Miscellaneous News

Strangelove

Colonel
Registered Member
LOL....Brandon you mad? The chances of US/UK/Ukr terrorism in the Black Sea is very high, nice move Russia.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Biden ‘outraged’ by Russian move​

Moscow suspended the Ukraine grain deal after an attack on Black Sea Fleet ships involved in securing the trade route

US President Joe Biden has claimed there is absolutely “no merit” to Moscow’s decision to halt the agreement which allowed the export of Ukrainian grain via the Black Sea.

Russia previously warned that the shipping route could be abused by smugglers, and put the deal on hold on Saturday following what it called a “terrorist attack” on vessels involved in ensuring the security of the corridor.

“It’s purely outrageous… It’s going to increase starvation,” Biden told reporters in Delaware on Saturday. “There’s no merit to what they’re doing. The UN negotiated that deal and that should be the end of it.”

Russia
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on Saturday that it had halted its compliance with the pact, brokered by the UN and Türkiye earlier this year. The move came after Kiev launched a major drone attack on the Black Sea Fleet and civilian vessels involved in securing safe passage for agricultural cargo from Ukrainian ports, the Russian Defense Ministry explained.

Ukrainian authorities neither confirmed nor denied carrying out the attack, but called Russia’s decision to suspend the grain deal “primitive blackmail.”

President Vladimir Zelensky said dozens of ships are currently stranded, some for more than three weeks, and accused Russia of setting up a “deliberate blockade” to bring a “large-scale famine to Africa and Asia.”

On Friday, the Russian Foreign Ministry explained that Moscow’s experts involved in checking ships sailing under the agreement are being pressured by an “artificial” crowding of vessels in the port of Istanbul, apparently to push them into less rigorous cargo checks.
Following the blast on the strategic Crimean Bridge earlier this month, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that if it turns out that Ukraine used grain corridors to smuggle explosives, “it would put the very existence of these corridors in question.”

Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) accused Ukrainian military intelligence of masterminding the bombing. The explosives, it claimed, originated in the port city of Odessa and traveled through Bulgaria, Georgia and Armenia before reaching the target destination.

The breakthrough deal between Moscow and Kiev was reached in Istanbul in July with mediation by the UN and Türkiye. It aimed to unlock agricultural exports via the Black Sea from Russia and Ukraine – two of the world’s leading grain exporters – which had ground to halt due to the conflict between the two nations.

The deal was praised as critical to easing the global food crisis and helping the world’s poorest nations to avoid starvation.
The Russian leader, however, repeatedly accused Western nations of taking over grain exported from Ukraine, instead of allowing it to be delivered to developing countries. Late last month he said that of the 203 ships that left Ukrainian ports as of September 23, only four went to the poorest countries.

Russia's Agriculture Minister Dmitry Patrushev signaled on Saturday that Moscow is ready, with Türkiye’s help, to send the world’s poorest countries up to 500,000 tons of grain within the next four next months. He noted that considering this year's harvest, Russia “is fully ready to replace Ukrainian grain” and arrange deliveries to “all interested countries” at a reasonable price.
 

Sinnavuuty

Senior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Biden administration is considering reducing arms supplies to the kingdom in the context of OPEC+'s decision to reduce daily oil production, including the supply of missiles from the Patriot anti-aircraft system. I have to say that a break with Saudi Arabia would be the biggest shot in the foot since Russian sanctions. Punishments that are too severe could lead the Saudis to make large purchases from Russia or even close the deal to sell oil in Yuan.

Let's see how far this goes, currently the US has called the entire OPEC+ pro-Russian and Saudi Arabia wants to join the BRICS.
 

hullopilllw

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Biden administration is considering reducing arms supplies to the kingdom in the context of OPEC+'s decision to reduce daily oil production, including the supply of missiles from the Patriot anti-aircraft system. I have to say that a break with Saudi Arabia would be the biggest shot in the foot since Russian sanctions. Punishments that are too severe could lead the Saudis to make large purchases from Russia or even close the deal to sell oil in Yuan.

Let's see how far this goes, currently the US has called the entire OPEC+ pro-Russian and Saudi Arabia wants to join the BRICS.
They pointed to the upcoming December OPEC meeting as an inflection point, and said that if the Saudis increase production after that meeting then the U.S. may not take any actions against Saudi Arabia at all.

Listen, I am giving you another chance to bow down as I ordered, or else..but remember it is you who need me.
 

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
gif-eating-popcorn-43.gif


Honestly at this point when they try to blame the Chinese government for anything bad that happens I just laugh it off.

Since Itaewon is near a US base and historically fed off US soldiers, Halloween is a US festival and Itaewon is just a gaudy, decadent nightlife district full of American culture, surely CNN should be blaming the US federal government for causing the Itaewon stampede?
fed off US soldiers

Oh boy, you had to go there. Indeed the original hanja for Itaewon is "異胎院" or "foreign baby inn", due to it being created to service Yongsan Garrison. Naturally American GI is not going to accept you telling him he needs to put on a condom. Later on they realized this is probably something they shouldn't be proud of so they changed the hanja to identically pronounced "梨泰院" or "pear tree inn".
 

zhangjim

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm tired of those replies. Those people are always clamoring how the leaders of the past met their requirements and expectations, while the current leaders are just tyrants,now this country is "out of control"...
This gave me a strange idea that the leaders of the past had a tendency to surrender. When people see how arrogant those foreigners are to say that they do not want to be bound by local laws, they will have to doubt whether there is a problem with the requirements of these western countries.

