something called Newton's 3rd Law from their Physics lessons.

Perhaps you should ask your commanders on where the American Trident 2 and Minuteman 3 are aimed at?

Besides, DF-5, DF-41 and JL-3 only debuted after Minuteman 3 and Trident 2 did. So there's that.
 
Last edited:

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
LOL...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Australia’s ‘cleaner coal’ is a systematic export scam, Wilkie to tell parliament​


November 21, 2022 — 5.02am

Australian coal exporters have been falsifying data to suggest their coal is cleaner than it is in order to increase its export price in a scam involving two testing laboratories, major accountancy firms and an investment bank, federal MP Andrew Wilkie is expected to tell parliament on Monday.

Wilkie says he has been provided with thousands of pages of documents by an industry whistleblower and will call for a parliamentary inquiry into the allegations, days after the corporate watchdog decided against taking action against one of the laboratory companies.

Andrew Wilkie will make the claims in parliament on Monday and call for a parliamentary inquiry.

Andrew Wilkie will make the claims in parliament on Monday and call for a parliamentary inquiry.Credit:James Brickwood

“The fraud is environmental vandalism and makes all the talk of net zero emissions by 2050 a fiction,” says a draft of the speech, seen by this masthead.

“It could also be criminal, trashing corporate reputations as well as our national reputation.”

According to the whistleblower and the documents he has provided, coal testing laboratories that certify the quality of coal shipments leaving Australia have been falsifying data to suggest the coal is of higher quality than their tests show.
The falsified data shows the coal to be drier than it is. Since drier coal burns more cleanly, less of it is needed to be burnt for electricity and it creates fewer emissions per kilowatt produced so can be sold for higher prices.

For years Australian industry leaders and politicians have justified ongoing coal exports as the world grapples with climate change on the grounds that Australian coal displaces the comparatively dirtier competitors’ coal that would produce more greenhouse gas emissions when burnt.

In July, Prime Minister
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, using that justification of a cleaner product.
 

Feima

Junior Member
Registered Member
Juat to repost this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Quoting the first sentence from the article:

For decades, on China, the US Pacific Fleet CinC usually talks in a manner far above his station, as if he is the US foreign minister. In this particular case this guy at least only talks about military stuff and not anything beyond his authority.
 

Jj888

New Member
Registered Member
LOL...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Australia’s ‘cleaner coal’ is a systematic export scam, Wilkie to tell parliament​


November 21, 2022 — 5.02am

Australian coal exporters have been falsifying data to suggest their coal is cleaner than it is in order to increase its export price in a scam involving two testing laboratories, major accountancy firms and an investment bank, federal MP Andrew Wilkie is expected to tell parliament on Monday.

Wilkie says he has been provided with thousands of pages of documents by an industry whistleblower and will call for a parliamentary inquiry into the allegations, days after the corporate watchdog decided against taking action against one of the laboratory companies.

Andrew Wilkie will make the claims in parliament on Monday and call for a parliamentary inquiry.

Andrew Wilkie will make the claims in parliament on Monday and call for a parliamentary inquiry.Credit:James Brickwood

“The fraud is environmental vandalism and makes all the talk of net zero emissions by 2050 a fiction,” says a draft of the speech, seen by this masthead.

“It could also be criminal, trashing corporate reputations as well as our national reputation.”

According to the whistleblower and the documents he has provided, coal testing laboratories that certify the quality of coal shipments leaving Australia have been falsifying data to suggest the coal is of higher quality than their tests show.
The falsified data shows the coal to be drier than it is. Since drier coal burns more cleanly, less of it is needed to be burnt for electricity and it creates fewer emissions per kilowatt produced so can be sold for higher prices.

For years Australian industry leaders and politicians have justified ongoing coal exports as the world grapples with climate change on the grounds that Australian coal displaces the comparatively dirtier competitors’ coal that would produce more greenhouse gas emissions when burnt.

In July, Prime Minister
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, using that justification of a cleaner product.
It’s time for China to impose fine on those previously imported coal based on these reports
 
Top