Again, context matters. In a diplomatic setting between peers no diplomat is expected to speak in any language other than their own. That's what interpreters are for.
So to clarify in case I wasn't already clear, my reply was in response to LawLeadsToPeace's desire for Chinese officials to have such ability as that of the Saudi energy minister in his dressing-down of the reporter.
Unlike CMP as he's so keen to react, I have no personal desire to express my opinion on what foreign language Chinese government officials should or shouldn't learn to speak.
Miscellaneous News
Capitalism is bad when it is non-Americans conducting it. Americans and Europeans are used to other peoples taking decisions that will benefit them. They could force that order in the past. Now, that power is fast slipping away and we will see a lot of extremely stupid comments all the way from...www.sinodefenceforum.com
Good, tell that to whoever thinks China needs to own western journos in their tongue at press conferences like the Saudis do, or the Indians, or whomever.
Still, I think some of you need to work on your own English when my comment seems to keep getting mis-interpreted as "Chinese officials should learn to speak English and argue in it" when I'd suggested nothing of the sort.
To be fair, you did say this:
So, despite the context you outlined, I can't blame others for thinking that you were advocating for the Chinese to respond in English. Just for clarification, you were saying that the Chinese should learn how to clearly understand the intent of the reporters to debate and slap them down no?Not to denigrate Chinese officials, but they need to speak better English first, particularly the art of debating in English.