The specific content of Richard Haass's article is here, and I have been hesitating to put it on which topic:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

He signed on to a “no limits” relationship with Russia on the eve of Vladimir Putin initiating a brutal, unwarranted, and costly war against Ukraine, one that violates what had historically been precepts long at the core of Chinese foreign policy, including a commitment to non-aggression, to respect territorial integrity and sovereignty of others, and to avoid interfering in the internal affairs of others.
Americans are masters at reversing right and wrong. He skillfully equated not supporting Ukraine with supporting Russia.
They are trying to force us to obey them, but obviously this will only lead us to the other side.
We also see troubling signs in what China will not do. China refused to cooperate with the WHO or preserve evidence as to the origins of the Covid-19 virus despite legitimate questions as to its origin. There is no evidence that China is using leverage it possesses to influence the aggressive behavior of North Korea. And while China is not to the best of my knowledge supplying Russia with arms, it continues to purchase energy from Russia, in the process funding its war effort.

We've had a decade of this and there is no reason to believe Xi will recalibrate.
Now it is clear that the United States is giving orders to China. "You didn't do what I told you, so I'm going to destroy you".
Americans make every effort to demand obedience from China and show a "you, a barbarian, must join civilized world" attitude.
Taiwan represents a threat to the PRC not because of what it does but because of what it is. It represents an alternative political, economic, and social path for China and the Chinese people.
I'm so fucking moved. Do Americans really feel that they have the obligation and ability to plan the future for all mankind? If so, why should they abandon South Vietnam and Afghanistan?
What should the United States and its partners do about this?

First, augment deterrence. The goal is to deter a war or failing that to defend Taiwan rather than liberate it. For the United States, this means increasing our defense budget—the good news is we spent much more as a percentage of GDP during the Cold War and it did not crowd out other spending. Just as important, it means shifting capabilities to the Indo-Pacific, hardening our bases, dispersing our forces by seeking new access arrangements, and pushing our military services to prioritize China. A clearer commitment to come to Taiwan’s defense, what I have termed strategic clarity, would help as well. So too would staying the course on behalf of Ukraine and against Russia; it is critical that the attempted acquisition of territory by force by Russia not succeed lest China learn a dangerous lesson…and, more broadly, that disrespect of borders not become a feature of international relations lest what order there is in the world be forfeited.

Taiwan for its part needs to urgently transform its defense. Its consistent increases in defense spending are welcome, but more is needed. Taiwan needs to use that money wisely, investing in asymmetric capabilities like missiles and small attack boats that are survivable. It needs to develop a territorial defense force. A lesson from Ukraine should be that all of Taiwan's people will need to be involved, not just those in uniform. Taiwan also needs to focus on its resiliency by stockpiling energy and food and figuring out how to continue to function as a society without the internet or telecommunications.

Japan will play a critical role in any defense of Taiwan, and the United States needs to gain a better understanding from Japan on the scope of assistance it would provide. Public statements from Japanese leaders that any attack on U.S. forces in Japan would be considered to be an attack on Japan itself would be welcomed.

Second, deterrence and if need be defense requires reducing our collective economic reliance on China, both as a market and as a provider of inputs. Here I'm not just talking about rare earth minerals or other strategic items. I am talking about anything where the volume of trade makes it strategic. We need to conduct a comprehensive analysis of our vulnerability during a crisis and take steps to address it. I don't think decoupling is feasible or desirable but what I would describe as economic distancing may well be. This applies to Europe, to Japan, South Korea, to the United States, and any other partner or ally. And to Taiwan. It makes no strategic sense that Taiwan's largest trading partner is the mainland. That needs to be adjusted. Economic leverage must work in our favor, not China’s.

Third, we need to act responsibly and with discipline. The goal should be to avoid war. This will require avoiding needless provocation. Taiwan’s formal independence is not in the cards. The stakes are too big for symbols or needless provocations. To the contrary, there is a role for reassurance of China, including continued fidelity to the one-China policy.

It is best to understand Taiwan and the US-China-Taiwan triangle as a situation to be managed rather than a problem to be solved. Unilateral action by any party in an effort to change the fundamentals must be avoided. All three parties as well as the region and the world have benefitted from an imperfect but stable situation. The goal of diplomacy should be to extend this, as the alternative is sure to be costly in every way for everyone be they involved directly or not.
After a long speech, this part is the main idea of the warmonger.
The summary is as follows:
1、Further increase military expenditure;
2、Explicit and open provision of military protection to Taiwan Island - I believe this will only accelerate the march towards war;
3、Require Taiwan Island to be fully fortressed;
4、Demand that Japan must be involved in possible future conflicts;
5、Weakening China's supply chain position economically;
6、Adopt delaying tactics and steadily advance the independence process without touching the bottom line.

I don't know whether this person has expressed the intention of the American top management. If it is true, then I think the military preparation must be accelerated and completed in the next few years
 
Top