Miscellaneous News

Andy1974

Senior Member
Registered Member
Adidas losses are mainly because they lost the public support of the largest economy in the world. Just making some collaborations and silently trying to restock them into unwilling local Chinese stores will not help them, it would be just a token gesture.

Instead it would be time for Adidas to earn back consumer confidence by marketing themselves as a mixture of foreign design and home grown quality materiel. Embrace and widely market Adidas's suppliers, their diversity in local design and workforce. Emphasize that it is a German - not generic western - brand, hiring local talent, local workers, using responsibly farmed and respected local material instead of cheap and dubious third world cotton.

During a period of increasing skepticism against the west caused by America's actions, Adidas, and the German government overall, can market themselves with great success if they lean into the fact that most Chinese appreciate some degree of exotic foreign work, but also want to be seen as supporting local industry and taking a consumers' stand against an aggressive west.
Great, if Adidas is “in China, for China” then it can be very successful. They should invest in Chinese cotton suppliers in Xinjiang to lower their material costs as well as to regain the publics support.

Even if Adidas were bastards about Xinjiang, they are better than Nike, geopolitically. Helping them, hurts Nike.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
I read a market report from a few months ago where Anta is just behind Adidas in China. Nike is up ahead in number one place. Under Armour I'm not sure where, but doing quite well. Personally I prefer like the strategy with EVs where they team up with European brands under JVs and acquisitions. But that is just my opinion. I just worry that Chinese athleisure is still not seen as sexy enough. Anta and Li-Ning are doing fine, but 361, Peak Sports, Erke are not doing comparatively well. 361, Peak and Erke are becoming an under-class which to me is a concern. I think all three of these brands signed up NBA stars but it doesn't translate that well in sales. I think their marketing should include extreme sports stars to amp up their sex appeal.

These Chinese sportswear brands, they just want to sign up NBA stars. I think if they sign up racing car drivers such as Zhou Guanyu (F1), or some wakeboarding star or mountain climbing star is an alternate strategy.

Just my two cents.
Well, I do feel Anta and Li-Ning are on a level above. Xi was spotted sporting an Arc'Teryx jacket at the Olympics. Salty tears subsequently flowed (just google it to see).

361 and Peak both signed like marginal NBA players. There are very few Tier-1 stars signed with anyone other than Nike, basically just Kawhi Leonard with New Balance (because he is a weird guy), and Steph Curry with Under Armor.

Peak signed Andrew Wiggins, who up until last year was probably less accomplished than his own mother.

(She won 4 silver medals in the LA Olympics, had a 30 year record as the fastest Canadian woman and resultantly had a park named after her in her (and his) hometown, a suburb of Toronto)

If they are not able to find success on their own terms, then they could try to hook up with Adidas if there is an opportunity. However, you did originally mention Anta, who I find is doing well on its own.

You are right that they can find alternative sports to try to build up their brand as well.
 

daifo

Captain
Registered Member
Everyone trying to copy China these days

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

American's have gone full-tard with trying to cancel tik-tok. FB and Twitter which both caused huge civil unrest/voting issues in the US is worst than the tok which had no real connection with any conspiracies the past 4 years. I guess the only positive point is that it will enlighten a few of the younger generation that the US is also somewhat Authoritarian and advocates for censoring / propaganda too.
 
Last edited:

GZDRefugee

Junior Member
Registered Member
After the azov battalion in HK shenanigans and now open support for secessionists, remind me why China isn't directly supporting Russia?
 

Michaelsinodef

Senior Member
Registered Member
After the azov battalion in HK shenanigans and now open support for secessionists, remind me why China isn't directly supporting Russia?
Think there's more reasons for why China continue to remain neutral.

Although stunt as these can end up pushing China, or directly be used as an excuse for possible or future support of Russia if needed.
 

HereToSeePics

Junior Member
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Registered Member
After the azov battalion in HK shenanigans and now open support for secessionists, remind me why China isn't directly supporting Russia?

The simplest and most significant reason is Europe has a lot of trade+investments in China and China has a lot of trade+investments in Europe. A rapid decoupling with asset seizures and sanctions will be extremely damaging to both economies with the costs outweighing the benefits by orders of magnitude.

Be friends with everyone you can so you can do business with everyone, because at the end, economic strength reinforces political and military strength.
 
Last edited:
Top